Reply #11

In the discussion thread: Voting machine conspiracy theories have been officially discredited [View all]

Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Sat Nov 10, 2012, 04:09 PM

11. That type of logic wouldn't pass through a basic IQ test.

The fact that the President won Ohio, does not mean that the machines were NOT rigged. You have to remember that they steal elections through thousands of little efforts. One bad machine in one precinct, voter purge in Florida, robo calls with the wrong date, billboards threatening minority voters with prison.

Just because he won, doesn't mean that there wasn't machine fraud. It could also mean that he won by so much, AND because the Dems run the Justice Dept and govt, we were able to oversee things and be on top of everything. How many provisional ballots had to be given out in Ohio?? That was also part of it...

That assumption would fail the "If all smaugs are thors, and all thors are thrains" question on an IQ test. It proves nothign.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

49 replies	Author	Time	Post
Voting machine conspiracy theories have been officially discredited [View all]	Welcome_hubby	Nov 2012	OP
Perhaps...	dorkzilla	Nov 2012	#1
Anonymous?	KansDem	Nov 2012	#4
Oh come on.	LisaL	Nov 2012	#8
Karl seemed to know something the rest of us didn't...	KansDem	Nov 2012	#16
Karl was playing a role	RomneyLies	Nov 2012	#25
I agree.	lib123	Nov 2012	#28
Then they conned the Big Rollers..and that's why I've read	Cha	Nov 2012	#45
+1 nt	ProudProgressiveNow	Nov 2012	#44
I'll take that perhaps down to the bank and see if they will accept it.	Coyotl	Nov 2012	#17
Ooophs, just raising a possibility....	dorkzilla	Nov 2012	#21
Ah, the conspsracy theory within a conspiracy theory to explain why the original conspiracy theory	RomneyLies	Nov 2012	#22
Interesting	dorkzilla	Nov 2012	#26
You are the mark	RomneyLies	Nov 2012	#27
No, i don't...	dorkzilla	Nov 2012	#30
And now the ad hominem attack	RomneyLies	Nov 2012	#33
Grow up.	dorkzilla	Nov 2012	#37
And yet another ad hominem	RomneyLies	Nov 2012	#38
Sorry but that conclusion doesn't necessarily follow from the results.	PoliticAverse	Nov 2012	#2
This! They didn't cheat enough this election so expect them to cheat more in the future.	jenw2	Nov 2012	#39
false dichotomy. n/t	yodermon	Nov 2012	#3
the court challenge	Firebirds01	Nov 2012	#5
They put all their eggs in the suppression basket	Floyd_Gondolli	Nov 2012	#6
Bullshit title and bullshit comments.	Festivito	Nov 2012	#7
Do you think Anonymous un-stole the elections?	Welcome_hubby	Nov 2012	#9
Stealing Ohio would not have been enough.	Qutzupalotl	Nov 2012	#32
+1! excellent point. they saw it was too hard for them to stop the Obama 270 march, and risking	Divine Discontent	Nov 2012	#48
Both your own examples go against your own discretization theory.	Festivito	Nov 2012	#42
Make voting machines counting verifiable and have a clear paper trail	UCmeNdc	Nov 2012	#10
That type of logic wouldn't pass through a basic IQ test.	progressivebydesign	Nov 2012	#11
Has the Justice Department uncovered any voting machine fraud?	Welcome_hubby	Nov 2012	#12
If the machines were hackable, Romney would be president-elect	RomneyLies	Nov 2012	#35
It must be nice to be so certain of something	GCP	Nov 2012	#47
Not according to Free Republic	hack89	Nov 2012	#13
Not necessarily	democrattotheend	Nov 2012	#14
There was one machine taken out of service for flipping votes.	truthisfreedom	Nov 2012	#15
Thank you for your concern.	aquart	Nov 2012	#18
Actually, it's lack of concern	Welcome_hubby	Nov 2012	#20
The vote hacking hucksters thank you for your contribution.	RomneyLies	Nov 2012	#36
Either this false premise or that false premise is false logic	Coyotl	Nov 2012	#19
Just because he won OH	reflection	Nov 2012	#23
Zzzz...	bleever	Nov 2012	#24
The marks of the grifters will never admit they've been conned	RomneyLies	Nov 2012	#29
Trashing this thread as unsubstantiated opinion, not fact....3....2....1....POOF!! nt.	OldDem2012	Nov 2012	#31
Well that's a bit naive and lacking in logic. nt	Live and Learn	Nov 2012	#34
I Disagree	Liberal1975	Nov 2012	#40
Exactly, Liberal1975..	Cha	Nov 2012	#46
Exactly! As verified voting advocate David Dill once said--	eridani	Nov 2012	#49
It seems to me that if the machines can be hacked, they will.	LiberalAndProud	Nov 2012	#41
Maybe the fraudsters are closet Democrats.	Kablooie	Nov 2012	#43

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.