Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)According To The NYT... The Clinton's Were Not Pleased With Last Night's Results [View all]
Little Separates Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton in Tight Race in IowaBy PATRICK HEALY - NYT
FEB. 2, 2016
Blake Cooper Griffin, center, a volunteer from Los Angeles, watched the results come in at Hillary Clintons rally in Des Moines. Credit Doug Mills/The New York Times
DES MOINES Hillary Clinton and Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont were locked in an intensely tight race in the Iowa caucuses on Tuesday as Mrs. Clintons strong support among women and older voters was matched by the passionate liberal foot soldiers whom Mr. Sanders has been calling to political revolution.
The close results were deeply unnerving to Mrs. Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, as well as her advisers, some of whom had expressed growing confidence in recent days that they had recaptured political momentum after weeks when Mr. Sanders was drawing huge crowds and rising in the polls. The Clintons had appeared optimistic at rallies over the weekend, thanking Iowans for their support as much as urging them to turn out to vote.
The close vote means that Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Sanders are likely to split Iowas share of delegates to the Democratic convention, and Mr. Sanders will be able to argue that the Iowa result was a virtual tie.
The Clinton team was counting on its huge, well-trained army of volunteers, covering all of Iowas 1,681 voting precincts, to counter the enormous enthusiasm of voters who jammed into events to hear Mr. Sanders. But his well-financed Iowa organization was able to convert the energy of his crowds into voters on Monday night, as he drew huge numbers of first-time caucusgoers, young people and liberals who responded to his rallying cry against the nations rigged economy.
The virtual tie between the two candidates instantly raised the stakes for their next face-off, the primary next Tuesday in New Hampshire. Mr. Sanders holds a solid lead in polls there and has the advantage of being from Vermont; candidates from neighboring states have won the states primary in recent decades, and Mr. Sanders is admired in the state.
Clinton advisers said late Monday night that Mr. and Mrs. Clinton were discussing bringing on additional staff members to strengthen her campaign operation now that a pitched battle may lie ahead against Mr. Sanders. The advisers said they did not know if a significant staff shakeup was at hand, but they said that the Clintons were disappointed with Monday nights result and wanted to ensure that her organization, political messaging and communications strategy were in better shape for the contests to come.
At her caucus night party here, Mrs. Clinton sought to put the best face on a tight result that had nearly half of Democrats voting against her.
The close results were deeply unnerving to Mrs. Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, as well as her advisers, some of whom had expressed growing confidence in recent days that they had recaptured political momentum after weeks when Mr. Sanders was drawing huge crowds and rising in the polls. The Clintons had appeared optimistic at rallies over the weekend, thanking Iowans for their support as much as urging them to turn out to vote.
The close vote means that Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Sanders are likely to split Iowas share of delegates to the Democratic convention, and Mr. Sanders will be able to argue that the Iowa result was a virtual tie.
The Clinton team was counting on its huge, well-trained army of volunteers, covering all of Iowas 1,681 voting precincts, to counter the enormous enthusiasm of voters who jammed into events to hear Mr. Sanders. But his well-financed Iowa organization was able to convert the energy of his crowds into voters on Monday night, as he drew huge numbers of first-time caucusgoers, young people and liberals who responded to his rallying cry against the nations rigged economy.
The virtual tie between the two candidates instantly raised the stakes for their next face-off, the primary next Tuesday in New Hampshire. Mr. Sanders holds a solid lead in polls there and has the advantage of being from Vermont; candidates from neighboring states have won the states primary in recent decades, and Mr. Sanders is admired in the state.
Clinton advisers said late Monday night that Mr. and Mrs. Clinton were discussing bringing on additional staff members to strengthen her campaign operation now that a pitched battle may lie ahead against Mr. Sanders. The advisers said they did not know if a significant staff shakeup was at hand, but they said that the Clintons were disappointed with Monday nights result and wanted to ensure that her organization, political messaging and communications strategy were in better shape for the contests to come.
At her caucus night party here, Mrs. Clinton sought to put the best face on a tight result that had nearly half of Democrats voting against her.
Link: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/02/us/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-democratic-iowa-caucus.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
114 replies, 9356 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (122)
ReplyReply to this post
114 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
According To The NYT... The Clinton's Were Not Pleased With Last Night's Results [View all]
WillyT
Feb 2016
OP
Me too. My candidate has momentum essentially catching the front runner as they are going into NH.
Ed Suspicious
Feb 2016
#21
Nobody said it was victory. We merely pointed out that Cinton won the first primary.
Nitram
Feb 2016
#109
Clintons are trying to spin a humbling tie as a win; any "win" is due to a coin toss, at best:
amborin
Feb 2016
#6
Iowa is winner take all? I mean a prohibitive favorite isn't so prohibitive with a one point lead
Ed Suspicious
Feb 2016
#23
Coffee exits mouth and nostrils and strikes monitor at the speed of hystical laughter - nt
KingCharlemagne
Feb 2016
#49
She should be unhappy. A 5 point win would have put the Sanders candidacy in serious jeopardy
corkhead
Feb 2016
#13
That was obvious from the look on Big Dogs face during Hillary''s "victory speech".
Autumn
Feb 2016
#16
Or Walmart, they are closing lots of stores so all those unemployed people
Motown_Johnny
Feb 2016
#24
I think the Clintons were a bit shocked because their internal polling told them
Jarqui
Feb 2016
#32
"covering all of Iowa’s 1,681 voting precincts" (nope not in Pacific Junction)
Omaha Steve
Feb 2016
#34
That's why she said, "I breathed a big sigh of relief". This 'wake-up' will move them both closer.
Sunlei
Feb 2016
#36
They could have--should have--knocked Bernie out with their caucus experience, their ground
TwilightGardener
Feb 2016
#59