|
Try and Catch the Wind
October 15, 2005
By Daniel Patrick Welch
To
understand fully the nature of the American dilemma, one has only
to view it from slightly outside the bubble. My wife and I have
been restricted from foreign travel for various bureaucratic and
financial reasons; but our sanity depends on hundreds of connections
around the globe for perspective and comfort. The sea change in
this perspective from without reveals the utter hopelessness of
the U.S. position, and underscores a grave warning to those still
willing or able to listen at home.
An interesting phenomenon, even in our small circle of friends,
has unfolded over the past few years. At first, our foreign friends
and contacts, stunned by the election debacle of 2000 and wary of
warmonger Bush, seemed quite happy to have met and befriended members
of the American "left." A sort of camaraderie developed as we commiserated
over the decline of critical thought and the alarming state of what
passes for debate on the U.S. political spectrum. Horrified by the
runup to war, foreigners working far from home felt a certain comfort
in knowing that not all Americans shared the President's bloodlust;
the comfort, of course, was mutual. Then, as things didn’t get better,
and in fact worsened with the 2004 election, these friends one by
one sailed for safer seas. After all, they were on contract; they
didn’t have family and cultural ties, and so were free to flee in
horror and revulsion from what they saw America becoming.
And flee they did. At this writing, not a single one of our close
circle has stayed stateside. It was as if those looking through
the bubble from without let out a collective "Sucks to be you!"
at their former allies in mutual fear. Bush’s reelection, for many
of them, was the final straw: it’s one thing to blame the government
instead of the people, but I mean come on—twice in a row?! These
insights, of course, are personal and anecdotal; but they reflect
the general bewilderment of those outside America’s borders, who
shake their heads in disbelief. Finally, eventually, they must cut
the cord and get on with their lives, like friends of a drunk who
just can’t seem to hit bottom and wake up.
With contacts on many continents, I have tried to keep a line
open to this audience—those who still might care what is going on
over here—and have had the good fortune to have my columns translated
in over 20 languages. But even this effort has slowed, as it seems
fewer translators can get over questioning what the hell is wrong
with us. Seems about right: you can only shovel shit against the
tide for so long, I guess.
It may seem odd to write this just when liberals are expressing
such glee over what they hope is the impending implosion of the
Bush agenda. And I must admit I get a kick out of the flurry of
indictments poised to rain down on this criminal cabal, certainly
far better a fate than they deserve, or than they have meted out
to their own enemies. And yes, Bush is struggling to reach even
Nixonian levels in his own approval ratings. But what is disapproval
to a man who should by all rights be in prison, or, by his own brand
of justice, laying on one of his own guerneys in Texas waiting for
one of his cronies to push the plunger. And what, pray tell, can
the 37% of those polled who approve of Bush’s performance be thinking—who
won’t see the writing on the wall, it seems, until they are trounced
on the head with a big stick? [That might the subject of my next
column, Waiting for the Locusts.]
And yes, Katrina revealed, however briefly, the deeply entrenched
infrastructure of racism and classism that white America has tried
to dismiss for centuries. But this opportunity to discuss poverty
and race has largely disappeared, nipped at the heels by the next
fresh horror out of Pakistan and Iraq. We have watched as they have
set the agenda for the next hundred years, endangering our future
in the world even for our children’s children. The world will not—and
should not—forget the insatiable American lust for war, the torture,
the depleted uranium, the slaughter of innocents, for as long as
we are alive, at least. And as much fun as it is to see these bastards
get a taste of their own medicine, it is sobering to remember just
how much power they still wield. And they certainly won’t give it
up without a fight. It took twelve years to bring the Nazi horror
to heel, and the Bush war machine certainly isn’t facing military
annihilation; not even a toenail trimming from his timid opponents
in congress.
This realization offers some insight into what I see as the gulf
between our fleeting optimism and the negative outlook of my parents’
generation. Past the tittilation of putting a few thieves in jail,
the prospect of a 20-year struggle must be downright depressing
for those nearing their eighties.
I realize that things are not quite yet as bad as they were in
the McCarthy years, no matter how the civil libertarians might shriek.
But they also have the unprecedented capacity to get much worse
in an instant. The police state stands at hair-trigger readiness,
waiting for the flick of the first domino by Bush or some future
zealous front man. We are seeing the perfect storm that libertarians
and anarchists alike have warned us about for generations: the unholy
merger of the überstate and corporate hegemony.
And the juggernaut rolls on. Since the dawn of the industrial
era (and maybe long before, but at least since then) the forces
of reaction have eventually mastered every challenge thrown at them,
from the idea of democracy itself to trade unionism to the abolition
of slavery and apartheid to universal suffrage. The people have
often valiantly fought back, winning concessions and bits of progress
at enormous cost. Now, through a witches' brew of manufactured consent,
unprecedented concentration of media ownership, outright tampering
and old fashioned fraud, they may finally have dispensed with the
pesky notion of election once and for all.
If this sounds dark, maybe I should elucidate. I don't feel quite
as despairing as this may sound. At most it takes the edge of my
most recent unwarranted bout of giddiness. Since the very beginning
of my own political formation, I have always thought that we were
involved in a lifelong struggle, a labor of love and conviction
whose fruits we might never see. But I have always harbored an ideological
and rhetorical, if not altogether practical, faith in the power
of people to resist. Every so often a shaft of light breaks through,
my latest epiphany being the massive popular resistance to the Iraq
war that helped box in the Bush administration and fray its alliances.
Holy shit! I thought as I gazed down Second Ave, maybe we will see
radical change in our lifetime. And poof—like a mirage, it was gone.
There are some bright spots, not least the apparent general revulsion
of even the American public. And right wing hegemony in the media
is being challenged on many fronts, on the Internet, and even on
talk radio itself. My wife commented recently on the ubiquity of
satellite, allowing, among other things, workers at a local sub
shop to watch the Greek Parliament. "My God," she said, if we can't
even stand American TV news, imagine how foreigners must feel!"
So no, of course I'm not suggesting that we give up the fight.
Quite the contrary. Those fighting for a more just social order
should never flinch; we should take advantage of any opportunities
that present themselves, electoral or organizational, to make even
the smallest dent in the onslaught. When the boat is sinking, you
bail with whatever you can: if the pumps fail, use buckets; if there
are no buckets, use your hands.
"In the chilly hours and minutes of uncertainty," the song goes,
we are perhaps forbidden by our debt to future generations from
losing hope. Maybe the "opposition" party will rise to the occasion
and embrace fundamental change, though it has done so in only two
brief shining moments in its own history. Maybe the world community,
beyond minor sniping, will sanction the US as a pariah state and
force change upon us. Maybe the people themselves will rise up and
demand change. If only they would disapprove in the way Mussolini’s
people did. Maybe Karl Rove really will be frog-marched out of the
White House. There are a million ways in which this house of greasy,
blood-stained cards could come crashing down. Nothing would make
me happier. "'twould make me sing," as the song goes. There may
be more hopeful days ahead; but for now, the song seems to end as
written by Donovan, "…Ah, but I might as well try and catch the
wind."
Writer, singer, linguist and activist Daniel
Patrick Welch lives and writes in Salem, Massachusetts, with
his wife, Julia Nambalirwa-Lugudde. Together they run The
Greenhouse School.
|