Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)IT Staffer who set-up Hillary's private email server is pleading the 5th [View all]
For those who say this is a big nothingburger or that this email scandal is going away, think again.
From Washington Post:
A former State Department staffer who worked on Hillary Rodham Clintons private e-mail server this week tried to fend off a subpoena to testify before Congress, saying he would assert his constitutional right not to answer questions to avoid incriminating himself.
The move by Bryan Pagliano, who had worked on Clintons 2008 presidential campaign before setting up the server in her New York home in 2009, came in a Monday letter from his lawyer to the House panel investigating the 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya.
The letter cited the ongoing FBI inquiry into the security of Clintons e-mail system, and it quoted a Supreme Court ruling in which justices described the Fifth Amendment as protecting innocent men .?.?. who otherwise might be ensnared by ambiguous circumstances.?
The FBI is investigating whether Clintons system in which she exclusively used private e-mail for her work as secretary of state may have jeopardized sensitive national security information.
Thousands of e-mails that have been released by the State Department as part of a public records lawsuit show Clinton herself writing at least six e-mails containing information that has since been deemed classified. Large portions of those e-mails were redacted before their release, on the argument that their publication could harm national security.
While we understand that Mr. Paglianos response to this subpoena may be controversial in the current political environment, we hope that the members of the Select Committee will respect our clients right to invoke the protections of the Constitution, his attorney, Mark MacDougall, wrote.
Two other Senate committees also have contacted Pagliano in the past week, according to a copy of the letter, which was obtained by The Washington Post. The requests came from the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Homeland Security Committee, according to people familiar with the requests.
The Senate Judiciary Committee confirmed Wednesday that it sought to ask Pagliano about his work for Clinton.
Pagliano, who worked in the State Departments information-technology department from May 2009 until February 2013, left the agency when Clinton departed as secretary. He now works for a technology contractor that provides some services to the State Department.
This is horrible news for Hillary's campaign.
This on topic of the latest news from Reuters that additional FGI (Foreign Government Information) was found in her latest batch of emails. FGI is considered classified at birth with no exceptions. Bad news all-around for Hillary.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/09/02/us-usa-election-clinton-idUSKCN0R22C120150902
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
154 replies, 8106 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (25)
ReplyReply to this post
154 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
IT Staffer who set-up Hillary's private email server is pleading the 5th [View all]
askew
Sep 2015
OP
How does the "she may not have been the only one" defense work for most people?
merrily
Sep 2015
#73
Hell of a way to demean and dismiss the opinions of those that disagree with you...
DemocratSinceBirth
Sep 2015
#98
"in which she exclusively used private e-mail for her work as secretary of state"
AgingAmerican
Sep 2015
#5
I read it the opposite: official work was done exclusively via private email n/t
arcane1
Sep 2015
#15
In which case almost every email on the server would have been classified
AgingAmerican
Sep 2015
#19
No, the truth is I'm not desperately flailing about for dumb reasons to ignore the story
jeff47
Sep 2015
#41
LOL - great on the 'I'm not desperately flailing...' comment. That's pithy.
PatrickforO
Sep 2015
#51
You don't seem to know anything about data security with respect to the federal government.
DisgustipatedinCA
Sep 2015
#14
You use a Secure Telephone Unit (STU). It's a big phone with a key, you turn the key and you
MADem
Sep 2015
#38
A shitload of it comes right off the front pages of foreign newspapers and magazines.
MADem
Sep 2015
#46
Look how far in the weeds we are and much of it because of alleged liberals bashing Hillary
randys1
Sep 2015
#142
Do you understand what "pleading the fifth" means? If you think this is "bad news for Hillary" then
MADem
Sep 2015
#27
Who knows? He's not talking because he's worried about himself, though-not anyone else. nt
MADem
Sep 2015
#63
"One can't "plead the fifth" to protect a boss or an associate." Oh yes they can if they did...
aikoaiko
Sep 2015
#91
Show me case law where someone did something illegal and was forced to testify
aikoaiko
Sep 2015
#109
I am truly agnostic on the whole email thing. It wouldn't surprise me if they was or wasn't
aikoaiko
Sep 2015
#121
How is it "not good for Hillary" if a low level worker takes the fifth about HIS -- not her--
MADem
Sep 2015
#82
Or he is smartly aware there is a witch hunt by the GOP and others, people who claim to be Democrats
randys1
Sep 2015
#127
Well, it would explain why the server had the default encryption keys installed... (nt)
jeff47
Sep 2015
#35
"He now works for a technology contractor that provides some services to the State Department." It
Metric System
Sep 2015
#42
Rep. Elijah Cummings has it right in the article. Leave it to Sanders supporters to side with Gowdy
Metric System
Sep 2015
#40
OUCH. Truth sure hurts! But that IS the truth....and I'm guessing the candidate doesn't
MADem
Sep 2015
#47
Yep, and thus far every supposed damning revelation has fizzled out to nothing.
stevenleser
Sep 2015
#62
We are LONG past the charade that some folks here support a liberal for president.
randys1
Sep 2015
#141
I am glad you limited that to Sanders supporters and not Bernie himself. I agree that MANY
randys1
Sep 2015
#134
Amazing that on a progressive board some assume guilt if the 5th is taken. That is what a Kangaroo
still_one
Sep 2015
#55
Well, it is a progressive board, sort of. Designed to be but has MANY non liberals on it.
randys1
Sep 2015
#135
You do realize there are many people who plead the fifth when testifying before Congress, and not
still_one
Sep 2015
#52
Curious as to why she used a campaign staffer to be her personal IT guy, and THEN
TwilightGardener
Sep 2015
#64
I thought you were joking bringing up "Travelgate." I should have known better.
Metric System
Sep 2015
#126
Travelgate really was the non-Arkansas public's first introduction to Clinton's and patronage
HereSince1628
Sep 2015
#150
I was just told that being afraid you are being railroaded is not a reason you can claim
randys1
Sep 2015
#137
There is a word that often describes individuals who fail to follow an attorney's advice:
OilemFirchen
Sep 2015
#111
I meant everyone posting here does not need to avoid incriminating themselves.
merrily
Sep 2015
#113
Do you really want to plead the fifth for no earthly reason, then try to get certain kinds of jobs?
merrily
Sep 2015
#118
No no no, right here on this thread i have been ASSURED you cant exercise that right
randys1
Sep 2015
#138
Do they hate Women this much? What is the reason the HATE and BASHING of Hillary
randys1
Sep 2015
#143
So Mr. Pagliano was subpoenaed by Trey Gowdy's Benghazi Committee with no input...
DemocratSinceBirth
Sep 2015
#84
And its sad that people here, who presumably are DEMOCRATS, are jumping on the Republican....
George II
Sep 2015
#85
As a 40+ year Democrat, me too! And as of this morning her request has been denied.
George II
Sep 2015
#90
It's going to give each republican member of the committee a soapbox on which...
George II
Sep 2015
#93
Gloating and if you confront them you are silenced as they seem to outnumber the
randys1
Sep 2015
#144
Actually ... I would say this is a republican attempt to destroy the entire Democratic brand ...
1StrongBlackMan
Sep 2015
#97
Your concern is noted. But I agree that Gowdy and company have made a mess of the Benghazi hearings
Metric System
Sep 2015
#124