Religion
In reply to the discussion: The Problem with Religious Moderates [View all]humblebum
(5,881 posts)Why is that? I have said that the subject has been addressed ad nauseam and that examples, references, and explanations have been presented. It really doesn't matter whether you agree or not.
Now if you have never participated in such discussions, then I can understand how you think the subject has never been discussed. However, if you have participated in such exchanges then you are indeed lying or very forgetful.
And it seems that after each discussion you deny that such even took place. so I can only assume that you would do so again. Therefore, tell me that you have never been involved in such discussions if you think that the matter has never been discussed before.
I don't play your games anymore. Two ways of knowing, no three, have already been been mentioned in this thread. Empiricism, Rational Empiricism, and by implication, Rationalism.