Reply #8

In the discussion thread: PPP: Hillary Clinton Would Lead Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio In Florida 2016 [View all]

Response to HockeyMom (Reply #1)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 06:01 PM

HockeyMom (10,716 posts)

8. Co-sponsored the Blunt Amendent

but kept that under wraps and didn't seem to want to announce it to the world.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

60 replies	Author	Time	Post
PPP: Hillary Clinton Would Lead Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio In Florida 2016 [View all]	TroyD	Jan 2013	OP
Rubio is a SEXIST JERK	HockeyMom	Jan 2013	#1
Not that I doubt you	NewJeffCT	Jan 2013	#5
Co-sponsored the Blunt Amendent	HockeyMom	Jan 2013	#8
And also a liar!!	Janecita	Jan 2013	#24
rubio is a shady character	mgcgulfcoast	Jan 2013	#26
It takes Hillary45 to beat a Bush nationwide, and she will with 400-450 electoral votes imho	graham4anything	Jan 2013	#2
Getting Crist in is important	bluestateguy	Jan 2013	#3
A poll today says Charlie is leading big time against Scott.	graham4anything	Jan 2013	#4
what an absolutely stupid poll....no one has announced they are running and Obama hasn't	antigop	Jan 2013	#6
Not a stupid poll	Always Randy	Jan 2013	#13
no...it needs to be ignored because it's a stupid poll. There is no race to poll. It's dumb. nt	antigop	Jan 2013	#14
but, ah, yes, the "inevitability" meme appears once again. There will be a PRIMARY in 2016	antigop	Jan 2013	#7
Of course there will be a Primary, but IF Hillary runs in 2016, she will likely win	TroyD	Jan 2013	#9
ah, yes...there is no one else. She's the one.. the "inevitability" meme once again. Keep it up	antigop	Jan 2013	#10
I'll repeat...it's a ridiculous poll. It proves nothing since no one has announced they are running	antigop	Jan 2013	#11
No poll	RudynJack	Jan 2013	#27
who's worked up? I'm not--I'm simply pointing out it's a stupid poll because...	antigop	Jan 2013	#29
You seemed a bit overwrought.	RudynJack	Jan 2013	#31
no...it's the other people posting who think it's predictive...I'm trying to educate them.	antigop	Jan 2013	#35
and, no, I'm not "overwrought". Just pointing out it's a stupid poll...kind of like asking	antigop	Jan 2013	#36
You're overwrought. nt	stevenleser	Jan 2013	#49
nope. Just pointing out that it's a stupid poll. No one has announced they are running nt	antigop	Jan 2013	#52
Ya, see my #57 nt	stevenleser	Jan 2013	#58
No one has announced -- that's a FACT. nt	antigop	Jan 2013	#60
It eats you up, doesn't it?	Beacool	Jan 2013	#18
No, it eats you up that I point out the "inevitability" meme. Keep it up. It worked so well -2008.	antigop	Jan 2013	#19
If she wants it, it's hers. No one can take it away from her. I'm not making a statement on whether	stevenleser	Jan 2013	#42
Add +1 to the "inevitability"meme counter. nt	antigop	Jan 2013	#43
2008 reminder nt	antigop	Jan 2013	#44
In 2008, she hadnt had the most powerful job in the cabinet. Its not 2008 nt	stevenleser	Jan 2013	#45
It's not "hers". No one "owns" the nomination. But keep it up -- it worked so well in 2008 nt	antigop	Jan 2013	#46
This discussion obviously bothers you a lot to the point you cannot be objective	stevenleser	Jan 2013	#47
It's a FACT that no one "owns" the nomination. We have democratic processes. nt	antigop	Jan 2013	#53
deleted...posted in wrong place. nt	antigop	Jan 2013	#54
Right, you aren't upset or overwrought, and you have people skills too...	stevenleser	Jan 2013	#57
just pointing out FACTS. nt	antigop	Jan 2013	#59
No one has announced. That's a FACT. nt	antigop	Jan 2013	#55
some of us see through the charade. nt	antigop	Jan 2013	#20
The hillary that ran in 2008	DonCoquixote	Jan 2013	#41
I beg to differ.	Beacool	Jan 2013	#50
we will see in 2016	DonCoquixote	Jan 2013	#56
Dems have a lot of strong potential candidates	Politicub	Jan 2013	#12
and no one has announced they are running. Obama hasn't even started his second term yet. nt	antigop	Jan 2013	#15
Correct.	RudynJack	Jan 2013	#32
A lot of people are sure acting like it...	davidpdx	Jan 2013	#33
thank you, david nt	antigop	Jan 2013	#37
Good News.	BlueDemKev	Jan 2013	#16
No wonder Rubio has been going after Hillary over Benghazi.	Beacool	Jan 2013	#17
Rand Paul is a loser	TroyD	Jan 2013	#21
Yeah, but if these electoral votes scams go thru, no Democrat will be able to win	Hawaii Hiker	Jan 2013	#22
Hillary would still probably win, but its hard to see anyone else. It would take a strong Dem	stevenleser	Jan 2013	#48
interesting, but doesn't mean a darn thing this early	Whisp	Jan 2013	#23
it's a charade..and many are falling for it, sadly. nt	antigop	Jan 2013	#38
As Hispanic American	Lobo27	Jan 2013	#25
Let's get to work!	Indyfan53	Jan 2013	#28
No shit. If Hillary runs, she will win in a landslide. nt	Kahuna	Jan 2013	#30
Wow. That poll also had really bad news for Chris Christie.	SunSeeker	Jan 2013	#34
still too many people voiting repug - they must truly be idiots	samsingh	Jan 2013	#39
Hillary 2016!	Fringe	Jan 2013	#40
How 'bout we wait 3½ years and see who the Center Right Democratic leadership allows us to vote for?	RC	Jan 2013	#51

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.