Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NobodyInParticular

(102 posts)
30. Don't mean to be a stickler, but
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 04:05 PM
Jan 2013

suicide by gun is so much easier because it can be executed by the flick of a wrist, or better, by the twitch of a finger. Other forms, like slashing wrists, crashing a car off a cliff or poisoning stretch out the time frame of the process so that a lot can happen to keep the suicide from being completed. In all these alternatives the would-be suicider has potentials of indecision or factors of luck working against his plan that would be highly unlikely with a self-inflicted shot to the head or the heart.

You Change the Terms, Sir The Magistrate Jan 2013 #1
On the contrary, NobodyInParticular Jan 2013 #5
Family members vs. Theives PoliticalBiker Jan 2013 #12
But I thought guns were supposed to deter thieves? JoePhilly Jan 2013 #15
According to the NRA PoliticalBiker Jan 2013 #31
Sir, I think I would not question the legitimacy quaker bill Jan 2013 #22
Change it to people who are in the possession of a gun.. Kalidurga Jan 2013 #2
ATF says only 10-15% of guns used in all crimes are stolen. sinkingfeeling Jan 2013 #3
Then many gun owners kill themselves rightsideout Jan 2013 #4
I wonder if there is info available on how many NobodyInParticular Jan 2013 #6
That would be an interesting stat. JoePhilly Jan 2013 #16
K&R JDPriestly Jan 2013 #7
It is not the gun it is the bullet awake Jan 2013 #8
Bullets are "arms" zipplewrath Jan 2013 #9
So let's use the commerce clause and regulate their sale and purchase. JoePhilly Jan 2013 #17
We can zipplewrath Jan 2013 #19
YUP ... and I'd add "kill potential". JoePhilly Jan 2013 #20
Sawed off shot gun zipplewrath Jan 2013 #25
I like it. I think wepaons experts could develop a set of objective JoePhilly Jan 2013 #26
Wise Words from Ozzy Osbourne otohara Jan 2013 #10
People could kill people without guns DallasNina Jan 2013 #13
Okay DN otohara Jan 2013 #14
The number of dead people is the dependent variable. JoePhilly Jan 2013 #27
Based on CDC's 2010 report, Deaths: Final Data FleetwoodMac Jan 2013 #11
How many by terrorist attack? JoePhilly Jan 2013 #18
Good point. JDPriestly Jan 2013 #21
Don't you mean about 1,000 a month? lancer78 Jan 2013 #24
Don't mean to be a stickler, but NobodyInParticular Jan 2013 #30
A valid argument FleetwoodMac Jan 2013 #29
A subtle flaw Cactus Jack Jan 2013 #23
No one is allowed to research that data, so no one knows. Gun nutters and the NRA want us kestrel91316 Jan 2013 #28
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Somebody came up with thi...»Reply #30