Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 07:25 AM Apr 2016

DNC was correct in their response, Sanders drops lawsuit. [View all]

Audit confirms four individual accounts within the Sanders campaign accessed information on the Clinton campaign only. The Sanders campaign performed twenty five searches, targeting eleven states, and downloaded data; all directed at the Clinton campaign.

Clinton and O'Malley cleared as expected.

Sanders suit had no merit and had to be withdrawn.

95 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
KNR. I'm shocked, I tell ya!!! Lucinda Apr 2016 #1
Wish the continued lying through their teeth Hortensis Apr 2016 #51
You're just nasty greiner3 Apr 2016 #83
And Sanders is run-of-the-mill honest/dishonest for Hortensis Apr 2016 #92
How about these howling morons screaming that the investigation somehow VINDICATED Sanders?? Number23 Apr 2016 #84
I don't know...but it definitely seems to knock reality out cold! Lucinda Apr 2016 #86
Why drop the $75k lawsuit if they won? puffy socks Apr 2016 #88
That's exactly right. If they'd been "exonerated" then the lawsuit would have continued on Number23 Apr 2016 #93
The integrity... JSup Apr 2016 #2
Yet, Sanders' campaign has spun the report to say they did no wrong and Hoyt Apr 2016 #3
Clearly, they're LYING to cover their ass and ... NurseJackie Apr 2016 #4
It's really funny. Last night there were number of threads where they claimed report exonerated Hoyt Apr 2016 #76
They're like: "Except for the data we stole, NO DATA WAS STOLEN!" And ... NurseJackie Apr 2016 #77
It was nothing short of astonishing. The report says clearly that the campaign engaged in wrong doin Number23 Apr 2016 #85
Exactly. Hoyt Apr 2016 #87
They timed their withdrawal for a Friday evening news dump... NCTraveler Apr 2016 #5
OK, I'm not making any accusations, just asking a question. Arkansas Granny Apr 2016 #6
Probably not Renew Deal Apr 2016 #10
It's possible, but unlikely. I got signed up for numerous mailing lists almost at the same time. moriah Apr 2016 #13
Just being on the voting rolls gets you on all kinds of mailing lists. yardwork Apr 2016 #16
Voter rolls are public information, if I recall correctly ... NurseJackie Apr 2016 #22
. Loudestlib Apr 2016 #7
Weaver is one of the most unethical players this campaign season. NCTraveler Apr 2016 #9
Describing an article he wrote for The American Spectator, a conservative magazine, in 1992, Loudestlib Apr 2016 #12
Really? Wow. That alone should be a huge black eye on Sanders. I do not know who this man is seabeyond Apr 2016 #20
The man... tonedevil Apr 2016 #46
Jury voted to leave. merrily Apr 2016 #49
Thanks... tonedevil Apr 2016 #52
The alerter MAY have understood it was Brock's comment, but took a shot at fooling a jury anyway. merrily Apr 2016 #57
That's from Weaver. It is not the official finding. Renew Deal Apr 2016 #11
Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #8
This was the turning point for me. I lost a lot of respect for Sanders and he never got it back. yardwork Apr 2016 #14
DNC massively overreacted, confirms independent investigation: Betty Karlson Apr 2016 #15
That sugar coated explanation is a press release sufrommich Apr 2016 #17
That is a campaign release. NCTraveler Apr 2016 #19
The DNC froze the Sanders access to their own data. The lawsuit was to get access rhett o rick Apr 2016 #26
It did just the opposite. NCTraveler Apr 2016 #28
The lawsuit was to get access to their own data and they got that so they dropped rhett o rick Apr 2016 #30
They got it a couple days later. Dropped the law suit 4 or more months later. Your theory fails. seabeyond Apr 2016 #31
bullshit- they got access ages ago. try another theory! bettyellen Apr 2016 #81
LINK? If the lawsuit was to get access and he got access, saying the lawsuit had no merit is wrong. merrily Apr 2016 #50
If the law suit was about access, then he would have dropped it the next day, not over 4 months. seabeyond Apr 2016 #60
Sorry, you are mistaken (Imagine that!). The investigation Sanders requested just wrapped up. merrily Apr 2016 #62
Sanders people stole, then sued and now spins. seabeyond Apr 2016 #65
No stealing, no spin AT ALL from me! The post to which I linked you contains links to merrily Apr 2016 #70
