Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
48. Hillary would still probably win, but its hard to see anyone else. It would take a strong Dem
Mon Jan 21, 2013, 12:32 PM
Jan 2013

candidate and a weak Repug candidate.

Rubio is a SEXIST JERK HockeyMom Jan 2013 #1
Not that I doubt you NewJeffCT Jan 2013 #5
Co-sponsored the Blunt Amendent HockeyMom Jan 2013 #8
And also a liar!! Janecita Jan 2013 #24
rubio is a shady character mgcgulfcoast Jan 2013 #26
It takes Hillary45 to beat a Bush nationwide, and she will with 400-450 electoral votes imho graham4anything Jan 2013 #2
Getting Crist in is important bluestateguy Jan 2013 #3
A poll today says Charlie is leading big time against Scott. graham4anything Jan 2013 #4
what an absolutely stupid poll....no one has announced they are running and Obama hasn't antigop Jan 2013 #6
Not a stupid poll Always Randy Jan 2013 #13
no...it needs to be ignored because it's a stupid poll. There is no race to poll. It's dumb. nt antigop Jan 2013 #14
but, ah, yes, the "inevitability" meme appears once again. There will be a PRIMARY in 2016 antigop Jan 2013 #7
Of course there will be a Primary, but IF Hillary runs in 2016, she will likely win TroyD Jan 2013 #9
ah, yes...there is no one else. She's the one.. the "inevitability" meme once again. Keep it up antigop Jan 2013 #10
I'll repeat...it's a ridiculous poll. It proves nothing since no one has announced they are running antigop Jan 2013 #11
No poll RudynJack Jan 2013 #27
who's worked up? I'm not--I'm simply pointing out it's a stupid poll because... antigop Jan 2013 #29
You seemed a bit overwrought. RudynJack Jan 2013 #31
no...it's the other people posting who think it's predictive...I'm trying to educate them. antigop Jan 2013 #35
and, no, I'm not "overwrought". Just pointing out it's a stupid poll...kind of like asking antigop Jan 2013 #36
You're overwrought. nt stevenleser Jan 2013 #49
nope. Just pointing out that it's a stupid poll. No one has announced they are running nt antigop Jan 2013 #52
Ya, see my #57 nt stevenleser Jan 2013 #58
No one has announced -- that's a FACT. nt antigop Jan 2013 #60
It eats you up, doesn't it? Beacool Jan 2013 #18
No, it eats you up that I point out the "inevitability" meme. Keep it up. It worked so well -2008. antigop Jan 2013 #19
If she wants it, it's hers. No one can take it away from her. I'm not making a statement on whether stevenleser Jan 2013 #42
Add +1 to the "inevitability"meme counter. nt antigop Jan 2013 #43
2008 reminder nt antigop Jan 2013 #44
In 2008, she hadnt had the most powerful job in the cabinet. Its not 2008 nt stevenleser Jan 2013 #45
It's not "hers". No one "owns" the nomination. But keep it up -- it worked so well in 2008 nt antigop Jan 2013 #46
This discussion obviously bothers you a lot to the point you cannot be objective stevenleser Jan 2013 #47
It's a FACT that no one "owns" the nomination. We have democratic processes. nt antigop Jan 2013 #53
deleted...posted in wrong place. nt antigop Jan 2013 #54
Right, you aren't upset or overwrought, and you have people skills too... stevenleser Jan 2013 #57
just pointing out FACTS. nt antigop Jan 2013 #59
No one has announced. That's a FACT. nt antigop Jan 2013 #55
some of us see through the charade. nt antigop Jan 2013 #20
The hillary that ran in 2008 DonCoquixote Jan 2013 #41
I beg to differ. Beacool Jan 2013 #50
we will see in 2016 DonCoquixote Jan 2013 #56
Dems have a lot of strong potential candidates Politicub Jan 2013 #12
and no one has announced they are running. Obama hasn't even started his second term yet. nt antigop Jan 2013 #15
Correct. RudynJack Jan 2013 #32
A lot of people are sure acting like it... davidpdx Jan 2013 #33
thank you, david nt antigop Jan 2013 #37
Good News. BlueDemKev Jan 2013 #16
No wonder Rubio has been going after Hillary over Benghazi. Beacool Jan 2013 #17
Rand Paul is a loser TroyD Jan 2013 #21
Yeah, but if these electoral votes scams go thru, no Democrat will be able to win Hawaii Hiker Jan 2013 #22
Hillary would still probably win, but its hard to see anyone else. It would take a strong Dem stevenleser Jan 2013 #48
interesting, but doesn't mean a darn thing this early Whisp Jan 2013 #23
it's a charade..and many are falling for it, sadly. nt antigop Jan 2013 #38
As Hispanic American Lobo27 Jan 2013 #25
Let's get to work! Indyfan53 Jan 2013 #28
No shit. If Hillary runs, she will win in a landslide. nt Kahuna Jan 2013 #30
Wow. That poll also had really bad news for Chris Christie. SunSeeker Jan 2013 #34
still too many people voiting repug - they must truly be idiots samsingh Jan 2013 #39
Hillary 2016! Fringe Jan 2013 #40
How 'bout we wait 3½ years and see who the Center Right Democratic leadership allows us to vote for? RC Jan 2013 #51
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»PPP: Hillary Clinton Woul...»Reply #48