Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
3. It's interesting to me that it is a publicly-owned mine, controlled and profiting MT.
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 07:52 PM
Feb 2013

He's saying they need to sell foreign assets, which makes sense if they are going to exploit their natural resource. It doesn't say how it affects the 1,500 employees, but those jobs must be at risk, which the article suggests he is concerned about.

For me, the only problem is that I keep thinking in terms of Romney and his hostile or friendly takeovers and taking the money and running. Just because the mining outfit will be owned by a group in NYC, doesn't mean they won't sell to a foreign group (as if it matters anymore) and stiff the people of MT.

And the hedge fund isn't going to be doing this out of civic virtue, they need to show a large profit or they will be in trouble. The profit from the mine will go to someone outside of MT, not the miners, the state or any of that. I just have a bad feel about this, but am willing to educated.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Schweitzer, hedge fund ta...»Reply #3