Religion’s surprising emotional sense: New atheists are wrong again [View all]
Non-believers call me dogmatic, self-righteous, judgmental. Maybe they are. Here's what they miss about belief
Saturday, Nov 2, 2013 08:00 AM EDT
By Francis Spufford
My daughter has just turned six. Some time over the next year or so, she will discover that her parents are weird. Were weird because we go to church.
This meanswell, as she gets older therell be voices telling her what it means, getting louder and louder until by the time shes a teenager theyll be shouting right in her ear. It means that we believe in a load of bronze-age absurdities. It means that we dont believe in dinosaurs.
It means that were dogmatic. That were self-righteous. That we fetishize pain and suffering. That we advocate wishy-washy niceness. That we promise the oppressed pie in the sky when they die. That were bleeding hearts who dont understand the wealth-creating powers of the market. That were too stupid to understand the irrationality of our creeds. That we build absurdly complex intellectual structures, full of meaningless distinctions, on the marshmallow foundations of a fantasy. That we uphold the nuclear family, with all its micro-tyrannies and imprisoning stereotypes. That were the hairshirted enemies of the ordinary family pleasures of parenthood, shopping, sex and car ownership. That were savagely judgmental. That wed free murderers to kill again. That we think everyone who disagrees with us is going to roast for all eternity. That were as bad as Muslims. That were worse than Muslims, because Muslims are primitives who cant be expected to know any better. That were better than Muslims, but only because weve lost the courage of our convictions. That were infantile and cant do without an illusory daddy in the sky. That we destroy the spontaneity and hopefulness of children by implanting a sick mythology in your minds. That we oppose freedom, human rights, gay rights, individual moral autonomy, a womans right to choose, stem cell research, the use of condoms in fighting AIDS, the teaching of evolutionary biology. Modernity. Progress. That we think everyone should be cowering before authority. That we sanctify the idea of hierarchy. That we get all snooty and yuck-no-thanks about transsexuals, but think its perfectly normal for middle-aged men to wear purple dresses. That we cover up child abuse, because we care more about power than justice. That were the villains in history, on the wrong side of every struggle for human liberty. That if we sometimes seem to have been on the right side of one of said struggles, we werent really; or the struggle wasnt about what it appeared to be about; or we didnt really do the right thing for the reasons we said we did. That weve provided pious cover stories for racism, imperialism, wars of conquest, slavery, exploitation. That weve manufactured imaginary causes for real people to kill each other. That were stuck in the past. That we destroy tribal cultures. That we think the worlds going to end. That we want to help the world to end. That we teach people to hate their own natural selves. That we want people to be afraid. That we want people to be ashamed. That we have an imaginary friend; that we believe in a sky pixie; that we prostrate ourselves before a god who has the reality status of Santa Claus. That we prefer scripture to novels, preaching to storytelling, certainty to doubt, faith to reason, law to mercy, primary colors to shades, censorship to debate, silence to eloquence, death to life.
But hey, thats not the bad news. Those are the objections of people who care enough about religion to object to itor to rent a set of recreational objections from Richard Dawkins or Christopher Hitchens. As accusations, they may be a hodge-podge, a mish-mash of truths and half-truths and untruths plucked from radically different parts of Christian history and the Christian world, with the part continually taken for the whole (if the part is damaging) or the whole for the part (if its flattering)but at least they assume theres a thing called religion there which looms with enough definition and significance to be detested. In fact theres something truly devoted about the way that Dawkinsites manage to extract a stimulating hobby from the thought of other peoples belief. The ones in this country must be envious of the intensity of the anti-religious struggle in the United States; yet some of them even contrive to feel oppressed by the Church of England, which is not easy to do. It must take a deft delicacy at operating on a tiny scale, like doing needlepoint, or playing Subbuteo, or fitting a whole model-railway layout into an attaché case.
http://www.salon.com/2013/11/02/religions_surprising_emotional_sense_new_atheists_are_wrong_again/
Excerpted from Unapologetic: Why, Despite Everything, Christianity Still Makes Surprising Emotional Sense. Copyright © 2013 by Francis Spufford. Reprinted with permission from HarperOne, a division of HarperCollinsPublishers.