Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

In reply to the discussion: Why is there evil and suffering? [View all]
 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
99. I think we need a capital Y at the end too
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 10:23 PM
Oct 2012

It has to be a MysterY, right? Or can it just be a MyStErY?

Why is there evil and suffering? [View all] Thats my opinion Oct 2012 OP
Love the phrase mr_hat Oct 2012 #1
agreed. life sucks because we have free will. it can bebetter if we roguevalley Oct 2012 #17
God is what we invoke at the limits of our knowledge... DreamGypsy Oct 2012 #2
Because god is quite the bastard. mysuzuki2 Oct 2012 #3
Hmmm. Fix The Stupid Oct 2012 #4
I like this very much! Look at the universe; how can ANY words encompass that event? It IS its own patrice Oct 2012 #5
In th past GOD filled in the empty places in knowledge of the universe... Agnosticsherbet Oct 2012 #6
Today's theology does not deny science, but celebrates it. Thats my opinion Oct 2012 #7
It's not that the mind is closed Oregonian Oct 2012 #9
In any of the DU forums or groups, Thats my opinion Oct 2012 #20
Were you to produce rrneck Oct 2012 #24
The problem he has Oregonian Oct 2012 #33
Reads like new age word salad to me. rrneck Oct 2012 #38
"the "insights" you speak of spark squarely from the anus of the "theologians"" cleanhippie Oct 2012 #27
There was far more snark in your post Oregonian Oct 2012 #32
We can see the emperor has no clothes. trotsky Oct 2012 #60
Best. Post. Ever. cleanhippie Oct 2012 #30
Thanks, brother! n/t Oregonian Oct 2012 #31
ThatsMyOpinion usually pokes his head out and posts something like this every week or so. cleanhippie Oct 2012 #34
I have posted there some Oregonian Oct 2012 #35
You wanna see dead? Have a look at the Christian Liberals & Progressive People of Faith group. cleanhippie Oct 2012 #36
Ha ha, well played Oregonian Oct 2012 #37
Post removed Post removed Oct 2012 #46
As usual your post... rexcat Oct 2012 #55
Chalk one up for you kitten! Starboard Tack Oct 2012 #56
It will take a lot more... rexcat Oct 2012 #57
Precious, you need to learn the difference between blocking and ignoring. Starboard Tack Oct 2012 #58
I would consider "precious" as a derogatory remark... rexcat Oct 2012 #59
I celebrate what you have done with your life. nt Thats my opinion Oct 2012 #63
I am not looking for accolades... rexcat Oct 2012 #65
Do you celebrate the fact that he did those things sans religion? cleanhippie Oct 2012 #90
He doesn't give a shit, rexcat. His passive-aggressiveness is like the stripe on a skunks back. cleanhippie Oct 2012 #73
Agreed... rexcat Oct 2012 #74
And a jury felt the same way, as his post got hidden above. cleanhippie Oct 2012 #89
I can say I did not alert that one... rexcat Oct 2012 #96
This post was alerted on. The jury voted 5/1 to let it stand. ohiosmith Oct 2012 #80
Thanks, looks like a jury agreed that his passive-aggressive posts are not worthy of DU. cleanhippie Oct 2012 #86
Einstein had insights ... GeorgeGist Oct 2012 #44
Einstein had insights ... AlbertCat Oct 2012 #47
Yes, it really is that the mind is closed. humblebum Oct 2012 #70
Thank you. whathehell Oct 2012 #129
Sheesh, could you possibly be any more arrogant and self-centered? skepticscott Oct 2012 #15
Yes, he could be a radical atheist. nt humblebum Oct 2012 #71
Which theology? Baptist Theology? Dominionist Theology? Agnosticsherbet Oct 2012 #134
The narrative myths that fit things together were the function of the pluraltheistic religions, with patrice Oct 2012 #131
So.....atheism? Oregonian Oct 2012 #8
"Modern theology is rapidly getting rid of this sky wizard notion of God" trotsky Oct 2012 #10
He just admitted he is an atheist. rrneck Oct 2012 #25
True, because changing your narrative/perspective does not necessarily change the nature of the patrice Oct 2012 #82
Yep. rrneck Oct 2012 #88
I think you guys are on to something here. TMO is essentially "coming out" cleanhippie Oct 2012 #91
Well said. Very well said! patrice Oct 2012 #92
That has got to be one of the silliest statements ever Fortinbras Armstrong Oct 2012 #28
You are wrong. trotsky Oct 2012 #40
I think you have misread his statement. Please read it again. cleanhippie Oct 2012 #42
You're right, I misread it. My apologies Fortinbras Armstrong Oct 2012 #103
I don't disagree. rrneck Oct 2012 #11
Of course. Thats my opinion Oct 2012 #21
Theology isn't changing anything but the narrative. rrneck Oct 2012 #22
God is best understood as a verb, not a noun. What's the past tense? n/t dimbear Oct 2012 #12
Gad! skepticscott Oct 2012 #14
I like it. dimbear Oct 2012 #16
Theologians don't have "insights" skepticscott Oct 2012 #13
Nail on the head. n/t trotsky Oct 2012 #18
Thus speaks someone who does not understand theology Fortinbras Armstrong Oct 2012 #29
Post removed Post removed Oct 2012 #39
Is there an argument in there anywhere? skepticscott Oct 2012 #51
Science doesn't give us all the understanding we have QuantumOfPeace Oct 2012 #53
The fact that science can't answer ALL questions skepticscott Oct 2012 #62
I doubt your skepticism QuantumOfPeace Oct 2012 #66