Stealin' seabeyond Apr 2016 #72
Nope. The DNC investigation found otherwise. merrily Apr 2016 #74
He stole. We knew it then with a pathetic law suit, we know it now. Cheated. seabeyond Apr 2016 #75
Not true. puffy socks Apr 2016 #91
I think DNC and Clinton especially behaved the very opposite of what you described. Clinton seabeyond Apr 2016 #21
Sanders made one big mistake: saying "the American people are sick and tired of hearing Betty Karlson Apr 2016 #23
So, deflect his theft with rw smear? No surprise you feel that. The funny though? Sanders was trying seabeyond Apr 2016 #24
So Sanders gracious and gentlemanly behaviour now counts as "snark"? Betty Karlson Apr 2016 #36
His people admit he was trying to throw a jab and was really bothered that Clinton twisted seabeyond Apr 2016 #39
Which of his people claimed that? All the media agreed he threw her a bone! Betty Karlson May 2016 #94
For fuck's sake. JTFrog Apr 2016 #34
Way back in New Hampshire a Democratic official, super delegate threw out there, Sanders might stop seabeyond Apr 2016 #40
Criticing and insulkting are two different things. Betty Karlson May 2016 #95
so Sanders' is the ONLY campaign found to be cheating in this primary bigtree Apr 2016 #18
Your information is from what the DNC is saying about the investigation. They have not rhett o rick Apr 2016 #25
You believe this to be inaccurate information? NCTraveler Apr 2016 #27
The suit was to regain access to their own data which the DNC has now allowed so the rhett o rick Apr 2016 #29
And Sanders will do anything to get the WH, like steal? seabeyond Apr 2016 #32
I understand why you fell you have to do this. NCTraveler Apr 2016 #33
I will continue to fight the control of our government by the billionaires and Wall Street that rhett o rick Apr 2016 #42
You are promoting known campaign theft. NCTraveler Apr 2016 #54
What's sad is that you have sided with the Rich And Powerful and disparage rhett o rick Apr 2016 #56
Twenty-five searches, four users, eleven states. NCTraveler Apr 2016 #59
No ethics. No integrity. Nt seabeyond Apr 2016 #61
+1 NCTraveler Apr 2016 #63
That's what most Americans feel about Clinton. She did betray her party and rhett o rick Apr 2016 #64
Sanders backed it also in all ways but one vote. seabeyond Apr 2016 #66
The suit was dropped when the DNC unfroze the Sanders campaign access to their own data. rhett o rick Apr 2016 #67
What? The DNC allowed them access the day after the breach. sufrommich Apr 2016 #68
"The suit was dropped when the DNC unfroze" Not even close to truth, any truth. How do you do that? seabeyond Apr 2016 #69
How do you rationalize siding with the Bankster wing of our party. rhett o rick Apr 2016 #71
Divert! Divert!!!! How do you say Sanders dropped the suit when he got access? seabeyond Apr 2016 #73
No one is going to believe what you are selling. NCTraveler Apr 2016 #78
Koch Bros., Karl Rove and Preibus are funding anti-Hillary propaganda and taking steps JTFrog Apr 2016 #35
Koch Bros have endorsed Clinton. She agrees with the Repubs on 90% of the issues. rhett o rick Apr 2016 #38
your post is 90% bullshit. I am see lots of just pulling whatever number. seabeyond Apr 2016 #41
The Koch Bros recognize that a Clinton presidency will be a boon for the Wealth and Powerful. rhett o rick Apr 2016 #43
Kock brothers cheered Sanders too. You are into playing their game? seabeyond Apr 2016 #45
the billionaires love Clinton, the neocons love Clinton, Prisons For Profits love Clinton. rhett o rick Apr 2016 #47
No they have not, but you keep telling yourself that if it helps you sleep at night. n/t JTFrog Apr 2016 #44
"POLL: Voters don't trust Hillary Clinton" rhett o rick Apr 2016 #48
the dnc said? lol fuck that's good stuff. lol wendylaroux Apr 2016 #37
Search results were NOT downloaded! leftinportland Apr 2016 #53
You are wrong. NH. NCTraveler Apr 2016 #55
K&R ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #58
K & R Scurrilous Apr 2016 #79
K & R Maru Kitteh Apr 2016 #80
k&r Starry Messenger Apr 2016 #82
DNC was correct in their response, @BernieSanders drops Baseless lawsuit riversedge Apr 2016 #89
says who? snowy owl Apr 2016 #90
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»DNC was correct in their ...»Reply #0