Lift the Media Blackout
January 5, 2004
By Vincent L. Guarisco
So, another traumatic year has come to pass. Since 2004 was a
Leap Year, we were hit with 366 nauseating days of unnecessary suffering,
death, and destruction ceaselessly searing the hearts and minds
of millions with the war in Iraq. Like many others, I am too listless
and war-weary to even attempt to imagine what new destruction this
administration is cooking up for 2005.
Who could ever forget Christmas 2004? Earthquakes and tsunamis
aside, last year, for many, Uncle Sam morphed into a millitary-uniformed
Kris Kringle. He became a new kind of special delivery, a War Santa
of cheap tin thrills; one who gave folded flags to replace lost
Can you imagine? Hearing a rap on the door, answering it, and being
handed a colorful piece of cloth to replace a vibrant, treasured
life? Nothing like having your heart ripped out for eternity over
an oil well and out-of-control greed.
Disaster comes in many forms, be it natural or unnatural. And
media sensationalism (in the battle for market shares) can sure
keep you reeling. It's amazing how the media outlets decided to
show the graphic loss of life from the killer tsunami waves - the
bodies washed ashore, many bloated as they piled up in numbers that
far outdistanced the ability of loved ones to identify and bury
them. Yet televising dead American service-members arriving home
at Dover Air Force Base in the dead of night, in neat flag-draped
coffins, is still not allowed.
Who makes these decisions? Certainly not anyone with any shred
of honor. But there it was in all its undaunted glory, in big screen,
plasma screen and wide screen - media executives giving the thumbs-up
to show bloated bodies, decomposing bodies, floating bodies and
even bodies hanging in trees - on television, dumped squarely into
my living room. Strange, isn't it, that they still refuse to televise
one single American funeral at home honoring our heros who have
died in the line of duty, while bravely serving their country in
a time of war. What the hell is wrong with this picture?
I suspect there is an underlying explanation for this. Is it bad
for the selling points of war to show such images? Is our society
purposely being shielded from such upsetting details of homebound
fatalities because the Makers of War want us to have a more pleasant,
picturesque impression of war without the imagery of loss and death?
Is it a full-blown media blackout, acting as a nerve block for the
masses? Is that why they say, "out of sight, out of mind?"
If so, we better consider the price - because our loss is very
real. Otherwise, becoming a casualty of war is not the final sacrifice;
it is merely an insult before closing the last cryptic page - a
dead handshake, a zipper bag and a silent homecoming so as not to
scare away future recruiting efforts and replacements.
Suffering is Widespread
American soldiers are not the only ones suffering and dying out
there without the public noticing. The New Year began just like
the Old Year ended - with Iraq's landscape continuing to be smeared
with glossy red puddles of spilled blood oozing from the many scattered
dead. An Iraqi civilian population worn thin, battle fatigued, being
relentlessly extinguished while reeling in agony with the putrid
scent of death floating all around them, fouling the very air they
breathe. And don't forget about that U-235 depleted uranium dust
they are forced to inhale and ingest in their lungs along with that
foul stench. Can you imagine it? Try it sometime - it's a poisonous
sobering experience of life in a hellhole.
However, through it all, the Iraqi people unceasingly continue
to pray for God's help. Yep, enemy and civilians alike, regardless
of who is fighting or not fighting, they are all God's people too.
They pray to their prophet daily for spiritual salvation, for redemption
in the wake of wanton destruction. They pray to God to save them
from the so-called "liberators" who have invaded their home.
Some may call it religious sectarianism, but don't be fooled by
the terminology. If there is an Allah, he must be listening, because
he seems to have given the insurgents (acronym for freedom fighters),
a Mount-Zion sized amount of tenacity to resist. They certainly
are in a motivated Jihad mode for who and what they hate - American
occupation, American-style democracy, American-run elections and
any form of American puppet government we may feebly attempt to
instill. To them, we are godless infidels who have come thousands
of miles to steal their natural resources and to destroy their sacred
way of life. Still think we can win? In Las Vegas we call that long-shot
a "sucker bet."
Does God answer some prayers and not others? Bush has publicly
stated that God whispers in his ear (his approval) on whom Bush
decides to attack in war. However, if you remember, that pithy wisdom
didn't jive very well with the Pope in Rome. In fact, just before
we invaded, the Pope warned the United States, "If you go to war
in Iraq, you go without God."