As mentioned, Christian theology has had skepticscott Oct 2012 #68
Shows you how to be a righteous dude, among other things? QuantumOfPeace Oct 2012 #69
Well, I was expecting someone to say something intelligent skepticscott Oct 2012 #94
You do know that science and ethics are different disciplines, right? QuantumOfPeace Oct 2012 #97
The entire point is skepticscott Oct 2012 #98
Atheism is not a conclusion, it is a preference QuantumOfPeace Oct 2012 #102
Atheism reflects a preference skepticscott Oct 2012 #106
Atheism is the rejection of theism. cleanhippie Oct 2012 #138
Sam Harris makes an excellent case in The Moral Landscape that counters you. cleanhippie Oct 2012 #137
Matthew 7:6 Leontius Oct 2012 #19
The question often arises as to where one can find the seat of this theology,. Thats my opinion Oct 2012 #64
Do those all deny the resurrection, then? muriel_volestrangler Oct 2012 #75
The resurrection is still very important. Thats my opinion Oct 2012 #79
The story they were committed to was the resurrection muriel_volestrangler Oct 2012 #84
Just slap a capital M on Mystery and call it done. n/t trotsky Oct 2012 #85
I think we need a capital Y at the end too skepticscott Oct 2012 #99
You raised a couple of very good issues. Thats my opinion Oct 2012 #110
Was Paul even there?? Angry Dragon Oct 2012 #112
No, Paul never met or saw Jesus. Thats my opinion Oct 2012 #114
Doing what exactly? Warren Stupidity Oct 2012 #23
I didn't know you were an atheist. rrneck Oct 2012 #26
Word salad. No thanks, I've eaten. mr blur Oct 2012 #41
I would love to have an intelligent conversation about religion. Can you kindly explain what the prefunk Oct 2012 #43
Put aside your prejudices, and try reading the original post nt Thats my opinion Oct 2012 #49
Try not being so condescending, please. I did read the OP, and found it ambiguous. prefunk Oct 2012 #93
That like asking the pope skepticscott Oct 2012 #100
Perhaps these are not new insights, but the recapulation of what we have known for a long time. Thats my opinion Oct 2012 #109
So if there are NOT any "amazing new insights", just what is it you are talking about? prefunk Oct 2012 #119
It is a religion skepticscott Oct 2012 #121
All religions only point. None of them encapsulate the truth, the whole truth, Thats my opinion Oct 2012 #122
So what does that have to do with organized religion and it's charachters? prefunk Oct 2012 #123
They are all efforts to point to that which is beyond all of them. Thats my opinion Oct 2012 #124
So lets go back to these new insights. prefunk Oct 2012 #125
Hello? Still there? prefunk Oct 2012 #139
Anyone home? prefunk Oct 2012 #140
"Not new insights"? skepticscott Oct 2012 #120
Is it safe to assume that you will not be answering my call for clarification? prefunk Oct 2012 #107
As predicted skepticscott Oct 2012 #108
See 109--and please be more specific about your question and I'll try to respond. nt Thats my opinion Oct 2012 #113
Nature ... GeorgeGist Oct 2012 #45
Perhaps the best metaphor for the earth is "Mother." An acient use. Thats my opinion Oct 2012 #81
Why is there evil and suffering? AlbertCat Oct 2012 #48
What if thinking the world is "evil" creates more "evil"? QuantumOfPeace Oct 2012 #50
Fear and Greed thelordofhell Oct 2012 #52
A partial answer okasha Oct 2012 #54
If a god exists... trotsky Oct 2012 #61
Just one? That's easy QuantumOfPeace Oct 2012 #67
Um, please read the question again. trotsky Oct 2012 #72
Science is a superior means of obtaining knowledge okasha Oct 2012 #76
So you don't have an example. trotsky Oct 2012 #83
Were you expecting otherwise skepticscott Oct 2012 #87
Of course not. trotsky Oct 2012 #95
Just letting you have the low road to yourself, trots. okasha Oct 2012 #104
There you go. trotsky Oct 2012 #105
I'm not certain whether evil insists independently or whether it's the absence of good. no_hypocrisy Oct 2012 #77
Something like an energy field created by all living things? muriel_volestrangler Oct 2012 #78
I'm sure TMO and his gang skepticscott Oct 2012 #101
From your post you are saying that most religions are bunk Angry Dragon Oct 2012 #111
No, please read 109 nt Thats my opinion Oct 2012 #115
I now have read post #109 Angry Dragon Oct 2012 #116
I dislike the term "pagan." It has a pejortive ring. Thats my opinion Oct 2012 #117
Christian religions used that term and heathens for many years Angry Dragon Oct 2012 #118
Ego orpupilofnature57 Oct 2012 #126
There isn't evil, and suffering is an emotion brought on by ego TransitJohn Oct 2012 #127
How about this theory... Speck Tater Oct 2012 #128
You made me think of monads, patrice Oct 2012 #132
That second link is very interesting Speck Tater Oct 2012 #135
I really only have a Philosophy 101 acquaintence with Leibniz, but his was one of the thoughts patrice Oct 2012 #136
Maybe someday, someone will bring something new to a discussion about religion, but I doubt it. rogrot Oct 2012 #130
The preacher in Ecclesiastes had it right: there's nothing new under the sun. dimbear Oct 2012 #133
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Why is there evil and suf...»Reply #99