Response to Thats my opinion (Reply #18)
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 06:43 AM
skepticscott (7,443 posts)
22. Most of the writing about Mother Teresa
has been uncritical fawning. Her awards came long before Hitchens and others exposed her as something less than the angel of mercy she was always portrayed as. Here is part of what you didn't include from that same Wikipedia sketch:
The German magazine Stern published a critical article on the first anniversary of Mother Teresa's death. This concerned allegations regarding financial matters and the spending of donations. The medical press has also published criticism of her, arising from very different outlooks and priorities on patients' needs. Other critics include Tariq Ali of the New Left Review and the Irish investigative journalist Donal MacIntyre.
She has also been criticized for her view on suffering. She felt that suffering would bring people closer to Jesus. Sanal Edamaruku, President of Rationalist International, criticised the failure to give painkillers, writing that in her Homes for the Dying, one could "hear the screams of people having maggots tweezered from their open wounds without pain relief. On principle, strong painkillers are even in hard cases not given. According to Mother Teresa's philosophy, it is 'the most beautiful gift for a person that he can participate in the sufferings of Christ'."
Dr. Robin Fox, editor of The Lancet, described the medical care as "haphazard", as volunteers without medical knowledge had to take decisions about patient care, because of the lack of doctors. He observed that her order did not distinguish between curable and incurable patients, so that people who could otherwise survive would be at risk of dying from infections and lack of treatment. Dr. Fox makes it a point to contrast hospice, on the one hand, with what he calls "Mother Teresa's Care for the Dying" on the other hand; noting that, while hospice emphasizes minimizing suffering with professional medical care and attention to expressed needs and wishes of the patient, her approach does not.
Colette Livermore, a former Missionary of Charity, describes her reasons for leaving the order in her book Hope Endures: Leaving Mother Teresa, Losing Faith, and Searching for Meaning. Livermore found what she called Mother Teresa's "theology of suffering" to be flawed, despite being a good and courageous person. Though Mother Teresa instructed her followers on the importance of spreading the Gospel through actions rather than theological lessons, Livermore could not reconcile this with some of the practices of the organization. Examples she gives include unnecessarily refusing to help the needy when they approached the nuns at the wrong time according to the prescribed schedule, discouraging nuns from seeking medical training to deal with the illnesses they encountered (with the justification that God empowers the weak and ignorant), and imposition of "unjust" punishments, such as being transferred away from friends.
Christopher Hitchens and the German magazine Stern have said Mother Teresa did not focus donated money on alleviating poverty or improving the conditions of her hospices, but on opening new convents and increasing missionary work.
More about the phony picture that has been painted of Mother Teresa here:
And of course, none of this has any direct relevance to the more fundamental point I've made about your claims regarding "moral law".
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
|Thats my opinion||Jan 2012||OP|
|Why Syzygy||Jan 2012||#1|
|mr blur||Jan 2012||#4|
|Thats my opinion||Jan 2012||#9|
|Thats my opinion||Jan 2012||#16|
|Thats my opinion||Jan 2012||#18|
Most of the writing about Mother Teresa
|Thats my opinion||Jan 2012||#26|
Please login to view edit histories.