Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Perhaps... dorkzilla Nov 2012 #1
Anonymous? KansDem Nov 2012 #4
Oh come on. LisaL Nov 2012 #8
Karl seemed to know something the rest of us didn't... KansDem Nov 2012 #16
Karl was playing a role RomneyLies Nov 2012 #25
I agree. lib123 Nov 2012 #28
Then they conned the Big Rollers..and that's why I've read Cha Nov 2012 #45
+1 nt ProudProgressiveNow Nov 2012 #44
I'll take that perhaps down to the bank and see if they will accept it. Coyotl Nov 2012 #17
Ooophs, just raising a possibility.... dorkzilla Nov 2012 #21
Ah, the conspsracy theory within a conspiracy theory to explain why the original conspiracy theory RomneyLies Nov 2012 #22
Interesting dorkzilla Nov 2012 #26
You are the mark RomneyLies Nov 2012 #27
No, i don't... dorkzilla Nov 2012 #30
And now the ad hominem attack RomneyLies Nov 2012 #33
Grow up. dorkzilla Nov 2012 #37
And yet another ad hominem RomneyLies Nov 2012 #38
Sorry but that conclusion doesn't necessarily follow from the results. PoliticAverse Nov 2012 #2
This! They didn't cheat enough this election so expect them to cheat more in the future. jenw2 Nov 2012 #39
false dichotomy. n/t yodermon Nov 2012 #3
the court challenge Firebirds01 Nov 2012 #5
They put all their eggs in the suppression basket Floyd_Gondolli Nov 2012 #6
Bullshit title and bullshit comments. Festivito Nov 2012 #7
Do you think Anonymous un-stole the elections? Welcome_hubby Nov 2012 #9
Stealing Ohio would not have been enough. Qutzupalotl Nov 2012 #32
+1! excellent point. they saw it was too hard for them to stop the Obama 270 march, and risking Divine Discontent Nov 2012 #48
Both your own examples go against your own discretization theory. Festivito Nov 2012 #42
Make voting machines counting verifiable and have a clear paper trail UCmeNdc Nov 2012 #10
That type of logic wouldn't pass through a basic IQ test. progressivebydesign Nov 2012 #11
Has the Justice Department uncovered any voting machine fraud? Welcome_hubby Nov 2012 #12
If the machines were hackable, Romney would be president-elect RomneyLies Nov 2012 #35
It must be nice to be so certain of something GCP Nov 2012 #47
Not according to Free Republic hack89 Nov 2012 #13
Not necessarily democrattotheend Nov 2012 #14
There was one machine taken out of service for flipping votes. truthisfreedom Nov 2012 #15
Thank you for your concern. aquart Nov 2012 #18
Actually, it's lack of concern Welcome_hubby Nov 2012 #20
The vote hacking hucksters thank you for your contribution. RomneyLies Nov 2012 #36
Either this false premise or that false premise is false logic Coyotl Nov 2012 #19
Just because he won OH reflection Nov 2012 #23
Zzzz... bleever Nov 2012 #24
The marks of the grifters will never admit they've been conned RomneyLies Nov 2012 #29
Trashing this thread as unsubstantiated opinion, not fact....3....2....1....POOF!! nt. OldDem2012 Nov 2012 #31
Well that's a bit naive and lacking in logic. nt Live and Learn Nov 2012 #34
I Disagree Liberal1975 Nov 2012 #40
Exactly, Liberal1975.. Cha Nov 2012 #46
Exactly! As verified voting advocate David Dill once said-- eridani Nov 2012 #49
It seems to me that if the machines can be hacked, they will. LiberalAndProud Nov 2012 #41
Maybe the fraudsters are closet Democrats. Kablooie Nov 2012 #43
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Voting machine conspiracy...»Reply #21