Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
Fri May 6, 2016, 12:49 AM May 2016

243 previously unseen HRC emails released today. [View all]

The documents were obtained by Judicial Watch in response a court order in a May 5,2015, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed against the State Department, after it failed to respond to a March 18 FOIA request (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00684)). The lawsuit seeks:

Emails of official State Department business received or sent by former Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin from January 1, 2009 through February 1, 2013 using a non-“state.gov” email address.

Many of the documents predate March 18, 2009, go back as far as January, and were not turned over by Clinton to the State Department from her non-government server. The emails cover topics such as: her schedule and travel plans; criticisms of Clinton by Richard Gere; Afghanistan; U.S. financial aid and security concerns for several Pacific Islands; the recommendation for a health care system overhaul; and food security.

Other previously unreleased emails are dated March 18, 2009, despite suggestions by Clinton that she had turned over emails with that date. These emails refer to, among other things, her “friends at Planned Parenthood” and a call to Bill Clinton’s former National Security Adviser, the late Sandy Berger, who was convicted of illegally removing classified documents from the National Archives.

On October 16, 2011, Clinton sent a “confidential” backgrounder from former Ambassador to Malta Doug Kmiec (sent from his apparently unsecure server) to aides Abedin and Cheryl Mills. The email has since been redacted due to its classified nature. Specifically, Kmiec discusses sensitive persons and organizations working in the U.S. Embassy in Malta – the U.S. Maritime training program with the “AFM” (Armed Forces of Malta).

The Abedin emails include an exchange with Clinton’s former Deputy Chief of Staff Jacob Sullivan, in which Abedin suggests Clinton would often complain of being “exhausted”:

From: Abedin, Huma
To: Sullivan, Jacob J.
Sent: Thursday, April 16 18:54:22 2009
Subject:

I have to go to the dinner with her [state dinner in Santa Domingo, Dominican Republic]
I just got the I’m exhausted thing from her and Eugene [likely Eugene Bae, Clinton’s advance official] isn’t going to be able to tell Oscar de la Renta to shut up.


A March 31, 2011, email from State Department official Michael Hammer to Abedin and others shows yet another non-State.gov email address of HumaMAbedin[Redacted], which differs from the known [email protected] and [email protected].

“These emails further undermine Hillary Clinton’s statement, under penalty of perjury, suggesting she turned over all of her government emails to the State Department,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “How many more Hillary Clinton emails is the Obama State Department hiding?”

Hillary Clinton has repeatedly stated that the 55,000 pages of documents she turned over to the State Department in December 2014 included all of her work-related emails. In response to a court order in other Judicial Watch litigation, she declared under penalty of perjury that she had “directed that all my emails on clintonemail.com in my custody that were or are potentially federal records be provided to the Department of State, and on information and belief, this has been done.” This new email find is also at odds with her official campaign statement:

On December 5, 2014, 30,490 copies of work or potentially work-related emails sent and received by Clinton from March 18, 2009, to February 1, 2013, were provided to the State Department. This totaled roughly 55,000 pages. More than 90% of her work or potentially work-related emails provided to the Department were already in the State Department’s record-keeping system because those e-mails were sent to or received by “state.gov” accounts.

Early in her term, Clinton continued using an att.blackberry.net account that she had used during her Senate service. Given her practice from the beginning of emailing State Department officials on their state.gov accounts, her work-related emails during these initial weeks would have been captured and preserved in the State Department’s record-keeping system. She, however, no longer had access to these emails once she transitioned from this account.

The Associated Press previously reported that the State Department received from the Department of Defense emails between Clinton and General David Petraeus that also predate March 2009. Those emails have not been released to the public.

.............................

