Reply #42

It could be that Anonymous threatening to watch stopped some persons from changing vote counts along the line the counts pass.

It could be that the turnout was large enough that stealing it became more risky.

It could be that the combination with other efforts just didn't do enough.
(e.g., voter roll reductions, registrations dumped, wrong-date mailers, long lines in certain areas, poll watchers, ID requirements, citizen check-boxes, wrong information about felons losing voting rights, sell-out pundits, sell-out religious leaders, sell-out religions, sell-out organizations, the old optical reader thinks the circle is lower than it is on the paper trick, ... the list goes on and on.)

But, it doesn't matter does it, which of the reasons, or any combination of the reasons. The idea that they can and would manipulate the computerized voting is not proved and not disproved.