Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

geckosfeet

(9,644 posts)
20. Yep. Clinton signed it. But
Sat Apr 7, 2012, 03:16 PM
Apr 2012

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late-2000s_financial_crisis

In November 1999, U.S. President Bill Clinton signed into law the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act (R-R-R), which repealed part of the Glass–Steagall (D-D) Act of 1933. This repeal has been criticized for reducing the separation between commercial banks (which traditionally had fiscally conservative policies) and investment banks (which had a more risk-taking culture).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late-2000s_financial_crisis

Bolded content is mine - added to emphasize partisan nature of the two acts of congress.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm%E2%80%93Leach%E2%80%93Bliley_Act - "Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act (GLB), also known as the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999"

A year before the law was passed, Citicorp, a commercial bank holding company, merged with the insurance company Travelers Group in 1998 to form the conglomerate Citigroup, a corporation combining banking, securities and insurance services under a house of brands that included Citibank, Smith Barney, Primerica, and Travelers. Because this merger was a violation of the Glass–Steagall Act and the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, the Federal Reserve gave Citigroup a temporary waiver in September 1998. Less than a year later, GLB was passed to legalize these types of mergers on a permanent basis. The law also repealed Glass–Steagall's conflict of interest prohibitions "against simultaneous service by any officer, director, or employee of a securities firm as an officer, director, or employee of any member bank."




Yes Clinton signed it - but it was planned, hatched and executed by three R's. Clinton was a willing dupe - not sure how the impeachment mess played into this but I am sure it did.
supreme court. i had my answer before reading your post seabeyond Apr 2012 #1
has anyone seen this movie? Enrique Apr 2012 #2
I haven't, but it had something to do with Flying Squirrel Apr 2012 #6
No. It was primarily about buSh appointees and their negligence and cronyism. geckosfeet Apr 2012 #7
Well, that at least is good. Flying Squirrel Apr 2012 #8
Perhaps you should amend you previous post? It is misleading. I am sure that was not your intent geckosfeet Apr 2012 #9
I could, but Flying Squirrel Apr 2012 #10
i watched Inside Job, and it cited the repeal of Glass Steagall regulations in '99 as a factor. alp227 Apr 2012 #12
Yes, the repeal of Glass-Steagall was the vehicle davidpdx Apr 2012 #15
Yep. Clinton signed it. But geckosfeet Apr 2012 #20
Good for you. pennylane100 Apr 2012 #3
God, tell her to stop watching Hollywood movies and do some objective research into gateley Apr 2012 #4
Inside Job was a documentary not a fictional film. alp227 Apr 2012 #13
I know, but tweaked for Holllywood, I'm sure. It presented the picture it wanted gateley Apr 2012 #18
The outrage is not that there was a bailout, the outrage is that we had to bail them out... roseBudd Apr 2012 #5
Agreed alcibiades_mystery Apr 2012 #11
Except it would have been much worse grantcart Apr 2012 #19
Um, the choice is between (arguably) mildly offensive (Obama) and coalition_unwilling Apr 2012 #14
Greedy militaristic bastards vs. Batshit crazy theocratic homicidal maniacs Hawkowl Apr 2012 #21
I have seen it and it is a good documentary davidpdx Apr 2012 #16
Obama is cozier with Wall Street than I would like Cosmocat Apr 2012 #17
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»"Watch 'Inside Job,'...»Reply #20