Reply #33

In the discussion thread: Wow. Rachel Maddow Manages to Sound Like Both a Nitpicker and a Know-Nothing [View all]

Response to alcibiades_mystery (Reply #5)

Tue Jan 29, 2013, 07:30 AM

lunatica (28,953 posts)

33. You really should have put that, sans the heavy snark, in your OP

Because your original post was lacking in usable information.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

70 replies	Author	Time	Post
Wow. Rachel Maddow Manages to Sound Like Both a Nitpicker and a Know-Nothing [View all]	alcibiades_mystery	Jan 2013	OP
Would you care to explain what you're talking about?	MotherPetrie	Jan 2013	#1
There's a television show called The Rachel Maddow Show. The show plays on the MSNBC cable network	alcibiades_mystery	Jan 2013	#5
I watched the segment.	Swamp Lover	Jan 2013	#8
No, 'Cause Chevy didn't make a 327 in '55, the 327 didn't come out till '62.	alcibiades_mystery	Jan 2013	#11
I guess I'll have to ask some yutes.	Swamp Lover	Jan 2013	#13
Good one, young lady	brush	Jan 2013	#15
At first, I thought you were an expert expert on that then I remembered hearing that in a movie.	LiberalFighter	Jan 2013	#20
Thank you, Ms. Vito. You have been a lovely, lovely witness.	Arkana	Jan 2013	#46
She clearly was implying	Cosmocat	Jan 2013	#38
You could have skipped the first two paragraphs	MotherPetrie	Jan 2013	#12
Either I need to take a nap, or that was a damn funny response.	russspeakeasy	Jan 2013	#14
Oh no, it WAS damned funny (nt)	Jeff In Milwaukee	Jan 2013	#17
lmao funny	TeamPooka	Feb 2013	#70
Just saying	bbkenn92	Jan 2013	#16
9 Eastern what?	rug	Jan 2013	#18
I considered two additional paragraphs on the nature of time	alcibiades_mystery	Jan 2013	#39
A loss to all.	rug	Jan 2013	#40
Just had to put in a lol here	LostinRed	Jan 2013	#19
Being a nitpicker and know-nothing is one thing	intaglio	Jan 2013	#21
...	Cali_Democrat	Jan 2013	#24
For Someone who has been on DU for so long I'm surprised at your rude reply	dballance	Jan 2013	#26
Please simplify - i still don't get it	lame54	Jan 2013	#30
You really should have put that, sans the heavy snark, in your OP	lunatica	Jan 2013	#33
lol	jcgoldie	Jan 2013	#41
Wow, that post just showed what a jerk you can be.	Rider3	Jan 2013	#51
alcibiades_mystery, Snark Master.	bunnies	Jan 2013	#52
Wow. Condescending at all?	WeekendWarrior	Jan 2013	#68
Don't worry about it, I thought she explained herself pretty well on the subject. Go over	southernyankeebelle	Jan 2013	#28
She's quite intelligent, but she is not known for her chipper optimism	bluestateguy	Jan 2013	#2
No she's not. It drove me up the walls in '08 how many times she said Obama would lose to McCain.	Drunken Irishman	Jan 2013	#25
And how many times did we all have that exact same fear after	lunatica	Jan 2013	#34
Why is she beating up on	pscot	Jan 2013	#3
An alcibiades_mystery it is	HERVEPA	Jan 2013	#4
MSNBC is really scraping the bottom of the "Bash Obama" barrell to report something like that. nt	EastKYLiberal	Jan 2013	#6
by beating up	Enrique	Jan 2013	#7
Yes, I absolutely forbid anyone to ask questions to Dear Leader or any of His Representatives	alcibiades_mystery	Jan 2013	#10
I saw the segment. Rachael was entirely fair. OFA was stupid in putting that out.	ancianita	Jan 2013	#22
We have a "do-it-yourself democracy"	Chathamization	Jan 2013	#23
Ah, the precious political class must be cajoled into doing that for which they are paid six figures	Bluenorthwest	Jan 2013	#32
Yes, it would be nice	Chathamization	Jan 2013	#36
Not going home, but not running on the OFA Outrage Treadmill, either. I WOULD deal with	ancianita	Jan 2013	#43
Well, they listen	Chathamization	Jan 2013	#50
I'm talking about the kind of CONSTANTLY that OFA put me through. Are you? Because if you are,	ancianita	Jan 2013	#42
I so agree with your frustration ancianita!	lunatica	Jan 2013	#35
This was amazing...	vi5	Jan 2013	#37
Yeah, I wonder why it's that way now? Used to be more unified, not all these splinter groups.	Katorama	Jan 2013	#58
It's all about money at this point.	vi5	Jan 2013	#61
I absof****nglutely understand this. Not sure why they opted for this format. Seems divisive.	Katorama	Jan 2013	#56
I haven't seen it so I'm not sure...	Cha	Jan 2013	#9
His story line that OFA was 'testing' was patroniizing, excuse-making bullshit. He wasn't patient...	ancianita	Jan 2013	#44
Yeah, I get you don't like OFA.. well, I do.	Cha	Jan 2013	#48
My understanding about OFA is that they are going to fund/run local chapters, in which local members	Katorama	Jan 2013	#55
They can be skeptical	Cha	Jan 2013	#59
I also like OFA...	kjackson227	Jan 2013	#63
Here's the problem - "Respect, Empower, Include and Win" MUST include all of us, regardless of age	Katorama	Jan 2013	#57
either way,	veganlush	Jan 2013	#27
Gee we have allot of Maddow bashing today. I thought the segment on this was right.	southernyankeebelle	Jan 2013	#29
She's doubtful because she tries to ferret out signal from noise. Her past analyses have	ancianita	Jan 2013	#45
It's just my observation. :D	southernyankeebelle	Jan 2013	#47
Did you hear the "governors of Arizona" segment last night?	Kolesar	Jan 2013	#53
She always sound drunk to me. No I didn't hear her last night. But bet you its	southernyankeebelle	Jan 2013	#54
Any criticism of the president (or his operation) tends to	Doctor_J	Jan 2013	#64
Well I saw the piece she did and I thought it was well done.	southernyankeebelle	Jan 2013	#65
Pretty much everything she does is well done.	Doctor_J	Jan 2013	#66
I really like watching her because she explains topic that even a high school person	southernyankeebelle	Jan 2013	#67
reminded me of this	MrYikes	Jan 2013	#31
Well, she's right unless the aim was for congress NOT to be there when calls came in	Jersey Devil	Jan 2013	#49
wow, you couldnt be more wrong	veganlush	Jan 2013	#60
The Video Clip In Question. I guess they forgot to register their domain names, and the NRA now has	Katorama	Jan 2013	#62
What...?	Chathamization	Jan 2013	#69

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.