Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

(15,438 posts)

29. Yep.

Tue Apr 23, 2013, 09:38 PM

Apr 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

No problem. Finally, a funded mandate. nt Eleanors38 Apr 2013 #1

DU rec. Ash_F Apr 2013 #2

There they go again... ReRe Apr 2013 #3

Take this nation wide....l.; bowens43 Apr 2013 #4

Ahhh. Sanctioned confiscation of firearms based on sales records. geckosfeet Apr 2013 #5

Arbitrary and fluid over time. This is the problem. geckosfeet Apr 2013 #11

of course you're against this CreekDog Apr 2013 #17

And you're for it? krispos42 Apr 2013 #20

"Obama's waiting until after the election to go after guns!" krispos42 Apr 2013 #24

I was talking about a new federal assault-weapons ban krispos42 Apr 2013 #33

If you read the comments, Jeff Murdoch Apr 2013 #6

Yep. BlueCaliDem Apr 2013 #29

K & R for sanity... Wounded Bear Apr 2013 #7

Just doing what the NRA said to do--enforce existing law.. SunSeeker Apr 2013 #9

Yes. We all see how safe LA and San Diego are compared to Burlington Vt. geckosfeet Apr 2013 #12

Bahahhahahaha ellisonz Apr 2013 #13

The pop density of LA is 8 times higher than Burlington. baldguy Apr 2013 #16

Point. Gun laws are not the solution. geckosfeet Apr 2013 #19

I am afaid I heartilly disagree. geckosfeet Apr 2013 #23

Well, stupid is as stupid does. baldguy Apr 2013 #26

That is just patently false and demonizing. geckosfeet Apr 2013 #30