Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

former9thward

(31,981 posts)
4. It is not likely.
Fri Nov 23, 2012, 09:04 PM
Nov 2012

Last edited Sat Nov 24, 2012, 12:14 AM - Edit history (1)

1) If 2008 were a realigning election 2010 would not have happened. For those who shout "gerrymandering" to explain any House loss the 2010 election took place before the 2010 census data was used to realign districts.

2) Obama would have won all the states he did in 2008. He didn't. He lost 2 states and lost the one electoral vote in Nebraska that he won in 2008.

3) If the election was realigning the Rs would not have upped their governor totals. They added one and now have 30.

Here's a link to an article which, I think,... DonViejo Nov 2012 #1
Sure feels like it... Drunken Irishman Nov 2012 #2
We now hold the same electoral college advantage the GOP had in the 1980s. aaaaaa5a Nov 2012 #3
It is not likely. former9thward Nov 2012 #4
Actually satxdem Nov 2012 #5
A foolish statement. former9thward Nov 2012 #8
but satxdem Nov 2012 #12
also satxdem Nov 2012 #13
That is the history of midterms. former9thward Nov 2012 #14
no kidding... satxdem Nov 2012 #15
Not to nitpick.... rdmtimp Nov 2012 #6
Correct,my mistake. Corrected the post by edit. former9thward Nov 2012 #7
It matters more on the candidate than ideological shifts PennsylvaniaMatt Nov 2012 #9
I think it was. sofa king Nov 2012 #10
Its way too soon to tell davidn3600 Nov 2012 #11
No MFrohike Nov 2012 #16
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Was 2008 a realigning pre...»Reply #4