Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
In Washington, strengthening SS means "paying less out". Period. No other options. djean111 Dec 2012 #1
But President Obama says compromise is more important than excellence or decency... Bluenorthwest Dec 2012 #2
Too true! pandr32 Dec 2012 #11
It just makes too much sense for the third way to wrap their complicated heads around. n/t adirondacker Dec 2012 #3
I agree with your points above but honestly confused. rhett o rick Dec 2012 #4
I normally defend Pres Obama to a fault. And I disagree vehemently with this leaked proposal. ieoeja Dec 2012 #5
Thanks, ieoija. You would think characters like Pete Peterson and Timothy Geithner are well JDPriestly Dec 2012 #16
indeed, I'm sure we aren't the only ones that have noticed stupidicus Dec 2012 #8
Chained CPI is a cut to Social Security. I trust Senator Sanders more than I trust Obama. JDPriestly Dec 2012 #14
Chained CPI is a small cut to benefits for those above a certain income level bhikkhu Dec 2012 #18
A lot of people recognize "means testing" as the first step to calling SS a welfare program instead byeya Dec 2012 #20
I agree that "we're all in this together" is better in theory bhikkhu Dec 2012 #26
People who earn above a certain income level are already required to pay part of their Social JDPriestly Dec 2012 #29
ProSense and I care about policy alcibiades_mystery Dec 2012 #22
I find it a little ironic that you accuse those that might disagree with ProSense and You rhett o rick Dec 2012 #24
Now I'm depressed... SunSeeker Dec 2012 #6
SS has no business being in the debt negotiations. blackspade Dec 2012 #7
It's a barganing chip. He could offer to give Yellowstone to the Koch Bros. rhett o rick Dec 2012 #10
Here is why they are going after Social Security and federal employee retirement funds. JDPriestly Dec 2012 #30
I knew all that and totally agree. blackspade Dec 2012 #31
Well, I agree it is a bad idea JayhawkSD Dec 2012 #9
It's primary intention is to channel MORE MONEY into the stock market JDPriestly Dec 2012 #12
Exactly! Rocky888 Dec 2012 #13
Thank you for this post me b zola Dec 2012 #15
Chained CPI, "with tweaks", becomes essentially a means-test bhikkhu Dec 2012 #17
Did you just post an OP trashing Obama? UnrepentantLiberal Dec 2012 #19
Unlike the ODSers, ProSense is criticizing what's on the table, NOT Obama! Liberal_Stalwart71 Dec 2012 #21
That is how it should be Harmony Blue Dec 2012 #23
if he put it there perhaps maybe you can explain for the readers stupidicus Dec 2012 #25
I should just allow ProSense to speak for herself, but if I know her well, and I do... Liberal_Stalwart71 Dec 2012 #27
well stupidicus Dec 2012 #28
Again, ProSense should speak fo herself. Liberal_Stalwart71 Dec 2012 #32
Criticizing policy is very different from trashing the person Grateful for Hope Dec 2012 #33
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Here's why the chained CP...»Reply #6