You happened to run across a "trollish" 2-day-old thread minutes after my other post was hidden by jury? OK, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.
Did you notice in the "trollish" thread how I apologized to the poster after we conversed? Did you see how we conversed in a civil manner and re-shaped eachother's original opinions?
I suspected that you saw what you needed to see to confirm your suspicion and ignored any evidence to the contrary. My bad. Just don't see how it was "trollish".
In the post that was hidden, my subject line said essentially "this is how they will respond" then my post made a self-righteous demand on Obama to not use the word "Medicare" in his ads. I still don't understand how 6 people don't get it. Again, obviously, my bad.
Also not sure why a jury wouldn't be given the opportunity to hear from the "defendant" or why the defendant wouldn't be afforded the opportunity to adjust his post for clarification before being labeled a "hideous troll" among other things. Doesn't seem very progressive to me and, frankly, has had me pissed off all day.
So, in summary, if you are not a stalker or self-appointed troll police, I apologize. Time will tell.