Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

History of Feminism

(41,976 posts)

28. That's what I mean about her being a worthy discussion

Sat Dec 8, 2012, 09:46 PM

Dec 2012

I abhor objectivism, but Rand and her life are kind of fascinating. She would despise modern feminism. I think she would relate more to MRA's.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is this a good group for feminism as a historical theory? [View all] Deep13 Dec 2012 OP

ok. lol. nt seabeyond Dec 2012 #1

So it is, then? Deep13 Dec 2012 #2

groovy Deep13 Dec 2012 #4

i was going to check out the names you gave tomorrow. thanks.... seabeyond Dec 2012 #5

bell? mzteris Dec 2012 #13

they are indeed. Deep13 Dec 2012 #18

a thread on bell hooks seabeyond Dec 2012 #22

thanks Deep13 Dec 2012 #27

Ir seems you and I mzteris Dec 2012 #30

Well, I'll be glad to listen and learn anyhow! LiberalLoner Dec 2012 #6

It is ismnotwasm Dec 2012 #7

Gerda Lerner's The Creation of Patriarchy? zazen Dec 2012 #8

There are many posts here with links to classic feminist papers eridani Dec 2012 #9

ha... so back to the lock thread. this is what i am saying, lol... seabeyond Dec 2012 #10

I think discussion surrounding boston bean Dec 2012 #11

I think Boston Bean said it quite well... hlthe2b Dec 2012 #12

Yeah, I'm not a huge fan of Butler ismnotwasm Dec 2012 #14

ten to one the reason they said she was a feminist boston bean Dec 2012 #15

Exactly ismnotwasm Dec 2012 #16

Agreed, boston bean Dec 2012 #17

you are right, much of it revolves around the degrees boston bean Dec 2012 #25

but is she talking about her father. seabeyond Dec 2012 #20

That's what I mean about her being a worthy discussion ismnotwasm Dec 2012 #28

agree. nt seabeyond Dec 2012 #29

It revolves around her theory of gender performance. boston bean Dec 2012 #21

Already read it. Deep13 Dec 2012 #26