Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
51. Full-speed ahead, Hillary, damn the torpedoes and the icebergs, and the rock jetty to starboard.
Sat Oct 10, 2015, 01:38 PM
Oct 2015

We have the biggest ship, and you still have the lead, damnit, increase the throttles. Full power! Give the passengers a real thrill . . . what was that noise? Oooops.



Clinton down 10 points in one week [View all] left-of-center2012 Oct 2015 OP
Reuters online poll is held in low regard by Nate Silver Sliceo Oct 2015 #1
This was same as a phone poll. n/t ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #2
No it wasn't Godhumor Oct 2015 #4
Yes it was. ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #5
Because that is what the "poll" is Godhumor Oct 2015 #6
Again, where do you get that it is an online poll? ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #8
Here wyldwolf Oct 2015 #9
There's an enormous difference between using online surveys and it being an 'online poll'. ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #10
Have fun with it. Mitt Romney and his supporters did. wyldwolf Oct 2015 #11
What does that non-sequitur have to do with anything? n/t ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #12
Because Romney's crew believed these... intersectionality Oct 2015 #15
You're suggesting that Reuter's numbers are incorrect? ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #18
Give it up. Godhumor is right. It is an online poll. No phones at all Sliceo Oct 2015 #59
No, he's not correct, and neither are you. ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #62
That's the same thing I said Sliceo Oct 2015 #76
I'm just fine, and that not 'the same thing I said'. ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #78
You wrote "This was a phone poll" oberliner Oct 2015 #81
No, it exposes a brain cramp. ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #84
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2015 #91
Thank you for the information. I thought this was wrong to begin with. Laser102 Oct 2015 #19
Same Nate Silver who predicted Scott Walker would get GOP nom? HooptieWagon Oct 2015 #14
When did he predict that? Sliceo Oct 2015 #77
This is a lie oberliner Oct 2015 #82
Is that the same Nate Silver Le Taz Hot Oct 2015 #21
Nope. That was someone on his staff. Adrahil Oct 2015 #26
Just like it was someone on Hillary's staff who ordered the backup server to overwrite data leveymg Oct 2015 #29
What? Adrahil Oct 2015 #49
Movement in a deep downward shift for Clinton, and a one hell of a jump for Bernie. Time_Lord Oct 2015 #60
We shall see. It could happen. But I doubt it. Adrahil Oct 2015 #66
You'd be amazed... Time_Lord Oct 2015 #67
His rise is not out of line with previous "insurgent" candidates. Adrahil Oct 2015 #74
Some of this Sander support is starting to look like FUD and acting like it too uponit7771 Oct 2015 #75
"Sanders has plateaued" left-of-center2012 Oct 2015 #42
Well, that's what the data shows.... Adrahil Oct 2015 #48
This is also a lie oberliner Oct 2015 #83
This was a phone poll. And if they contacted people who do not use landlines sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #43
To be fair, she'd just seen a small bump moving her up against challengers. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2015 #3
Online poll? JaneyVee Oct 2015 #7
Apparently a "survey" with a "credibility interval" of + or - 4.5....not even an on-line poll! Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #13
I know nothing about Bayesian statistics magical thyme Oct 2015 #23
Possibly she did go down.... Adrahil Oct 2015 #27
Just last week all the rage was a "survey" claiming Sanders leads in all 50 states! Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #33
Explain the science behind polls re Primary Candidates that include people who are not running? sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #44
How can I put this more succinctly and clearly? Let me borrow a phrase, modified: Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #46
How can I put this succintly? I do not like h or her supporters. artislife Oct 2015 #50
Even so, the low 40's is where many of the polls have found her support to be HereSince1628 Oct 2015 #16
But their headline is written for its sensationalism - "Clinton down 10 points"!! HORROR! George II Oct 2015 #31
Polls, or no polls SmittynMo Oct 2015 #17
Her supporters can spin this any way they want Le Taz Hot Oct 2015 #20
So, is she toast? Helen Borg Oct 2015 #22
Not yet. Le Taz Hot Oct 2015 #25
Clinton Machine is on its very last legs.. Time_Lord Oct 2015 #61
Better headline: "Polls Swing 5 Points in Either Direction on a Regular Basis" DLnyc Oct 2015 #24
Another better headline: "Wild Swings in Clinton Popularity Are Within 9% 'Credibility Interval'*" Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #30
Even if Sanders sulphurdunn Oct 2015 #28
Congrats...first out of the gate with the "it is all fixed" refrain! And it is only October! Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #32
I honestly didn't expect that until late night Super Tuesday wyldwolf Oct 2015 #34
Of course you wouldn't. sulphurdunn Oct 2015 #36
your reply is completely irrelevant to the conversation. wyldwolf Oct 2015 #37
The conspiracy cards have not yet been played, but they have been shuffled and are on the table. Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #39
I referenced the 1944 Democratic Convention sulphurdunn Oct 2015 #40
So? wyldwolf Oct 2015 #45
P-l-e-a-s-e sulphurdunn Oct 2015 #57
If you have an issue with how and why Truman replaced Wallace.. wyldwolf Oct 2015 #58
I do, sulphurdunn Oct 2015 #63
You act as though Wallace had some kind of right to be FDR's veep wyldwolf Oct 2015 #70
You know what projection is? sulphurdunn Oct 2015 #72
something that in no way applies here wyldwolf Oct 2015 #73
Wallace won the first ballot sulphurdunn Oct 2015 #79
And eventually lost, as he did in the general of '48. wyldwolf Oct 2015 #85
What do you have against Henry Wallace? sulphurdunn Oct 2015 #87
other than the historical revisionism the left have created around him, nothing. wyldwolf Oct 2015 #88
Please don't put your words sulphurdunn Oct 2015 #35
If this is true, why didn't she get the nomination in '08? lunamagica Oct 2015 #47
She didn't get it in '08 sulphurdunn Oct 2015 #56
So, are you saying that Hillary legitimately won the nomination and it was taken from her? lunamagica Oct 2015 #65
What I'm saying is there is no 'rightful' nominee, sulphurdunn Oct 2015 #68
Please feel free to explain how this would happen? mythology Oct 2015 #86
You can do all sorts of things: sulphurdunn Oct 2015 #89
stay the course, Hillary FlatBaroque Oct 2015 #38
Full-speed ahead, Hillary, damn the torpedoes and the icebergs, and the rock jetty to starboard. leveymg Oct 2015 #51
Those poor passengers FlatBaroque Oct 2015 #53
Don't worry, the First Class pool has a lifeguard. We know our priorities on this cruise line. leveymg Oct 2015 #55
Touché! nt FlatBaroque Oct 2015 #69
The poll shows a promising trend: Democrats are waking up senz Oct 2015 #41
It's not clear which Hillary is polled. HooptieWagon Oct 2015 #52
"It's not clear which Hillary was polled" left-of-center2012 Oct 2015 #54
LOL. There have been more Hillarys than there are hifiguy Oct 2015 #71
Online poll, click bait screaming headline workinclasszero Oct 2015 #64
That poll is suspect.. it jumps around erratically. DCBob Oct 2015 #80
"click bait screaming headline" left-of-center2012 Oct 2015 #90
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Clinton down 10 points in...»Reply #51