2016 Postmortem

Catherina

(35,568 posts)

25. Yep. And "the candidate would not meet with the protesters"

Sat Oct 31, 2015, 01:01 AM

Oct 2015

Nick Merrill, a spokesman for Clinton, said the candidate would not meet with the protesters.

After walking off stage, Clinton was met by LaDavia Drane, her director of African-American outreach.

"It's always an adventure," Clinton proclaimed.

Speaking to CNN after the event, Lewis said he believes the protesters "represent another time, another period."

"It is unfortunate that they didn't listen to the secretary," he added.

http://edition.cnn.com/2015/10/30/politics/hillary-clinton-black-lives-matter/

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

380 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Stop the train! Am I reading this right? [View all] Bonobo Oct 2015 OP

They know that this is a misstep in Hillary's campaign Rosa Luxemburg Oct 2015 #1

Your jury results.. I am Juror #6 Cha Oct 2015 #12

I can't believe it was even alerted on. zeemike Oct 2015 #22

Anything that contradicts the talking points is alerted on. Mostly the alerts don't succeed. sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #66

is this a new yuiyoshida Oct 2015 #276

Nope. Over a month ago there was a post on another site by someone named George II cui bono Oct 2015 #279

How can they have their own juries yuiyoshida Oct 2015 #284

There are ways to be sure you are not eliminated from the jury selection pool. cui bono Oct 2015 #294

How about Reply 40? Bit of irony there, eh, wot, old chum? merrily Oct 2015 #76

Unbelievable. zeemike Oct 2015 #124

+1 nt Live and Learn Oct 2015 #132

Yes, that is a good word for it. They forget that they will have to come begging for sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #207

I think they count on the fear factor. zeemike Oct 2015 #224

Yet they have no explanation as to how Hillary is going to get things passed when the profess that cui bono Oct 2015 #281

And when she loses, Kelvin Mace Oct 2015 #231

That's why they keep begging loyalty oaths now JackInGreen Oct 2015 #266

But the meme is that it's Bernie supporters who are the big meanies jfern Oct 2015 #308

Projection is a strategy zeemike Oct 2015 #311

They really, really don't like their hatred exposed. polly7 Oct 2015 #127

I'd love to see the jury results, woudn't you? merrily Oct 2015 #174

I sure would. polly7 Oct 2015 #181

If I had participated in that jury, I wouldn't be so quick to post the results. merrily Oct 2015 #185

True that. I'd love to see the alerter's comments though ... polly7 Oct 2015 #188

I've seen a couple that were probably as bad. Don't think I've seen worse. merrily Oct 2015 #191

Their desparation is getting worse. Since there are apparently zero issues they will discuss rhett o rick Oct 2015 #89

+10 whathehell Oct 2015 #104

its starting to get ridiculous Locrian Oct 2015 #119

Calling Hillary Clinton supporters "scalded cats" isn't offensive to you Sanders supporters? BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #131

No. Not really. Not at all. peacebird Oct 2015 #136

Well, this season, we ARE separating the wheat from the chaff, so... BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #139

Triangulated Wheat Crop, in which the New Democrats are separating from the Left by DhhD Oct 2015 #151

No. Democratic Wheat Crop - separating true Democrats from the "sometimes" ones. BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #155

In the Matter and Energy, there are three particles to Plans and Policies. DhhD Oct 2015 #208

When people try picking apart an argument down to the atom, I always revert to this: BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #210

LOL! polly7 Oct 2015 #137

LOL! BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #142

No it's NOT the same difference! polly7 Oct 2015 #147

Yeah, it is. BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #150

Lol. Like I said ....... only if you NEED it to be. polly7 Oct 2015 #182

Lol. Like I advised...wait until those stormy winds die down and you'll BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #193

Oh good grief, once the 'stormy winds die down', I doubt I'll be able to raise polly7 Oct 2015 #198

I've said more than I cared to on this subject, and I have NO desire to veer off BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #213

Well that was kind! ... thank you, I believe yours is also. polly7 Oct 2015 #216

It's how I really feel, polly7. BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #220

No it's not. zeemike Oct 2015 #144

I've noticed. But I guess it's ok. People need to be more charitable when they're BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #146

