Philip Adams in schism with the Dawkinsonians

[muriel_volestrangler]

16. Since the author of the article is the editor of the website, the headline should be considered part

of the article. It's ridiculous to think that some subordinate is mischaracterising his piece without his knowledge or approval.

And it is indeed a crappy "neer-neer, we're better than you" screed. "The one-eyed Dawkinsonians"? It's another claim that some atheists are 'fundamentalist'. However, since it acknowledges that Dawkins has perfectly amicable conversations with people like Rowan Williams, it's clear the hostility comes when idiots like Pell are involved.