Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
8. The first day of the new 113th Congress will be around January 3rd
Fri Nov 16, 2012, 04:33 AM
Nov 2012

that is the day that The Senate will be able to vote on 'new senate rules' with only having to have 51 yes votes for the new rules to be adopted.

The reason The Senate is 'always in session' is because the GOPers in The House always refuse to pass the adjournment resolution - which both chambers of Congress have to pass in order for The Senate to go into an official recess. The GOPers have been doing that for a very long time so that President Obama is unable to make any recess appointments. The Senate left today for the holidays and once again The House refused to pass the joint resolution, so The Senate will be forced to have a pro-forma session every three days until everyone comes back after Thanksgiving.

But on January 3rd (or a day close to that day) The Senate will start the new 113th Congressional session and rules can be changed on that day



Yes! Make them talk. Make them own their objections in public. Indpndnt Nov 2012 #1
It has to be ASAP. Only on the first day of session can this be changed by a simple majority. Kablooie Nov 2012 #3
The Senate claims it is always in session. merrily Nov 2012 #6
The first day of the new 113th Congress will be around January 3rd Tx4obama Nov 2012 #8
Perhaps every DUer should remind their Senator, and Reid, before that date? FailureToCommunicate Nov 2012 #15
I know, but that is exactly what the debate is about. merrily Nov 2012 #45
Well, I don't really know what you're trying to say... BUT Tx4obama Nov 2012 #46
I understood your first post. I am saying not everyone agrees that a new Senate session merrily Nov 2012 #48
Grandstanding for months...sure bjobotts Nov 2012 #42
This way they can delay a majority vote but can't prevent it. Kablooie Nov 2012 #2
I would say no to that first part... Volaris Nov 2012 #13
They'll all claim to be Jimmy Stewart fighting for the rights of the little guy. Kablooie Nov 2012 #18
and that's the point. If they have to own what the rest of us think is stupid policy, Volaris Nov 2012 #29
I'll believe it when I see it. MustBeTheBooz Nov 2012 #4
What's good about this solution is the Repubs don't have any reasonable objection. NYC Liberal Nov 2012 #5
The Constitution certainly contemplates suppression of the minority. merrily Nov 2012 #7
I John2 Nov 2012 #27
I'd support that. There should be a time limit too. NYC Liberal Nov 2012 #28
It's no solution at all. Abolish the 60 vote cloture rule. merrily Nov 2012 #9
I agree that the bill should be at least debated. Nobody seems to understand the word "cloture", SleeplessinSoCal Nov 2012 #14
Agreed, there is no reason to preserve the filibuster. Period. Ray Beckerman Nov 2012 #36
Best news I've heard in a LONG time! Up2Late Nov 2012 #10
There was some really really good news about nine days ago :) Tx4obama Nov 2012 #11
Well, 9 days is a long time when you have ADD Up2Late Nov 2012 #12
Also need to abolish the practice of "holds" on nominees. yellowcanine Nov 2012 #16
Great point. great white snark Nov 2012 #19
Use the NFL Red Flag Rule HockeyTown4Ever Nov 2012 #17
Hi, HockeyTown4Ever! beac Nov 2012 #40
We will see! Milliesmom Nov 2012 #20
It's not a bill. It is a rule change vote at the being of the session which takes only 51 yes votes Tx4obama Nov 2012 #23
Thank You Milliesmom Nov 2012 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Nov 2012 #21
THAT'S WHAT I KEEP SAYING! Make them talk or trash it entirely. HopeHoops Nov 2012 #22
My pet proposal Colorado Liberal Nov 2012 #24
Like your idea. Want a real filibuster too. Have signed a petition on this. Filibuster Harry Nov 2012 #25
I've said that all along. If their principals are that strong, let them show it. TalkingDog Nov 2012 #26
end the filibuster mcgarry50 Nov 2012 #30
Right. Ray Beckerman Nov 2012 #37
Gosh! That is such a good idea... bvar22 Nov 2012 #31
Great news! Change has come Nov 2012 #32
Wow I hope this works treestar Nov 2012 #33
Suggested reform too weak. Why not simply drop the filibuster? Ray Beckerman Nov 2012 #35
Welcome to DU! hrmjustin Nov 2012 #38
They are trying to assemble the votes and need to make it palatable to 50 senators Coyotl Nov 2012 #47
What happens in the future if/when Dems want to Myrina Nov 2012 #39
Old Men Talking x2 vancouverite Nov 2012 #41
Righties love that short spit no think rhetoric toby jo Nov 2012 #43
Sounds Like a Great Strategy fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #44
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Democratic Solution To Th...»Reply #8