You mean the right to speak freely is a charitable grant? zeemike Oct 2015 #170

You know that's not what I meant. A simple reread of my post BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #172

Well glad to know that zeemike Oct 2015 #175

Glad to have helpe clear that up for you. BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #196

"You are a scalded cat." "You're running around like a scalded cat." cherokeeprogressive Oct 2015 #237

So you hate cats? Divernan Oct 2015 #242

Did I say I did? eom BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #247

Not as offensive as homophobic remarks at one's political adversaries Prism Oct 2015 #244

Ahh...post-stalking, I see. BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #248

Nah, people just remember things Prism Oct 2015 #254

Yep. Puglover Oct 2015 #264

Well, look at this week Prism Oct 2015 #267

Jesus H. Christ. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #277

Read it again. bvar22 Oct 2015 #272

I have. It makes it no less offensive. BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #290

Speaking of petulant children Doctor_J Oct 2015 #306

Nobody on the Internet can offend me. I laugh at the anthics of the Hillary supporters. bvar22 Oct 2015 #315

You know, if Team Hillary were not permitted to insult, stranger81 Oct 2015 #273

Odd. But this is exactly the complaint I hear from fellow Hillary Clinton supporters of BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #302

It's really hypocritical to bring it up unless you have also called out Hillary supporters cui bono Oct 2015 #288

It's not hypocritical because Sanders supporters don't waste time pointing it out, as you have done, BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #295

Hypocrisy is hypocrisy, what it is doesn't change by what anyone claims it is or is not. cui bono Oct 2015 #297

On this we'll agree. BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #301

It's a figure of speech AgingAmerican Oct 2015 #343

It's like being back in grade school. L0oniX Oct 2015 #336

Post removed Post removed Oct 2015 #40

I always think of the "Going Native" episode of South Park when I see that "mahalo". Bonobo Oct 2015 #43

It appears that the truth hurts n/t hootinholler Oct 2015 #98

Only as "it" confronts the lies. n/t fredamae Oct 2015 #103

Well, it sure hurts the alerters in this thread, anyway... MrMickeysMom Oct 2015 #112

That's a hell of a hide, isn't it? merrily Oct 2015 #200

I'm guessing at least one juror doesn't/didn't know the whole story Babel_17 Nov 2015 #369

I once made a post so sarcastic that I actually decided against using the sarcasm emote because I merrily Nov 2015 #370

Yeah, I felt bad about my vote on that one too Babel_17 Nov 2015 #371

No, please don't delete. It made me smile. merrily Nov 2015 #372

I love this episode! ybbor Oct 2015 #100

Hawaiians were the head of the DLC. I believe it was shut down in a hide attempt. DhhD Oct 2015 #158

Somebody REALLY doesnt want people to see that screencap that Manny linked to. Warren DeMontague Oct 2015 #319

Which screen cap? opiate69 Oct 2015 #326

Speaking of unexpected paranormal apparitions! Warren DeMontague Nov 2015 #359

Happy halloween to you too, ami! opiate69 Nov 2015 #361

And lo, doth the alert stalking begennith Scootaloo Oct 2015 #44

So appropriate for Halloween. Enthusiast Oct 2015 #72

Wish it were MORE like a horror movie JackInGreen Oct 2015 #74

It begunneth a good while ago, but, yea, it continueth, even nigh unto Reply 40. merrily Oct 2015 #78

Smh marym625 Oct 2015 #219

If it weren't for the primary, I'd consider making a link to that post my sig line. merrily Oct 2015 #221

LOL! marym625 Oct 2015 #222

Ha ha ha ha ha artislife Oct 2015 #47

Petty personal attacks seem to be the only quiver in some people's arsenal. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #95

I love what MamaDSB taught you Control-Z Nov 2015 #379

Good explanation Cha riversedge Oct 2015 #105

Your posting of the jury decision confuses me packman Oct 2015 #125

Allow me to explain: hosts can only lock the original post. Warren Stupidity Oct 2015 #166

The whine could also get "juried" and then hidden. merrily Oct 2015 #203

OK luvspeas Oct 2015 #128

Thank you for being a biased juror. That was very revealing. Flying Phoenix Oct 2015 #161

By definition, jurors are biased. n/t ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #223

