HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Politics 2014 (Forum) » What Did Women Ever Do to... » Reply #24
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Response to McCamy Taylor (Original post)

Thu Oct 25, 2012, 09:48 AM

24. Great points all

... but I am going to break rank a bit on the theme of women as a consolidated group of victims.

There is a sociologically documented set of behaviors among women that suggest that women do not collaborate well with other women. Rather than being genetically programmed to cooperate in the hunt, it is theorized that women's evolutionary strategic advantage was manifest in a superior ability to obtain a larger share of the fruit of the kill for her own offspring once the hunt was over .

Now of course that runs slightly counter to other examples in the world where the females hunt and the male enforces domestic order (e.g., lion pride). But if you accept the archeological evidence that the prehistoric human male was running the hunt, it follows that a female would have the role of domestic head-of-state. In fact, many tribal cultures were/are in fact matriarchal and/or matrillineal.

Anyway, with responsibility for the "politics" of resource allocation in the hunter-gatherer context, you have some vestiges of competitive pragmatism still observable in female behavior. We call it "jealous" or "catty" behavior. It involves a subconscious recognition that there is only so much "food" in the pot.

So, as the golden years set in, the scenario goes, the food in the pot is the eternal reward. And those women who are out there ready to throw their sisters under the bus of the Republican machine have one thing in mind - securing their ticket through the Pearly Gates - regardless of what their higher-order consciousness might be expected to decide rationally. (Don't jump all over me, clearly not everyone in their "golden years" thinks like this, but you'll hopefully agree that the demographics are in line somewhat with the proposition that older women are more likely to vote Republican for religious reasons). Similarly, the "uneducated" woman, who perhaps had children right out of high-school and had her ambitions foreclosed upon subconsciously reasons in the "competitive" model that handing out contraception to these Georgetown coeds is giving them an unfair advantage in the "resource scrounging" game.

Now that's not to say that there aren't "competitive" men out there, who view their male coworkers as potential threats rather than potential allies, and NOR do I personally beleive that all women think this way. And unfortunately I can't put my hands on the article that presented these findings about female behavior, but if you look around it is out there.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 40 replies Author Time Post
McCamy Taylor Oct 2012 OP
temporary311 Oct 2012 #1
libodem Oct 2012 #4
Warpy Oct 2012 #7
libodem Oct 2012 #37
Warpy Oct 2012 #38
libodem Oct 2012 #39
DCKit Oct 2012 #2
ProudProgressiveNow Oct 2012 #3
defacto7 Oct 2012 #5
HeiressofBickworth Oct 2012 #6
LisaL Oct 2012 #8
oldbanjo Oct 2012 #12
whttevrr Oct 2012 #9
Ivywoods55 Oct 2012 #10
Waiting For Everyman Oct 2012 #11
oldbanjo Oct 2012 #13
UCmeNdc Oct 2012 #14
-LOKI -BAD FOR YA Oct 2012 #15
Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2012 #16
Alekei_Firebird Oct 2012 #32
Rain Mcloud Oct 2012 #17
RobinA Oct 2012 #18
calico1 Oct 2012 #19
Fresh_Start Oct 2012 #20
CTyankee Oct 2012 #21
BlueDemKev Oct 2012 #22
bemildred Oct 2012 #23
LineReply Great points all
nobunnyclue Oct 2012 #24
HopeHoops Oct 2012 #25
Zoeisright Oct 2012 #26
Arugula Latte Oct 2012 #27
Texin Oct 2012 #29
Arugula Latte Oct 2012 #30
LongTomH Oct 2012 #28
Alekei_Firebird Oct 2012 #31
ggranberry Oct 2012 #33
JHB Oct 2012 #34
Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #35
gkhouston Oct 2012 #36
RomneyLies Oct 2012 #40
Please login to view edit histories.