Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)DNC was correct in their response, Sanders drops lawsuit. [View all]
Audit confirms four individual accounts within the Sanders campaign accessed information on the Clinton campaign only. The Sanders campaign performed twenty five searches, targeting eleven states, and downloaded data; all directed at the Clinton campaign.
Clinton and O'Malley cleared as expected.
Sanders suit had no merit and had to be withdrawn.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
95 replies, 3279 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (38)
ReplyReply to this post
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How about these howling morons screaming that the investigation somehow VINDICATED Sanders??
Number23
Apr 2016
#84
That's exactly right. If they'd been "exonerated" then the lawsuit would have continued on
Number23
Apr 2016
#93
It's really funny. Last night there were number of threads where they claimed report exonerated
Hoyt
Apr 2016
#76
It was nothing short of astonishing. The report says clearly that the campaign engaged in wrong doin
Number23
Apr 2016
#85
It's possible, but unlikely. I got signed up for numerous mailing lists almost at the same time.
moriah
Apr 2016
#13
Describing an article he wrote for The American Spectator, a conservative magazine, in 1992,
Loudestlib
Apr 2016
#12
Really? Wow. That alone should be a huge black eye on Sanders. I do not know who this man is
seabeyond
Apr 2016
#20
The alerter MAY have understood it was Brock's comment, but took a shot at fooling a jury anyway.
merrily
Apr 2016
#57
This was the turning point for me. I lost a lot of respect for Sanders and he never got it back.
yardwork
Apr 2016
#14
The DNC froze the Sanders access to their own data. The lawsuit was to get access
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#26
The lawsuit was to get access to their own data and they got that so they dropped
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#30
They got it a couple days later. Dropped the law suit 4 or more months later. Your theory fails.
seabeyond
Apr 2016
#31
LINK? If the lawsuit was to get access and he got access, saying the lawsuit had no merit is wrong.
merrily
Apr 2016
#50
If the law suit was about access, then he would have dropped it the next day, not over 4 months.
seabeyond
Apr 2016
#60
Sorry, you are mistaken (Imagine that!). The investigation Sanders requested just wrapped up.
merrily
Apr 2016
#62
No stealing, no spin AT ALL from me! The post to which I linked you contains links to
merrily
Apr 2016
#70
I think DNC and Clinton especially behaved the very opposite of what you described. Clinton
seabeyond
Apr 2016
#21
Sanders made one big mistake: saying "the American people are sick and tired of hearing
Betty Karlson
Apr 2016
#23
So, deflect his theft with rw smear? No surprise you feel that. The funny though? Sanders was trying
seabeyond
Apr 2016
#24
His people admit he was trying to throw a jab and was really bothered that Clinton twisted
seabeyond
Apr 2016
#39
Which of his people claimed that? All the media agreed he threw her a bone!
Betty Karlson
May 2016
#94
Way back in New Hampshire a Democratic official, super delegate threw out there, Sanders might stop
seabeyond
Apr 2016
#40
Your information is from what the DNC is saying about the investigation. They have not
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#25
The suit was to regain access to their own data which the DNC has now allowed so the
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#29
I will continue to fight the control of our government by the billionaires and Wall Street that
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#42
What's sad is that you have sided with the Rich And Powerful and disparage
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#56
That's what most Americans feel about Clinton. She did betray her party and
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#64
The suit was dropped when the DNC unfroze the Sanders campaign access to their own data.
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#67
"The suit was dropped when the DNC unfroze" Not even close to truth, any truth. How do you do that?
seabeyond
Apr 2016
#69
Divert! Divert!!!! How do you say Sanders dropped the suit when he got access?
seabeyond
Apr 2016
#73
Koch Bros., Karl Rove and Preibus are funding anti-Hillary propaganda and taking steps
JTFrog
Apr 2016
#35
Koch Bros have endorsed Clinton. She agrees with the Repubs on 90% of the issues.
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#38
The Koch Bros recognize that a Clinton presidency will be a boon for the Wealth and Powerful.
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#43
the billionaires love Clinton, the neocons love Clinton, Prisons For Profits love Clinton.
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#47