68 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Interesting Gucciger, Manning, Panama Papers docs on this web page: CentralCoaster May 2016 #1
Guccifer Hacking Charges, pleading, court documents, etc. Samantha May 2016 #7
the mass of info dumping is quite mind boggling right now. grasswire May 2016 #13
I jumped on my rowing machine for 20 minutes Aerows May 2016 #17
*kicked alot more pebbles* desmiller May 2016 #29
I am thinking that no one is really surprised by this Samantha May 2016 #2
Oh, see also this page: CentralCoaster May 2016 #3
Thanks. 840high May 2016 #8
That word perjury comes up again. HooptieWagon May 2016 #4
Are you going to read every one of them? nolawarlock May 2016 #5
I hope there's some good recipes ProudToBeBlueInRhody May 2016 #14
:-D nolawarlock May 2016 #15
I have a recipe. Aerows May 2016 #18
her sworn declaration grasswire May 2016 #6
Nothing to see there. You don't speak Clinton... Bob41213 May 2016 #40
gotta parse every word with them.. nt grasswire May 2016 #42
You say that like it's a bad thing scscholar May 2016 #51
Yeah, I mean who wants to believe anything the President says... Bob41213 May 2016 #53
OMG, I saw that IMMEDIATELY and thought, yup, Clintonese. FlatBaroque May 2016 #47
. haikugal May 2016 #9
thank you grasswire May 2016 #11
How convienient. They've taken the mask off haven't they?! haikugal May 2016 #58
well she was clearly lying under penalty of perjury; this is not the first time, I believe amborin May 2016 #10
yeah grasswire May 2016 #12
We no longer have the rule of law in this country, she is immune from perjury laws... Dragonfli May 2016 #16
"Clearly lying"? I'd be surprised ... JustABozoOnThisBus May 2016 #21
agree, though occasionally it's totally blatant amborin May 2016 #23
Republicans agree that Clinton lies a lot uponit7771 May 2016 #26
So do a lot of Democrats and Independents. Fuddnik May 2016 #33
Mostly hate filled racist Donald Trump supporter types uponit7771 May 2016 #35
So do her records and videos and positions and hidden secrets now emerging. libdem4life May 2016 #37
No, it sure isn't. I think it's reflexive with her cali May 2016 #28
More info paulthompson May 2016 #19
One more thing paulthompson May 2016 #20
They are different, just like Microsoft's Hotmail & Outlook accounts differ using same portal. TheBlackAdder May 2016 #22
Question.. KoKo May 2016 #24
This gets back to the problem of how Hillary determined what was work related in the first place. thesquanderer May 2016 #36
You know why she did it that way don't you? Bob41213 May 2016 #59
thank you for pointing out that I use the words "HRC emails" generically... grasswire May 2016 #63
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe May 2016 #25
False and misleading OP, more wingerish tripe posted on DU uponit7771 May 2016 #27
+ 1 JoePhilly May 2016 #31
More dead end pursuits. No wonder she won't release her transcripts. oasis May 2016 #30
kick kgnu_fan May 2016 #32
Judicial Watch -- this is your idea of a credible source? procon May 2016 #34
Doesn't matter. The MSM won't cover Bernie or HRCs scandals. libdem4life May 2016 #38
JW is supervised in this legal matter by federal Judge Emmet Sullivan -- grasswire May 2016 #39
What is this allegation, "HRC who has angered the judge"? procon May 2016 #43
you apparently haven't seen everything Sullivan has said about the case. nt grasswire May 2016 #62
Two Federal Judges have allowed Discovery to go foward in the FOIA KoKo May 2016 #45
Judicial Watch Demsrule86 May 2016 #50
Why so much focus on, "One judge was appointed by Bill Clinton"? procon May 2016 #54
Because everything from Judical Watch is considered "CT." n/t KoKo May 2016 #56
Why should we trust David Brock's Media Matters anymore? 2cannan May 2016 #66
Is that supposed to serve as a counter to Judicial Watch? procon May 2016 #67
immaterial. nt grasswire May 2016 #68
Sigh. FBI needs to pull the trigger soon. IdaBriggs May 2016 #41
Just tell Oscar de la Renta to shut up Eugene! lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #44
That WAS pretty bizarre.... KoKo May 2016 #46
This is 80% of what people dislike about Clinton in 20 words or less. n/t lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #48
and poor Huma couldn't get out of having dinner with her. SMH nt grasswire May 2016 #61
I must be obtuse but who is Eugene?? nt 2cannan May 2016 #64
Such a good thing she had a private server Demsrule86 May 2016 #49
K & R AzDar May 2016 #52
K&R nenagh May 2016 #55
to be fair, rage against Oscar de la Renta is something we can all agree with MisterP May 2016 #57
yes, that grasswire May 2016 #60
Scandalous. complain jane May 2016 #65
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»243 previously unseen HRC...»Reply #0