Absolutely not. cui bono Oct 2015 #305

If they don't develp a bias, how do they ever reach a decision? ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #310

No. Bias is a precondition, not a conclusion based on objective analysis. cui bono Oct 2015 #321

Bias is not always a pre-condition ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #333

I'm choking on the irony. cherokeeprogressive Oct 2015 #215

Ridiculous that it was called out. Perogie Oct 2015 #263

Juror #5.... lmao!!! the hypocrisy... cui bono Oct 2015 #278

"Leave your fellow DU'ers alone"- like the other day when a 20 post newbie called me a Republican? Warren DeMontague Oct 2015 #317

Right on, Warren. polly7 Oct 2015 #320

Remeber, though, I got my "ass handed to me" Warren DeMontague Oct 2015 #323

I thought she was "inherently amoral"? arcane1 Nov 2015 #376

Hell, normal cats are hard enough to herd!! pocoloco Oct 2015 #18

you haven't opened a can of tuna lately have you? passiveporcupine Oct 2015 #62

Oooooo, I like that!! Bohunk68 Oct 2015 #93

Agreed...cats are only hard to herd when you don't know what they want. Volaris Oct 2015 #109

Some much prefer the stick to the carrot. n/t A Simple Game Oct 2015 #121

I see the helpful Juror beneath you is upset Hydra Oct 2015 #29

+1 for accuracy in reporting. Enthusiast Oct 2015 #71

How was it a misstep? NaturalHigh Oct 2015 #173

Young Black people asking police to stop killing them are jerks to you, no surprise. randys1 Oct 2015 #179

When people act like jerks, I have no problem calling them such. NaturalHigh Oct 2015 #190

What better opportunity for them to get their message out polly7 Oct 2015 #195

Did you express the same feelings when Hillary supporters were attacking Sanders cui bono Oct 2015 #289

Yes. NaturalHigh Oct 2015 #292

Good on you for consistency. cui bono Oct 2015 #299

They know that this is a misstep in Hillary's campaign snort Oct 2015 #187

I believe you nailed it, Bonobo. Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #2

+1 MissDeeds Oct 2015 #11

yeah the personality cult is getting more revolting by the day Doctor_J Oct 2015 #3

So it's not just me..... daleanime Oct 2015 #4

Sigh Armstead Oct 2015 #6

Cloud KooKoo Land visits DU. Fuddnik Oct 2015 #14

"The instigator is a former Sanders supporter" MissDeeds Oct 2015 #17

All I can do now is laugh at the Hill supporters. 840high Oct 2015 #19

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service frylock Oct 2015 #33

Another good jury. nt artislife Oct 2015 #49

"No one has called Sanders a racist!" Scootaloo Oct 2015 #59

I wonder if they will get what you just said. JimDandy Oct 2015 #102

Yeah, is there a flowchart handy? frylock Oct 2015 #167

well yesterday one of the de facto leaders of the Clinton supporters posted that he Doctor_J Oct 2015 #87

Dear Alerter.... did you also alert on the OP in the HRC group that called Bernie supporters cui bono Oct 2015 #293

This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Oct 2015 #36

Just you wait until the federal investigation into the "threatening" mail is complete. DisgustipatedinCA Oct 2015 #37

These kinds of accusations against other DUers are getting to be a pattern with you. stevenleser Oct 2015 #42

I don't trust the source nt artislife Oct 2015 #50

In a few years, he will be singing his praises. nt Bonobo Oct 2015 #57

Snort! Scuba Oct 2015 #60

Here! snort Oct 2015 #197

I wasn't accusing you of anything. I was saying it outright, and it was hidden. DisgustipatedinCA Oct 2015 #68

"I am honored to be in her company." DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #134

Thank goodness you finally lost that absurd, over dramatic, solidarity pic whatchamacallit Oct 2015 #258

I kind of liked it. Maybe one day you will do something to make me honored to be in your company. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #259

Apparently spouting continuous divisive nonsense whatchamacallit Oct 2015 #261

Actually, it was for her acts of valor./nt DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #262

LOL cui bono Oct 2015 #300

I've been working a lot lately and am a little behind. Who are you talking about? nt ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #39

