The Blame Game
November 17, 2005
by Michael Shannon
Underground Needs Your Help!... Please Donate!
This week is our fourth quarter 2005 fund drive. Our
goal is to bring in 1000 individual donations before midnight
on Sunday, November 20. There is no minimum (or maximum)
donation. Whether you can spare $5 or $500, your contribution
will bring us one step closer to our goal. So please take
a moment to donate right now!
The argument that the Bush administration did not polish – that's
the nicest word I could think of – the intelligence concerning Iraq's
capabilities in the weeks and months leading to the onset of hostilities
Every speck of information on the subject which has reached the
light of day since then has been directly supportive of the notion
that a very small group of people came to the conclusion that the
removal of Saddam Hussein, and the taking control of Iraq, was not
only a good idea, it was a necessary one. It also shows that they
then did everything in their power to sell that idea, regardless
of any and all evidence to the contrary of its merit and in doing
so used every trick in the book. How anyone can deny this is beyond
If you are in the ever-diminishing minority that believe Bush
was on the up-and-up concerning Iraq, you most likely base some
of your continued support on the fact that you are having a hard
time believing that an American president could foul up so completely.
But you have to keep this in mind when you ask yourself how Team
Bush could have gotten it so wrong: Bush and his boys were counting
on a win. No matter what history would prove later on - that there
were no WMDs, that Iraq was not even in the ballpark on a nuclear
weapon, that there was no Iraq/al Qaeda connection, etc. – was not
And if you look at it from their point of view their lack of concern
makes some sense. They knew that the Iraqi army was a shell of its
former self. They knew that contrary to Tony Blair's absurd claim
that the Iraqi army had vast stockpiles of chemical weaponry that
they could bring to bear on the battlefield within 45 minutes, that
Iraq did not have any such capability. They knew that the pitched
battles between massed forces would be totally one-sided in our
favor. And that the war would be over in weeks. In all of this,
they were correct.
Had Iraq immediately settled down upon cessation of "major
combat operations" and quickly rebounded economically, socially
and politically, all the pre-war sins would have been washed away.
Which, truth be told, had it all gone according to plan would have
been a beautiful thing. The war itself would remain as vile as all
wars are but at least it would have been of a very short duration.
Unfortunately there was a sizable percentage of Iraqis who had a
The war in Iraq has become an albatross for George Bush. Mr. Bush
wanted to be known as the War On Terror President, but instead he
has become simply the Terrible President. A fact that more people
are coming to grips with on a daily basis.
The collapse in confidence in Bush, verified by polls across the
entire socio-political spectrum has both been fed by and is triggering
a whole new wave of open skepticism about every aspect of the Iraq
war, opening up sores that the Bushies thought were long behind
them. The task in front of them now is exponentially harder than
the task they set for themselves in the selling of the war in the
first place. Now they have to do it to people who know they are
making it up as they go along.
As it becomes increasingly obvious that people aren't buying it
this time around and the negatives keep skyrocketing on Bush – the
guy has gone from a 90% to a 36% approval rate since 9/11 - he has
responded by going into attack mode. Two speeches in the past week
were both very bitter in tone and content. Mr. Bush, utilizing his
singular gift for inverting reality, was in particularly good form.
John F. Kennedy once said that "victory has a thousand fathers,
but defeat is an orphan." That has been turned upside-down
by George Bush. When things were going well, Bush was more than
happy to strut into the spotlight. That was him alone on the deck
of the Lincoln, not him with a bipartisan group of Congress members,
nor even a group of his closest supporters in his own party. No,
it was just the Boy King George, parading like the returning conquering
hero. Ego run completely amuck.
Now he's not only no longer strutting about, he has switched to
the argument that "it wasn't just me!" Now that things
have been going lousy in Iraq for almost three years, he is looking
to spread the blame as far and as wide as possible. For a guy who
had the cojones to campaign as a "uniter not a divider,"
he has done a remarkable job of driving a schism through the political
If he was a uniter, the minute he gets off the plane from his
Asian trip he would call a conference where he would take two or
three dozen members of Congress, with maybe some private sector
big shots thrown in, to Camp David and say, "we're not leaving
until we come to a consensus on Iraq."
But he won't do that. He will most likely do what he always does.
He will lash out at those who question him, he will continue to
seek the council of people who helped get him in this mess in the
first place and he will continue to avoid making the hard choices
that need to be made. And American GIs will keep right on dying.