Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

quaker bill

(8,224 posts)
23. But they did not work to run up big margins
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 03:23 PM
Nov 2012

in CA, OR, WA, NY. Remember the huge rallies in 2008? Some of the biggest were in deep blue states that were hardly contested this time. I live in FL and what I was impressed about was the precision of this campaign. They spent nearly nothing in time and resources organizing me. There was no need, I always vote, never miss an election, and I contribute dem, but they seemed to know it and did not spend resources in my direction. The rallies in town were held not in big venues, but in the precincts where they knew they needed the voters to turn out and where turnout was often less dependable. There was no wasted motion. They went to the target audience directly and got them to the polls.

They worked to assure a win, not to run up the score in popular vote where it was not needed.

"Where were the huge rallies?", said the pundits. Huge rallies were never part of the plan, for the most part they did not rent the venues for them, plan them or set them up, because they were not needed to win.

Palin swayed some of them in 2008 melody Nov 2012 #1
Ya, in states like MO, MT, NC,& IN, some red leaning Indies were willing to vote Obama last time. RBInMaine Nov 2012 #2
I think that is an excellent observation melody Hokie Nov 2012 #3
Most were "independents" embarrased to admit they are republicans. lalalu Nov 2012 #4
TeamObama, backlash against our TeaNut 2010 guv, & same-sex marriage caused YOUNG voters to come RBInMaine Nov 2012 #5
It is a good thing to see. lalalu Nov 2012 #7
Backlash against voter suppression has been covered and will be MORESO as more reflection comes out. RBInMaine Nov 2012 #6
MSNBC is sometimes like the lone wolf. lalalu Nov 2012 #9
Agree - Independent is meaningless now sweetloukillbot Nov 2012 #10
There was alot of talk about what black voters would psychmommy Nov 2012 #12
I heard a lot of anger and people kept saying turn that anger into votes. lalalu Nov 2012 #16
Bingo! The disaffected Republican has been mentioned rarely, if at all... Surya Gayatri Nov 2012 #17
I honestly believe a person can not call them self an independent, and then vote Sukie Nov 2012 #8
Exactly lalalu Nov 2012 #11
Most Indies to have an ideological bent, but many are truly swing voters who vote split tickets. RBInMaine Nov 2012 #13
Unlike 2008 quaker bill Nov 2012 #14
Well, they DID work to NAIL DOWN their blue states. Did LOTS of work in ME, MN, MI, WI, & the rest. RBInMaine Nov 2012 #15
But they did not work to run up big margins quaker bill Nov 2012 #23
No those indies were mostly repub who were ashamed of the label and switched to Independent. Ataboy35 Nov 2012 #18
I have always believed this, but my daughter in MA says it is different there. CTyankee Nov 2012 #19
YUP. See my post above. Same in Maine. Many split ticketers and those who will sway cycle to cycle. RBInMaine Nov 2012 #20
I am glad we won popular vote overall marlakay Nov 2012 #21
Many Indys Were Former Republicans Who Were Too Ashamed To Identify With Their Former Party/nt DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2012 #22
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I read Romney won Indies ...»Reply #23