Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)
2. According To The NRA And Gun Apologists That Should Be The Safest - Err Most Dangerous -
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 06:57 PM
Dec 2012

Part of the world!

An editor in Roanoke VA did this a few years ago Recursion Dec 2012 #1
So One Address In Error Is Justification For All the Carnage That Guns Have Wrought on Society cantbeserious Dec 2012 #3
What argument? Recursion Dec 2012 #7
By Default An Argument Was Made - Unintended Or Otherwise cantbeserious Dec 2012 #9
Any links or proof? MightyMopar Dec 2012 #6
LMGTFY Recursion Dec 2012 #8
but if he knows she's got a weapon, isn't that a deterrent? CTyankee Dec 2012 #16
According To The NRA And Gun Apologists That Should Be The Safest - Err Most Dangerous - cantbeserious Dec 2012 #2
It's public information RomneyLies Dec 2012 #4
Yes - Let's Use The Public Information Constructively To Provide A Public Safety Benefit For Society cantbeserious Dec 2012 #10
Yeah! What's the big deal? Public records... DonViejo Dec 2012 #12
But the gun enthusiasts say guns keep us safe, they always brag about them scaring bad guys away MightyMopar Dec 2012 #5
It is kind of funny. JDPriestly Dec 2012 #28
Your "longest paragraph" describes the drunk poacher next door Kolesar Dec 2012 #33
It occurred to me that responsible gunowners might let elderly neighbors or neighbors JDPriestly Dec 2012 #37
You would think the non-gun owners would be the ones upset LiberalFighter Dec 2012 #11
Right you are in that newblewtoo Dec 2012 #14
I don't have a gun because I really don't have much to protect other than my own person JDPriestly Dec 2012 #29
And some wonder why so many oppose mandatory registration... ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #13
Here in Wisconsin the Urinal/Sentinel published a searchable database of names and addresses.... Scuba Dec 2012 #15
I would hope it would be to inform citizens, if they, like me, wish to know who in my CTyankee Dec 2012 #17
The newspaper acted to harass the people it identified DFW Dec 2012 #18
Highly doubtful it was to protect. NutmegYankee Dec 2012 #38
Amen! SouthernDonkey Dec 2012 #39
I hope the Sentinel loses subscriptions LiberalFighter Dec 2012 #19
I found out that the family almost across the street from me owns a gun from this map. n/t jenmito Dec 2012 #20
Time to move realgreen Dec 2012 #26
"Dangerous person?" Marcia Brady Dec 2012 #34
Nope. jenmito Dec 2012 #36
I'm sure it only identified a small portion of the guns in that town. Many are bought at shows xtraxritical Dec 2012 #21
I don't think I like this idea Superbot Dec 2012 #22
Not if you don't have a gun. JDPriestly Dec 2012 #30
I don't understand what the problem is. Lugnut Dec 2012 #23
Fuck 'em. If they have guns, we have a right to know. Aristus Dec 2012 #24
I Wouldn't Want My Kid In House otohara Dec 2012 #40
Good for you. You did the right thing. Aristus Dec 2012 #41
Yep otohara Dec 2012 #42
Why is that info generally available? Kablooie Dec 2012 #25
This is fucking terrible. David__77 Dec 2012 #27
Yes. Gun registration should be just like car registration. Iggo Dec 2012 #35
I wonder if that is legal. These are not public figures still_one Dec 2012 #31
Well under FOIL the info is available there is also a state database... Historic NY Dec 2012 #32
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Newspaper Publishes Gun O...»Reply #2