+1000 nt Live and Learn Oct 2015 #135

Your brush is too broad here. Agschmid Oct 2015 #5

Then please angrychair Oct 2015 #15

Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, no and no. in_cog_ni_to Oct 2015 #7

It's on fire now. Le Taz Hot Oct 2015 #156

This message was self-deleted by its author greyl Oct 2015 #8

Some have been doing this for a while jfern Oct 2015 #9

Is Hillary taking her cues from Trump? Didn't he say he'd "defend his mic from BLM", or some such? 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #10

I doubt all of Hillary's supporters would be foolish enough to do what you are seeing here. But yes, sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #13

"have now done a complete flip flop" TheFarS1de Oct 2015 #20

Lol, good point! sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #21

Zactly! MrMickeysMom Oct 2015 #115

"Nowhere to be found when Ferguson happened". I've noticed that too Sabrina. PotatoChip Oct 2015 #88

You were one of the first people to throw BLM under the bus for interrupting Sanders. NuclearDem Oct 2015 #212

ummmm ............ no. polly7 Oct 2015 #218

Yes, she did. NuclearDem Oct 2015 #225

Your link doesn't support your theory Scootaloo Oct 2015 #227

From the link: NuclearDem Oct 2015 #229

I suggest readign the link in thorough. Scootaloo Oct 2015 #233

There was a group of people who supported BLM from the beginning, regardless of who they criticized. NuclearDem Oct 2015 #236

And there are a lot of people who are only VERY SUDDENLY interested in Black Lives Matter. Scootaloo Oct 2015 #238

They've actually started a thread in a protected forum passiveporcupine Oct 2015 #16

Well that's how you know how little the ISSUE itself matters to them. IF it did, they would have sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #24

I will NOT forget the ugliness that still hasn't stopped passiveporcupine Oct 2015 #27

They will be coming to us demanding our votes, they have done so already, IF she should win sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #30

You are not alone. GoneFishin Oct 2015 #45

Not even. Enthusiast Oct 2015 #75

That stuff hangs around for a long time. HubertHeaver Oct 2015 #53

Those put on my ignore list will NOT get off of it. stillwaiting Oct 2015 #77

I haven't put anyone on it yet but after the primary every single poster Live and Learn Oct 2015 #143

I just wish posters on the Ignore list were invisible on the home page, too magical thyme Oct 2015 #162

You are far from alone. 99Forever Oct 2015 #84

Me, too... MrMickeysMom Oct 2015 #335

I know why...2008. They know if there is slippage in minority support the Jinga will tumble TheKentuckian Oct 2015 #97

Too many real details artislife Oct 2015 #52

I did not realize the thread is in a protected forum Doctor_J Oct 2015 #92

I never suggested anyone alert on that thread passiveporcupine Oct 2015 #287

Same here. Doctor_J Oct 2015 #296

I don't really agree with protected groups either. cui bono Oct 2015 #303

Of course they are Jack Rabbit Oct 2015 #23

Yep. And "the candidate would not meet with the protesters" Catherina Oct 2015 #25

Represent another time, another period? Flying Squirrel Oct 2015 #28

What, like the 60s? frylock Oct 2015 #34

I, too, lost respect for Lewis after reading that. senz Oct 2015 #130

Haha, but you know we'll hear it. The spin cycle's on high n/t Catherina Oct 2015 #35

and how many times did we hear "Bernie left! Bernie cancelled the meeting!" marym625 Oct 2015 #48

The meeting was scheduled for after a night time netroots event in AZ, and Bernie had two rallies merrily Oct 2015 #96

Nope. And the blind loyalty to some politicians is frightening marym625 Oct 2015 #180

I don't see it as blind loyalty. I see it as perceived self interest. merrily Oct 2015 #183

whatever it is, it's not logical. n/t marym625 Oct 2015 #189

Wow. Thanks for that link. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2015 #81

John Lewis said that??? cui bono Oct 2015 #307

well at the very least now we know the wheels are coming off MisterP Oct 2015 #26

What I get from all of this is that only 'certain' Black people's opinions matter, polly7 Oct 2015 #61

+1 nt Live and Learn Oct 2015 #145

It's more than a little insane Hydra Oct 2015 #31

True, if you want someone who actually cares about racism and other discrimination jfern Oct 2015 #67

