Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

In reply to the discussion: The rise of atheism in America [View all]
 

laconicsax

(14,860 posts)
31. In this context, whether the action was fulfilling a job description.
Sat Apr 14, 2012, 10:49 PM
Apr 2012

I know you have issues with anyone having any authority of any sort, but you really need to understand that the groups on DU have specific purposes and when a discussion topic doesn't fit that purpose, hosts have a responsibility to lock the thread.

For example, if someone posts an OP in the science group that makes demonstrably false claims supporting the premise that all of modern biology is wrong because of an unexplained "quantum" mechanism, any of the group hosts have a responsibility to recognize that the post isn't about science and therefore doesn't fit the group SoP.

When locking such a thread, a host typically suggests a more suitable group for the discussion. If the OP is actually interested in having the discussion, they should start it in a more suitable group as suggested by the locking host.

There is a lot of talk about this whole phenomenon. cbayer Apr 2012 #1
The term "atheist" is a problem to many longship Apr 2012 #2
As long as they don't try to shove their beliefs down everybody's throat I just don't mind. AlbertCat Apr 2012 #15
Who does? All theists? cbayer Apr 2012 #21
As A Lifetime Atheist 1ProudAtheist Apr 2012 #3
While I like and respect your description of who you are and how you got there, cbayer Apr 2012 #4
Not all theists believe in "myths and fairy tales." eqfan592 Apr 2012 #12
Do you refer to "Greek Mythology"? Goblinmonger Apr 2012 #19
Why do you use the word "denounce" when speaking of higher beings? Gman Apr 2012 #5
Atheists Are Not Arrogant 1ProudAtheist Apr 2012 #6
Well... Gman Apr 2012 #7
Calling a myth a myth doesn't make one arrogant. eqfan592 Apr 2012 #10
We are just well educated and accepting of scientific fact rather than myths and fairy-tales. AlbertCat Apr 2012 #16
It is possible to be a scientist and a theist. cbayer Apr 2012 #22
While all religionists are theists, not all theists are religionists. eqfan592 Apr 2012 #24
That's not a well working hypothesis tama Apr 2012 #26
Buddhists are an exception to be sure. eqfan592 Apr 2012 #28
Yup tama Apr 2012 #30
To be a true Atheist: tama Apr 2012 #8
tama, I hate to say it, but posts such as this don't really aid your cause or your case. eqfan592 Apr 2012 #11
I'm aware tama Apr 2012 #17
LOL! laconicsax Apr 2012 #23
Your perception tama Apr 2012 #25
Yes I can. laconicsax Apr 2012 #27
And what is tama Apr 2012 #29
In this context, whether the action was fulfilling a job description. laconicsax Apr 2012 #31
That first point separates creationists from thinking people. laconicsax Apr 2012 #14
Yes it does tama Apr 2012 #18
Ooh! I get to be a "True Atheist?" How fun! laconicsax Apr 2012 #20
You do, of course, realize that all of that is only true for you? darkstar3 Apr 2012 #9
I tend to agree with you. (nt) eqfan592 Apr 2012 #13
LOL - Thanks for providing an example of the No True Scotsman fallacy! bananas Apr 2012 #32
I don't know that atheism is on the rise, just that more people are coming "out of the closet" about raccoon Apr 2012 #33
There are roughly 300 active atheists frogmarch Apr 2012 #34
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»The rise of atheism in Am...»Reply #31