Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
Sun Feb 7, 2016, 09:34 PM Feb 2016

The concept of health care as a right cannot be implemented "incrementally". [View all]

Last edited Mon Feb 8, 2016, 03:05 AM - Edit history (2)

It is a conversation that strikes to the very core of the social contract between the state and the citizen that needs to happen.

And only Bernie Sanders is talking about it.


69 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Some folks want to choose how they get financial access to system. Hoyt Feb 2016 #1
The policies that actually provide healthcare to people can, though. DanTex Feb 2016 #2
Let's suppose (though I think it is nonsense) that ONLY Hillary could increase the number Bonobo Feb 2016 #3
Bernie might too, as long as he drops the single payer fantasy. DanTex Feb 2016 #7
Your last line ends in a non-sequitur Lordquinton Feb 2016 #52
Your analogy is so clear - thanks left lowrider Feb 2016 #58
Thank you for saying so. nt Bonobo Feb 2016 #59
I thought your argument was only She would beat back a Republican Victory Rilgin Feb 2016 #5
That's true also. And that is the most important thing. DanTex Feb 2016 #8
Bernie is more likely to win against eh Republicans Lordquinton Feb 2016 #53
Please explain how she gets a bill to expand the ACA through Congress. jeff47 Feb 2016 #6
He can't...neither can she though... TCJ70 Feb 2016 #9
She doesn't. It'll have to be executive actions, I don't see much coming out of congress. DanTex Feb 2016 #10
I don't get it. Old Crow Feb 2016 #11
GE polls this far out are meaningless. Everyone knows this. DanTex Feb 2016 #13
That's an interesting response. Old Crow Feb 2016 #17
It's a factual response. Astrological charts are data also. Also meaningless. DanTex Feb 2016 #18
Not a factual response. Old Crow Feb 2016 #20
Astrological charts do contain data. It's just that it's useless, as are GE polls this far out. DanTex Feb 2016 #21
I disagree strongly. Old Crow Feb 2016 #23
Of course you do. That's what usually happens when I present a factual case to Bernie fans. DanTex Feb 2016 #27
Your condescension and snide tone don't help your argument. Old Crow Feb 2016 #32
You should read past the first paragraph of the Vox article. DanTex Feb 2016 #34
You can't drop the condescension, can you? Old Crow Feb 2016 #36
Always a good time! DanTex Feb 2016 #37
The polls are meaningless, but your psychic revelations aren't? HERVEPA Feb 2016 #43
You forgot to be specific. jeff47 Feb 2016 #22
It'll be great watching Sanders amend bills from the White House. Umm, wait. DanTex Feb 2016 #24
You forgot to list what executive actions Clinton can take jeff47 Feb 2016 #28
Post removed Post removed Feb 2016 #31
Still got no list? But you claimed she had a plan, Dan. jeff47 Feb 2016 #33
You think I'm just going to forget that you fabricate quotes out of thin air in order to support DanTex Feb 2016 #35
C'mon Dan. It would be wrong to promise something she could never get, right? jeff47 Feb 2016 #41
Man, you sure don't want to talk about fabricated quotes! DanTex Feb 2016 #42
Change your words? Your words are right there. jeff47 Feb 2016 #46
He's dead, Jim. nt Bonobo Feb 2016 #50
He's pining for the fjords. (nt) jeff47 Feb 2016 #51
An ex-parrot. nt Bonobo Feb 2016 #54
Can't respond. He's on a time out. n/t Contrary1 Feb 2016 #60
Well, he couldn't respond before the time out either. (nt) jeff47 Feb 2016 #64
tell us more about the quotes, Jeff. bettyellen Feb 2016 #66
What quotes? jeff47 Feb 2016 #67
the fabricated quotes! got a link, so I can see how untrue the accusation was? bettyellen Feb 2016 #68
A link to I have no idea what he's talking about? jeff47 Feb 2016 #69
especially when the "increments" are AWAY FROM the actual goal Doctor_J Feb 2016 #4
KnR SammyWinstonJack Feb 2016 #12
another K&R Ferd Berfel Feb 2016 #14
Then, I guess . ... ThreeWayFanny Feb 2016 #15
K&R CharlotteVale Feb 2016 #16
Even though I recall the passing of Medicare, SheilaT Feb 2016 #19
When Social Security was first enacted, very few women or minorities were covered. Much better now. Hoyt Feb 2016 #25
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #26
Kicked and recommended! Enthusiast Feb 2016 #29
Kicked and Recced eom Arazi Feb 2016 #30
That's because "concepts" aren't implemented. Plans are implemented. pnwmom Feb 2016 #38
K&R. Thanks, Bonobo. senz Feb 2016 #39
Right on. You can definitely say that again. highprincipleswork Feb 2016 #40
Remember the incremental approach for African-American rights? DrBulldog Feb 2016 #44
Several years ago, a Scandinavian country was changing from the right lane to the right lane -- Akamai Feb 2016 #45
But you have to admit, that's not much of a change. cui bono Feb 2016 #48
FYI (#5) HERVEPA Feb 2016 #47
If you don't live in that world, it doesn't seem such an obvious point Babel_17 Feb 2016 #49
Yes, I'm afraid that's true. Bonobo Feb 2016 #55
Kinda depends. zipplewrath Feb 2016 #56
Yes, but that "goal" is health insurance for all that does not (directly) advance the notion Bonobo Feb 2016 #57
+1 n/t area51 Feb 2016 #61
K & R LWolf Feb 2016 #62
While rights are absolute, the implementation of MineralMan Feb 2016 #63
Bernie's plan will put most of Utopian Leftist Feb 2016 #65
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The concept of health car...»Reply #0