! Bernie cares. She doesn't. senz Oct 2015 #140

It is truly spectacular, but not at all surprising.. frylock Oct 2015 #32

Bernie "looked annoyed" how dare he azurnoir Oct 2015 #38

Yes, maybe he should be alerted on. whathehell Oct 2015 #107

Sanders is a racist for respecting. Clinton is amazing for arresting. nt mhatrw Oct 2015 #41

You !! FTW nt artislife Oct 2015 #55

Nailed it. nt LWolf Nov 2015 #364

Well you know, Bonobo. She DOES "Share the Faith" Scootaloo Oct 2015 #46

+1 More: Clinton speaks of "a higher calling among those who have faith" Catherina Oct 2015 #51

I thought mentioning MLK was not okay anymore? merrily Oct 2015 #80

That's what I thought, too ybbor Oct 2015 #106

Different now or different who? merrily Oct 2015 #110

I guess both ybbor Oct 2015 #228

Bernie doesn't talk explicitly about love and kindness . . . freedom fighter jh Oct 2015 #82

Coming from her senz Oct 2015 #153

a wink is as good as a nod to a blind bat marym625 Oct 2015 #54

It isn't! merrily Oct 2015 #79

no, it was me being tired and writing "nudge" instead of "nod" marym625 Oct 2015 #123

We both got it wrong. It was another Marily thing. merrily Oct 2015 #176

oh, that silly Marily! marym625 Oct 2015 #186

Ultimately, Jews are seen as deniers of the messiah by some. Bonobo Oct 2015 #56

i love when people tell me they'll pray for me. Scootaloo Oct 2015 #58

I'll have to remember that passiveporcupine Oct 2015 #65

I feel the same senz Oct 2015 #154

My retort to, "I'll pray for you," Le Taz Hot Oct 2015 #164

My retort Aerows Oct 2015 #298

My oh my will my schadenfreude be enormous. bravenak Oct 2015 #312

It'll match your hypocrisy, then. Scootaloo Oct 2015 #340

Nice scoot. bravenak Oct 2015 #341

What? Scootaloo Oct 2015 #342

Did I cheer about frogmarching at any time? bravenak Oct 2015 #344

You made a big ol' OP about how amazeballs Clinton was with it. Scootaloo Oct 2015 #345

So that is 'CHEERING FROGMARCHING'? bravenak Oct 2015 #346

Well, the frogmarching happened, and you seem to still be cheering. Scootaloo Oct 2015 #349

I never cheered frogmarching once! I cheered the fact the she agreed with the sentiment rather than bravenak Oct 2015 #350

The frogmarch happened. You cheered. Scootaloo Oct 2015 #352

You mean when blacks chanted down another group of blacks? You do know they were not BLM? bravenak Oct 2015 #353

So the value of their voice is dependant on their hashtag? Scootaloo Oct 2015 #354

I cannot choose one group of blacks who are trying to fight profiling over the group bringing bravenak Oct 2015 #356

Sanders has more courage in his little finger than all of our Reps put together. That's why they are sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #63

For those who want to know what this is about-- eridani Oct 2015 #64

CLINTON'S REMOVAL OF BLM PROTESTERS... MrMickeysMom Oct 2015 #116

Clinton's hard, hawkish views on war and death penalty senz Oct 2015 #157

If you to ask me where Clinton stands... tex-wyo-dem Oct 2015 #234

K & R !!! WillyT Oct 2015 #69

Bonobo, there is no sense of consistency or even a shred of intellectual honesty. Enthusiast Oct 2015 #70

.....! KoKo Oct 2015 #141

One thing I have noticed for years about some of those who now post a lot in support Clinton: Vattel Oct 2015 #73

As DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #138

You have no idea how sincere we are, do you? senz Oct 2015 #159

Some of the most grievous crimes in the annals of history were committed by those... DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #199

DSB, when we look for honesty in presidential candidates senz Oct 2015 #209

attacks on her AlbertCat Oct 2015 #192

I am not going to respond because... DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #202

My attack was on "some" unidentified supporters of Clinton. Vattel Oct 2015 #201

Calling someone "intellectually dishonest" doesn't seem like praise, does it? DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #204

when the object of my attack is not identified, it's not a personal attack, is it? Vattel Oct 2015 #205

