Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ann Coulter + Herman Cain + John Edwards + Rielle Hunter = WT effing F?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-11 10:18 PM
Original message
Ann Coulter + Herman Cain + John Edwards + Rielle Hunter = WT effing F?


Once You Go Conservative Black, You Better Watch Your Back

Posted by Herman Cain on 12/01

By: Ann Coulter
www.townhall.com

With the mainstream media giddily reporting on an alleged affair involving Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain, how long can it be before they break the news that their 2004 vice presidential candidate conceived a love child with his mistress, Rielle Hunter?

The left is trying to destroy Cain with a miasma of hazy accusations leveled by three troubled women. Considered individually, the accusations are utterly unbelievable. They are even less credible taken together. This is how liberals destroy a man, out of nothing.

After the first round of baseless accusations against Cain, an endless stream of pundits rolled out the clicheas if it were the height of originalityThis isnt he said-she said; its he-said, she-said, she-said, she-said, shesaid.

Au contraire: We had two shes and only one said.

http://www.hermancain.com/news/once_you_go_conservative...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-11 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. what a cesspool that site is. i need a bath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-11 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. If coulter plays her cards right she could have cain come play with her
she is blonde and white just the woman cain prefers
On a side note I have wondered for years why she has never married........
has been engaged twice ....... does she live in a closet??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. "..... does she live in a closet??"
Edited on Tue Dec-06-11 12:26 AM by DCKit
On a hanger, I think. Probably upside-down, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. She's never been married because she's quite fond of her cigarettes and Chardonnay,
according to David Brock. She's an adult, and welcome to her vices, but I have always wondered what he did not write for fear of being sued.

There's another story with Ann Coulter, but I don't think it involves a closet. I think it involves the fact that any potential romantic interests read the drivel she believes passes as a "book", and run the other way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Genealogist Donating Member (495 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. Poor Ann, she doesn't know RW propaganda when she sees it take out one of their own
Take heart, Annie. There are plenty of other wingnuts still in the race that are every bit the bottom feeder that you are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. Gee Ann who has gained from Cain's "problems"
could it be ... Newt???? DUH! :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. Yeah, because John Edwards is going to be up before the voters
in Iowa in less than a month. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 06:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. some political party somewhere decided
that anything less than full and detailed disclosure of extra-marital sexual behavior was an impeachable offense.... I wonder who set that standard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Oct 20th 2014, 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC