Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Comment on the Bible [View all]zeemike
(18,998 posts)41. If I had used another law as the example would that have made a difference?
Or would you have insisted it was about that law too and not appropriate for this forum?
When people are pissed at you they can nit pick anything you say...you cannot win...and you cannot make any point no matter how carefully you craft your statements. And that stifles substantive dialogue...which might be the point of nit picking.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Having the Bible read to you is entirely different than reading it on your own.
darkstar3
Apr 2012
#32
So, in response to my request that you not make it personal, you make it even more personal.
cbayer
Apr 2012
#33
"But I'd love to hear your apologist thoughts on why Paul isn't those things."
ZombieHorde
Apr 2012
#25
Lol, I didn't get pissed off. Just thought your comment was not appropriate for this forum.
eqfan592
Apr 2012
#40
we should be grateful people do NOT do all the stuff the bible says they MUST do to
msongs
Apr 2012
#4
I'd suggest that they read it "selectively" ... and they count on you and I not
JoePhilly
Apr 2012
#17
They don't have to read the bible, that is for those non-christians.. see they are born-again.
LiberalArkie
Apr 2012
#10