Calling someone intellectually dishonest is/isn't a personal attack? DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #206

Not if I just say that some unidentified people are dishonest. Vattel Oct 2015 #211

The reference was to the supporters of a a specific Democratic candidate DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #214

You seriously don't get the distinction I am drawing? Vattel Oct 2015 #235

you don't get the distinction between some and all? passiveporcupine Oct 2015 #304

None, some, all Aerows Nov 2015 #362

The cognitive dissonance on this site just keep growing and growing. cui bono Oct 2015 #324

The stench of Libertarians are all over this OP. stonecutter357 Oct 2015 #83

Then you should go back to that other thread and defend your DOMA revisionism and your smearing Bluenorthwest Oct 2015 #108

you are not being very Honest stonecutter357 Oct 2015 #111

You replied to the wrong post. The dishonest post 83 was above the one your replied to (nt) LostOne4Ever Oct 2015 #194

What a nonsensical thing to say. nt Live and Learn Oct 2015 #148

"Libertarians" ??? You don't even know what the word means. senz Oct 2015 #160

This should be flagged for insulting Libertarians. Perogie Oct 2015 #265

No, I don't think it's got anything to do with "libertarians", really. sibelian Oct 2015 #347

"the curious incident of the dog in the nighttime" Babel_17 Oct 2015 #85

You nailed it, my friend. Aerows Nov 2015 #363

It's been noted, and that being done, I guess we move on Babel_17 Nov 2015 #365

Words can be weapons ;) Aerows Nov 2015 #367

Yes, I applaud her for standing up to the protesters. NaturalHigh Oct 2015 #86

^^^ THIS. Exactly this^^^ Persondem Oct 2015 #165

But it WASN'T wrong when Sanders was interrupted by BLM.. frylock Oct 2015 #178

I was just told to stfu. nt. druidity33 Oct 2015 #243

I can kind of see both sides of this. RichVRichV Oct 2015 #280

hillary people know it's bad wendylaroux Oct 2015 #90

She is a center right "So called" Democrat. Madmiddle Oct 2015 #91

No need to stop the train, we read it right Autumn Oct 2015 #94

In fairness, merrily Oct 2015 #113

When you consider the actions of the audience at the Bernie event Autumn Oct 2015 #120

I agree. merrily Oct 2015 #122

The trumped up sexism charges were obvious from the get go and we know where that originated Autumn Oct 2015 #129

You got that right. cui bono Oct 2015 #331

Do you equate 'Hillary supporters' with a dozen or so posters on DU? randome Oct 2015 #99

Hillary supporters equate Sanders supporters with a few posters on DU Autumn Oct 2015 #114

Since we are talking about the hypocrisy as evidenced on DU, Live and Learn Oct 2015 #149

It's disrespectful -again,IMO- to refer to a woman by her first name... randome Oct 2015 #249

Your post comes across as sexist to me. nt Live and Learn Oct 2015 #250

Not sexism, deflection. RichVRichV Oct 2015 #285

I called is sexist because she claimed it is ONLY disrespectful to call a woman by her first name. Live and Learn Oct 2015 #358

Hillary is known by her first name because it distinguishes her from her husband. passiveporcupine Oct 2015 #309

This message was self-deleted by its author Marty McGraw Oct 2015 #269

and since two Marty McGraw Oct 2015 #270

In answer to your last question. Puglover Oct 2015 #101

Some people just need a strong(wo)man to rally behind. Jester Messiah Oct 2015 #117

Self-protective herd behavior. Lowest common denominator. senz Oct 2015 #163

The Answer To All Of The Questions Is YES cantbeserious Oct 2015 #118

This sudden wave of "support" is facinating Bobbie Jo Oct 2015 #126

Yeah,the real scandal of the Bernie/BLM protest seems sufrommich Oct 2015 #133

What silliness. A few 'white' (which is probably a guess) supporters (also a guess) advance Live and Learn Oct 2015 #152

