2016 Postmortem

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)

92. As FDR said of the banksters,

Reply to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #91)

Wed May 25, 2016, 03:21 PM

May 2016

"I welcome their hatred".

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

94 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

ABC: Clinton Email Probe in Late Stage, FBI May Question Her [View all] IdaBriggs May 2016 OP

So if the FBI investigates me, I can tell them I'm "very busy right now"? lagomorph777 May 2016 #1

Caught that did you? pmorlan1 May 2016 #3

Depends Matt_in_STL May 2016 #4

Isn't this really what this election is all about? danimich1 May 2016 #5

And you wonder how all the people WITHOUT the money and who WOULD be prosecuted pdsimdars May 2016 #14

That is it in a nutshell. pangaia May 2016 #38

They just don't get it. danimich1 May 2016 #61

If there is nothing there Demsrule86 May 2016 #8

No, it is NOT his "only path." California voter here, so stuff it, m-kay? Peace Patriot May 2016 #52

It won't end there CorkySt.Clair May 2016 #88

Yes creeksneakers2 May 2016 #37

That was my question also. n/t Bjornsdotter May 2016 #59

That seemed odd to me too. Kall May 2016 #63

Don't get your hopes up over this little tidbit of news. hrmjustin May 2016 #2

She's not brushing this one off. Note the "interview Clinton soon, if they haven't already" leveymg May 2016 #36

You get yourself too excited over this issue. hrmjustin May 2016 #39

If you had been reading the papers, you'd know that scenario is not only plausible but probable. leveymg May 2016 #41

What are you going to do when she is not indicted? hrmjustin May 2016 #43

I have said all along that the FBI will find she violated her security clearance. She'll be pardoned leveymg May 2016 #50

And if she is not found to have violated the law by the fbi? hrmjustin May 2016 #66

that is not legitimately possible grasswire May 2016 #73

I think you watch fox too much. hrmjustin May 2016 #74

I think YOU ignore way too much. nt grasswire May 2016 #75

I don't pay too much attention to rw media or rw fantasy. hrmjustin May 2016 #76

Apparently neither do facts. libdem4life May 2016 #87

I most definitely want her 840high May 2016 #77

There's never a great time during primary season for something like this Babel_17 May 2016 #6

June 7. JackRiddler May 2016 #32

Thanks! I'll edit my post to relect that Babel_17 May 2016 #42

Kick Matt_in_STL May 2016 #7

Good I'll be glad when this is over and we can just focus on the election Dem2 May 2016 #9

Don't they interview the target of an investigation last? Skwmom May 2016 #10

Yup. . and funnily enough, they've interviewed everyone else already . . . . Hmmmm. . . . pdsimdars May 2016 #15

Any day now we will probably hear they are interviewing Bernie after Clinton. Skwmom May 2016 #16

there will be a mighty spin, that much is assured reddread May 2016 #18

Yes. And they only ask questions they already know the answers to so... IdaBriggs May 2016 #21

But have they confirmed she's a target? scscholar May 2016 #44

Who would you guess the target to be? frylock May 2016 #81

It's the unsecure server Bob41213 May 2016 #84

It couldn't be the person whose basement housed the server, right? lagomorph777 May 2016 #94

Kick truebluegreen May 2016 #11

K&R LiberalArkie May 2016 #12

If ABC news has gotten around to admitting that the FBI wants to winter is coming May 2016 #13

where has she been campaigning the last few days? reddread May 2016 #19

also the Chicago Tribune antigop May 2016 #35

Same AP article. JudyM May 2016 #40

K & R! TIME TO PANIC May 2016 #17

i have a feeling certain people will not be happy unless she is convicted. n/t. okieinpain May 2016 #20

I've got a feeling DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #24

+1 n/t. okieinpain May 2016 #62

If she's guilty, then conviction. However, she is both "old" and a former First Lady, IdaBriggs May 2016 #26

See post #23 DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #34

Ie would sadden me if she were convicted of anything. But were she to be forced out or Autumn May 2016 #67

lol. n/t. okieinpain May 2016 #89

Delicious. frylock May 2016 #22

With all your snips you snipped out this. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #23

I wonder why that was left out? KingFlorez May 2016 #25

Fidelity to the truth is just so much bourgeois claptrap. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #28

Undoubtedly just an innocent oversight. COLGATE4 May 2016 #48

Gee, that makes two CIA Directors and a National Security Advisor spies or leakers, doesn't it? leveymg May 2016 #45

I am willing to make a wager. HRC will not be indicted. If I lose I leave DU forever. If you lose... DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #46

Of course she will not be indicted. Indictment may be recommended though... Barack_America May 2016 #47

A finding that she violated her security clearance is enough to disqualify her in the eyes of voters leveymg May 2016 #49

What happens if the FBI doesn't issue such a finding? emulatorloo May 2016 #54

That's already public knowledge. She won't be exonerated. leveymg May 2016 #60

The 'public knowlege' is nothing but speculation. The FBI is not leaking. emulatorloo May 2016 #64

The govt has already found large amounts of classified materials leveymg May 2016 #68

We'll know what the FBI has to say soon enough. emulatorloo May 2016 #69

Because it shatters the 'She will be indicted' fantasy emulatorloo May 2016 #53

The seminal poster certainly tried to leave the impression she will be. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #56

Then why didn't they treat Petreaus the same way? trudyco May 2016 #70

Keep up... DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #71

Hillary deliberately received and discussed... tex-wyo-dem May 2016 #83

I am sure you know more about the relevant law than the woman who actually prosecuted Petraeus. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #85

He gave classified files to his rusty fender May 2016 #72

What about Sidney Blumenthal? k8conant May 2016 #78

Well, the ongoing investigation should rusty fender May 2016 #79

"Legal experts have said" = her surrogates. Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #90

Have a day. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #91

As FDR said of the banksters, Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #92

I am glad I was able to please you. He didn't mean it to be taken literally. I did. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #93

Thanks goes into the time line nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #27

drumroll intro... Jack Bone May 2016 #29

""Wish in one hand, crap in the other. See which one gets filled first." DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #33

Ask Martha....lying to investigators ain't no joke! nt Jack Bone May 2016 #57

Maybe you will take the wager your compadre won't. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #58

This message was self-deleted by its author Actor May 2016 #30

Don't forget to read the paragraph after your highlight. Nt NCTraveler May 2016 #31

*clap*clap*clap*clap*clap*clap*clap*clap*clap*clap*clap*clap*clap*clap* Tarc May 2016 #51

I find the Clinton Foundation far more horrifying. senz May 2016 #55

Dear FBI, just get it over with! democrattotheend May 2016 #65

For democrats... Pastiche423 May 2016 #82

Wish they'd shit or get off the pot. n/t Jester Messiah May 2016 #80

Kickety kick kick. Scuba May 2016 #86