that he would support the 87 billion even if the tax cuts aren't changed.
If that's the kind of fight he (and the other Democrats) plan to put up there is no point in even trying to tie the 87 billion to the tax cuts. Why bother to put up this sham fight if they've already admitted they're just going to roll over in the end?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
