Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Science

Jim__

(14,075 posts)

5. 134 million processors and 17 quadrillion operations per second is incredible.

Reply to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Fri Jan 18, 2013, 04:57 PM

Jan 2013

I am curious as to how the cost and effectiveness of this compares to software correlators. Do they currently have software correlators that can handle arrays of this size?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A Supercomputer Fit to Dominate the Cosmos [View all] Judi Lynn Jan 2013 OP

Yeah, yeah. mr_hat Jan 2013 #1

Dream on. longship Jan 2013 #4

Aha!! The Great Hyperbolic Omni-Cognate Neutron Wrangler longship Jan 2013 #2

nicely done... n/t ProdigalJunkMail Jan 2013 #7

Paranoia strikes deep Fumesucker Jan 2013 #3

Bouncy bubble beverage anyone? /nt TheMadMonk Jan 2013 #10

134 million processors and 17 quadrillion operations per second is incredible. Jim__ Jan 2013 #5

They have to have it sakabatou Jan 2013 #6

Dominate the Cosmos? tama Jan 2013 #8

yeah, but can it post good benches with 3DMark on Crysis 2? n/t OneTenthofOnePercent Jan 2013 #9