Religion
In reply to the discussion: Happy Birthday, Carl Sagan! [View all]skepticscott
(13,029 posts)from a lot of people claiming that "Our inability to perceive certain things means they don't exist." (which was a blatant lie) to a lot of people claiming that "Our inability to prove certain things means they don't exist." or "Our inability to scientifically prove certain things means they don't exist." or "Our inability to provide scientific evidence for certain things means they don't exist"
In fact, all of those claims are blatant lies, which you have no evidence for whatsoever. Slice up shit any way you want, and it still smells like shit. I defy you to show us anyone making any of those claims.
And to reiterate what trotsky said above (but which you either ignored or couldn't grasp): requesting "scientific proof" of something is not the same as saying that if something cannot be perceived, it doesn't exist. For things which are amenable to scientific evidence, I require it before I accept (provisionally) something as true or existent. For you to argue that failing at a particular point in time to find sufficient evidence that something exists is the same as claiming that it DOESN'T exist, can't possibly exist or that the evidence will NEVER be found is simply idiotic.