Faith-Based Deja Vu
March 29, 2005
By Bennet G. Kelley
As it enters its fifth year, President Bush's Faith-Based Initiative
has finally emerged from obscurity, but this may not be good news
for the administration. The initiative gained attention for being
one of the few social programs left untouched by Bush's budget ax
only to have its former deputy director emerge to criticize the
administration for providing less than ten percent of the $6.8 billion
promised over the past four years.
More significantly, in the last few months two federal courts
have held that grants awarded under the initiative violated the
First Amendment of the Constitution by promoting and/or funding
religious activities. Similar cases are pending.
The Faith-Based Initiative seeks to expand the role of faith-based
organizations (FBOs) in providing federally-funded social services.
The danger for the Bush administration is that as more attention
is focused on this initiative, people may recognize that it increasingly
resembles Bush's Texas faith-based program which a Texas Freedom
Network study found to be "unregulated, prone to favoritism
and commingling of funds, and even dangerous to the very people
it is supposed to serve."
Bush launched the Texas faith-based program in 1996, stressing
that "[g]overnment can hand out money, but [only faith can]
put hope in our hearts." The Texas program established an alternative
and more lax accreditation system for FBOs in order to include groups
such as Teen Challenge, a faith-based substance abuse program praised
by Bush despite having a 49-page list of health and safety codes
violations including failing to "protect the health, safety,
rights and welfare of clients."
The Texas study found that the alternatively accredited FBOs had
a confirmed abuse and neglect rate that was 25 times higher than
state-licensed facilities. Several of these alternatively accredited
FBOs were treating drug and alcohol addiction without any medical
component and instead treated it as a "sin" for which
"Jesus Christ was the solution."
The Texas study also revealed that grants were awarded to FBOs
over proven, more cost-effective providers solely because of the
faith component of their services. More significantly, constitutional
restrictions were ignored as some state-funded FBOs coerced secular
clients into joining their religious services and grant funds were
commingled with church funds and used to purchase bibles.
Despite these results, Bush has followed the same approach with
his federal initiative. As in Texas, Bush launched the federal initiative
by loosening regulatory requirements for FBOs which included removing
several constitutionally required safeguards (e.g., allowing federal
funds to build religious structures), limiting oversight to "self-audits,"
and seeking to exempt FBOs from job discrimination laws.
Like Texas, there is evidence of favoritism and commingling of
funds as Federal grants were awarded to a number of conservative
religious leaders and friends of the Bush administration, including
Pat Robertson's "Operation Blessing." This has lead some to dismiss
the initiative as a pork barrel program for the religious right.
In October, a federal court found federal faith-based grants for
a Montana rural health care program that sought to "advance[e]
and endors[e] religion as a substantial component" of providing
health care to be unconstitutional. The Montana program favored
FBOs over secular programs and provided grants on a non-competitive
basis to a nursing school that instructed students on the use of
prayer and worship as therapeutic practices.
As in Texas, FBOs have used federal funds for religious instruction
and to proselytize. In the most recent case, the court halted funding
for a Wisconsin mentoring program for children of prisoners which
required the mentors to "read, act out or talk about Biblical
examples of where Jesus showed grace to people," introduce
the children to the Bible and provide reports on whether the children
were "progressing in [their] relationship with God."
This is not an isolated case, as a suit filed in February challenged
funding of a Pennsylvania job training program for prison inmates
run by Firm Foundation where a significant portion of the inmates'
time is devoted towards religious discussions and not learning job
skills. Firm Foundation's founder, Wayne H. Blow, defended the program
by asking "[w]hat is wrong with faith if it can make a difference
in people's lives?" This response, however, only demonstrates the
alarming failure of the administration to provide clear guidance
on the constitutional limitations on the use of federal funds, since
the question is not whether faith can make a difference but whether
the government should sponsor religious indoctrination.
President Bush is trying to have it both ways when it comes to
this initiative. On one hand, the administration stresses that the
Faith-Based Initiative is about funding effective social services
programs and not endorsing religion, but it has failed to prevent
the use of government funds for religious purposes and made no systematic
effort to monitor the effectiveness of these program or rebut independent
studies finding that FBOs are at best equal to and often less effective
than secular providers.
On the other hand, the administration repeatedly promotes the
religious aspect of the program with statements by the President
that hope and a sense of purpose can be restored when someone "puts
an arm around a neighbor and says 'God loves you'" and by taking
steps such as providing a link on the HHS website instructing pastors
on sermons relating to HIV. The First Amendment prohibitions on
funding religious activities are important because, as Supreme Court
Justice Black explained, "a union of government and religion
tends to destroy government and degrade religion."
Bush has shamelessly used faith-based programs to exploit both
institutions for political gain while cloaked by the initiative's
obscurity. With this cloak now receding, Congress and the media
no longer have an excuse for allowing this exploitation to continue.
Bennet G. Kelley is an attorney and the author of "President
Bush: The False Prophet of the Christian Right" which appears in
Big Bush Lies: The 20 Most Telling Lies of President George
W. Bush (White Cloud Press 2004).
|