Wow!! What a bunch of Faux Outrage. Get a grip. Persondem Oct 2015 #168

It's unavoidable: Bernie's down with BLM. Hillary isn't. senz Oct 2015 #169

it's those pesky thirdway progressives stupidicus Oct 2015 #171

Down the Rabbit Hole it seems. glinda Oct 2015 #177

No. modestybl Oct 2015 #184

Of course Robbins Oct 2015 #217

Love your essay, Bonobo libodem Oct 2015 #226

While she has many positive qualities, consistency is not Hillary's strong suit Depaysement Oct 2015 #230

New DUers, sporting an H, are dropping giant steaming mounds of troll shit everywhere whatchamacallit Oct 2015 #232

I guess I qualify as a new Duer. I have never said anything against any other candidate. Tipperary Oct 2015 #241

Right... whatchamacallit Oct 2015 #252

Tsk tsk. Tipperary Oct 2015 #256

Haha... whatchamacallit Oct 2015 #260

You are very welcome. Tipperary Oct 2015 #274

And you carry on with whatchamacallit Oct 2015 #282

Massive hypocrisy of mammoth proportions on dsplay, though to be honest, I am not surprised sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #239

Nope got it all wrong ismnotwasm Oct 2015 #240

It's like watching a quarter of the board having an "apologist" moment Prism Oct 2015 #245

Innit? Puglover Oct 2015 #251

I hope to god Clinton doesn't have some kind of immigration forum coming up Prism Oct 2015 #257

She already kicked out that young latino protester a few weeks ago. cui bono Oct 2015 #329

It's absolutely nuts n/t whatchamacallit Oct 2015 #255

Many of them are horrible on social justice AND horrible on economic justice. nt stillwaiting Oct 2015 #283

I was going to say . . . Prism Oct 2015 #291

They don't give a tinker's shite about social justice. sibelian Oct 2015 #348

+1,000,000 cui bono Oct 2015 #330

Blind zealotry moondust Oct 2015 #246

Their sincerity was tested and the result was totally predictable. pa28 Oct 2015 #253

I can tell, you're as thoroughly shocked as I am, Bonobo. Zorra Oct 2015 #268

Well they defend the oligarchy's choice so they want what's bad for the country. L0oniX Oct 2015 #271

To answer your last question.... cui bono Oct 2015 #275

Ha...I must have missed that (or forgotten it already) passiveporcupine Oct 2015 #313

Look at their chosen candidate. Aerows Oct 2015 #286

Look how Sanders supporters responded to the interruption. bravenak Oct 2015 #314

That does it, Im definitely not going to vote for "Sanders supporters" in the primary! Warren DeMontague Oct 2015 #318

Sigh. bravenak Oct 2015 #322

Look, bravenak, she's probably going to win. Warren DeMontague Oct 2015 #328

I think both sides have got to drop the animosity. bravenak Oct 2015 #332

People can gloat all they want with me, if it means we have 4 more years of a D in the white house. Warren DeMontague Oct 2015 #338

+1 stonecutter357 Nov 2015 #360

Look at how you responded. cui bono Oct 2015 #325

I said some that I met were. Link to me calling all sander's supporters white supremacists? bravenak Oct 2015 #327

Eurasia has always been at war with Eastasia. Warren DeMontague Oct 2015 #316

It's Double Plus ungood. n/t Aerows Nov 2015 #366

Welcome to the bizarro world of Hillary support AgingAmerican Oct 2015 #334

I'm sure the oligarchy is getting a lot of entertainment value out of their chosen candidate... L0oniX Oct 2015 #337

K&R. Bernie 2016!!! n/t ion_theory Oct 2015 #339

They don't give a tinker's shite about fuck all. sibelian Oct 2015 #351

FYI Duckhunter935 Nov 2015 #368

This. Puglover Nov 2015 #374

You truly have a way with words, sibelian. Zorra Nov 2015 #375

Jury Results oneshooter Nov 2015 #378

Not to mention that she wants to keep the Death Penalty and we know how those Todays_Illusion Oct 2015 #355

We do. nt LWolf Nov 2015 #373

Post removed Post removed Oct 2015 #357

It's a simple formula: Everything she does is 100% right. Even if she did the opposite a day ago. arcane1 Nov 2015 #377

Personally I have no problems with protesters getting thrown out. NobodyHere Nov 2015 #380