Religion

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)

45. Nice answer, Sarah Palin. n/t

Reply to Thats my opinion (Reply #33)

Tue Apr 17, 2012, 09:25 AM

Apr 2012

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

85 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Science has NO NEED TO reconcile with RELIGION ! [View all] SamG Apr 2012 OP

It depends on the religion somewhat. Catholic schools teach evolution and always have... Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #1

Do Catholic schools teach that reasonable people can... SamG Apr 2012 #2

Nope, but the Catholic Church followed the leader of the inventors of the Anti-Abortion movement... Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #4

I have been around since Bill Baird in the 1960's! SamG Apr 2012 #6

I was raised Catholic. I'm not saying the Catholic religion is not anti-abortion. Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #8

That's because the leaders are 100% male and those men Warpy Apr 2012 #9

Right... that's the problem... Joseph8th Apr 2012 #56

God created Evolution HockeyMom Apr 2012 #3

I know, and that's what I believe, too. The more science uncovers, the more I believe in a Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #5

None of that statement "God created Evolution" makes sense SamG Apr 2012 #7

It's better than the alternative HockeyMom Apr 2012 #10

+1 Very true! Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #14

Well, maybe. But maybe not. longship Apr 2012 #11

I didn't talk about people who do the believing based upon faith SamG Apr 2012 #12

The article to which I believe your refer (which I posted) was written by a scientist cbayer Apr 2012 #13

I don't think this thread has anything to do with your thread SamG Apr 2012 #17

You think I don't have a career or am bilingual? cbayer Apr 2012 #18

Speak to me in your other language, then. SamG Apr 2012 #19

Sorry, I don't take orders from you, but then again cbayer Apr 2012 #22

I agree. And we have an argument for that. longship Apr 2012 #15

Faith tama Apr 2012 #42

Yeah, but you forgot about quantum faith. cleanhippie Apr 2012 #43

I see tama Apr 2012 #46

You see? If you would stop trying to apply your narrow minded logic, you would know cleanhippie Apr 2012 #54

If there was such a thing tama Apr 2012 #60

How do you know there isn't? laconicsax Apr 2012 #71

How do you know tama Apr 2012 #72

The implication is that it doesn't. laconicsax Apr 2012 #73

I thought tama Apr 2012 #74

That's quite the obfuscation! laconicsax Apr 2012 #75

This is fun! tama Apr 2012 #76

Wrong, wrong, and wrong again. laconicsax Apr 2012 #77

Question about quantum-faith: DetlefK Apr 2012 #80

I suppose that would depend on what type of geometry is at play. laconicsax Apr 2012 #83

If there was such a thing as quantum faith, AlbertCat Apr 2012 #81

The word can mean many things AlbertCat Apr 2012 #49

OK tama Apr 2012 #52

Faith in its normal definition longship Apr 2012 #55

You don't have to take any person seriously, period. tama Apr 2012 #58

Well, I have faith that the moon is made of green cheese longship Apr 2012 #62

OK tama Apr 2012 #65

You mean that the moon may be made of green cheese? longship Apr 2012 #68

Lol! rug Apr 2012 #16

Reconciliation between science and religion isn't absolutely necessary, but... Silent3 Apr 2012 #20

And don't even get me started on the property settlement! cbayer Apr 2012 #21

Reconciling is simple -- science gets the last word on everything that can be observed starroute Apr 2012 #23

Once a believer said the following to anon-believer, Thats my opinion Apr 2012 #25

Love is a lot harder starroute Apr 2012 #32

"Now that you have deconstructed God, now deconstruct love." AlbertCat Apr 2012 #50

Except that... Joseph8th Apr 2012 #57

Science it not where it was in 1599. Neither is religion. nt Thats my opinion Apr 2012 #24

Would you care to comment upon which of the two has... SamG Apr 2012 #26

SILENCE for an hour on the question! I guess we know which SamG Apr 2012 #27

From TMO, silence is all you will get. cleanhippie Apr 2012 #28

It's a mixed bag. Thats my opinion Apr 2012 #78

You aren't making a key connection here. trotsky Apr 2012 #82

That's a hard thing to measure. rrneck Apr 2012 #29

Was it the science that did that, or the political and other convictions of those who SamG Apr 2012 #30

Like i said, it's hard to measure. rrneck Apr 2012 #31

Right, but... Joseph8th Apr 2012 #59

AFAIK tama Apr 2012 #64

I don't think the Nuremberg defense quite gets the job done. rrneck Apr 2012 #66

This message was self-deleted by its author Thats my opinion Apr 2012 #33

Nice answer, Sarah Palin. n/t Goblinmonger Apr 2012 #45

If by science tama Apr 2012 #34

This is the most accurate thing you've typed I think I've ever seen. trotsky Apr 2012 #35

Having studied tama Apr 2012 #38

"Whichcraft?" Is that anything like "Whatscraft" or "Whoscraft?" LAGC Apr 2012 #47

LOL tama Apr 2012 #48

I was once bit by wherecraft! OriginalGeek Apr 2012 #84

it's not something that happened during "theocratic" Middle Age AlbertCat Apr 2012 #51

Yup tama Apr 2012 #53

Well, scientists may need to if religion has a chair at the political table HereSince1628 Apr 2012 #36

Or more generally tama Apr 2012 #37

Scientists try to control social influences on science but you can't take HereSince1628 Apr 2012 #41

" 'Science' and 'Religion' are abstract nouns with little agreement over any exact definitions." humblebum Apr 2012 #63

Well, you have some good points. SamG Apr 2012 #39

Democracy is messy and comes without guarantees... HereSince1628 Apr 2012 #40

Very broad generalisations tama Apr 2012 #44

Agreed 100%!!! Joseph8th Apr 2012 #61

Molification of the above... Joseph8th Apr 2012 #67

Walls of Separation tama Apr 2012 #70

Thanks... love the music of those two groups of... Joseph8th Apr 2012 #79

Clearly, there are anti-scientific religious notions that do not need science's attetntion. Thats my opinion Apr 2012 #69

But it doesn't need to be. OriginalGeek Apr 2012 #85