Okay, I'm a little confused on this. Who are we supposed to believe?
Who is God's agent - Bush or the Pope? Hmmm, let me see. It's either
the guy who resides in Washington D.C. on 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
- the same guy who blundered into a war-profiteering crusade, and
likes to brag he's a "war president," - or it's the guy from the
Vatican in Rome who unwaveringly promotes world peace. Gee, I'm
The Questions Keep Coming
Here at home, with a much more peaceful landscape at our disposal,
many of us continue to worry about how long our soldiers will remain
in foreign battlefields fighting this unsanctioned, illegal and
quite possibly Godless war. In fact, just the other day, surprisingly,
a Bush-supporting co-worker sarcastically asked me how much longer
I thought we would be in Iraq.
I paused for a brief moment before responding, "Hey ace, that's
simple! Your man GW has an exit plan! You betcha - we're gonna stop
pillaging and dying over there and will bring the troops home just
as soon as each and every one of those oil wells starts pumping
seawater!" I knew it would only confuse him to mention the
real reasons - profiteering spoils of war, no bid open-ended contracts
for nation building, the construction of military bases, privatized
troop support, the arms race, just to name a few.
Perhaps I shouldn't have said it, but the look on his face was
truly a Kodak moment. Pro-war supporters love to boast that the
colors of true patriotism - red white and blue - are the colors
that never run. On the contrary, watch what happens to a mother's
make-up after being told that her son or daughter has died in war.
Or perhaps a wife receiving the same news about a husband, or a
child about a parent. Yeah, watch the colors run then; they literally
bleed with sorrow and, sometimes, with rage so strong that it creates
a river of mournful tears.
Am I being cynical? Perhaps. But that's what happens when one
gets continually fogged with media-induced bullshit and bombarded
with official lies without end. After getting traumatized and betrayed
so often, you become a little more cynical with each dying day.
Five killed here, 12 lost there... every day more body bags pile
up; more innocents lie unattended in the streets, mutilated by foraging
packs of dogs... After a while it chips away at your very soul.
I call cynicism my own personal safety feature. It's better that
I am cynically safe than stark raving mad.
It's Time for the Killing to Stop
Bottom line - I refuse to be hypnotized; desensitized by the state
to prevent me from putting a human face on what is happening all
around me. It's the media's duty to report it. I demand to know
everything. It's within my right to harness that energy, to use
that same energy to prevent any further bloodshed.
In September of 2003, I wrote an article
published on the Veterans for Peace website titled: "Body bags filled
with GI Joe and Jane." This essay was written in the early stages
of the Iraq war. At the time it was published, approximately 300
soldiers had been slaughtered. Currently, a thousand more (and counting)
have died since then. I said it then and I'll say it again:
On the surface, it may seem cruel to advocate this, but for the
love of life, we must immediately start televising dead and mutilated
sons, daughters, uncles, aunts, husbands, wives and friends arriving
home in gift-wrapped body bags. Only then will the appeal of the
selling points of war and hostile occupation diminish. The injured
and dead must appear on television. The media must televise the
reality of what this war is about: the flag draped caskets, the
funerals, the grieving, the pain, the crying, and the destruction.
It must be shown immediately. It must.
As long as Bush's mandated media blackout is allowed to remain
in place, his self-serving wars will continue non-stop. Without
media attention, there will be no cause and effect, no sense of
loss, and therefore no public backlash for accountability.
Remember this: During the Vietnam War, when the Mothers of America
marched in the streets in Washington D.C., the media coverage afforded
that event was crucial, even instrumental, in ending the war. Bush
lied and our soldiers have died and continue to die, every hour,
every day. I do not believe for one minute that they will mind being
exploited in the name of peace. After all, it was a falsely propagated
war that killed them in the first place. Other lives are depending
on us - not the media, not the administration - so, for the love
of God, please demand that the funerals and flag-draped coffins
be put before the American public. Let us demand an end to the killing.
Vincent L Guarisco is a freelance writer from Bullhead City,
Arizona, a contributing writer for many web sites, and a lifetime
founding member of the Alliance of Atomic Veterans. Replies welcomed