Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Seriously, what idiot in the administration thought it would be a good idea to [View all]shanen
(349 posts)40. No, the target of the lawsuit should be the director and others
I was thinking the same thing. I believe that the actors have to sign releases for the use of their faces in any film, and those releases were clearly obtained under false pretenses. Any and all of the actors should revoke their permissions, and also sue the bastard who lied to them. Whether or not it can be carried up to the producers and funders of the film is also an interesting question, but I definitely think this is NOT a First Amendment issue. Well, actually it is, but there are limitations even on the First Amendment. I think this goes under the "Fire" in a crowded theater scenario, but it might be better to look for legal liability for lies. I actually doubt they could pursue a slander case against the Prophet...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Seriously, what idiot in the administration thought it would be a good idea to [View all]
Fgiriun
Sep 2012
OP
Probably an idiot that doesn't realize once something is online, it's there for good. nt
Comrade_McKenzie
Sep 2012
#9
Maybe because our President doesn't CARE about the political repercussions, but about Americans
progressivebydesign
Sep 2012
#36