Reply #5

In the discussion thread: Science has NO NEED TO reconcile with RELIGION ! [View all]

Sat Apr 14, 2012, 06:14 PM

5. I know, and that's what I believe, too. The more science uncovers, the more I believe in a

Last edited Sat Apr 14, 2012, 06:14 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

higher power. I don't have to deny science to have a sense of more powerful than I.

I wanted to add - there's no reason any religion has to be wedded to government.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

85 replies	Author	Time	Post
Science has NO NEED TO reconcile with RELIGION ! [View all]	SamG	Apr 2012	OP
It depends on the religion somewhat. Catholic schools teach evolution and always have...	Sarah Ibarruri	Apr 2012	#1
Do Catholic schools teach that reasonable people can...	SamG	Apr 2012	#2
Nope, but the Catholic Church followed the leader of the inventors of the Anti-Abortion movement...	Sarah Ibarruri	Apr 2012	#4
I have been around since Bill Baird in the 1960's!	SamG	Apr 2012	#6
I was raised Catholic. I'm not saying the Catholic religion is not anti-abortion.	Sarah Ibarruri	Apr 2012	#8
That's because the leaders are 100% male and those men	Warpy	Apr 2012	#9
Right... that's the problem...	Joseph8th	Apr 2012	#56
God created Evolution	HockeyMom	Apr 2012	#3
I know, and that's what I believe, too. The more science uncovers, the more I believe in a	Sarah Ibarruri	Apr 2012	#5
None of that statement "God created Evolution" makes sense	SamG	Apr 2012	#7
It's better than the alternative	HockeyMom	Apr 2012	#10
+1 Very true!	Starboard Tack	Apr 2012	#14
Well, maybe. But maybe not.	longship	Apr 2012	#11
I didn't talk about people who do the believing based upon faith	SamG	Apr 2012	#12
The article to which I believe your refer (which I posted) was written by a scientist	cbayer	Apr 2012	#13
I don't think this thread has anything to do with your thread	SamG	Apr 2012	#17
You think I don't have a career or am bilingual?	cbayer	Apr 2012	#18
Speak to me in your other language, then.	SamG	Apr 2012	#19
Sorry, I don't take orders from you, but then again	cbayer	Apr 2012	#22
I agree. And we have an argument for that.	longship	Apr 2012	#15
Faith	tama	Apr 2012	#42
Yeah, but you forgot about quantum faith.	cleanhippie	Apr 2012	#43
I see	tama	Apr 2012	#46
You see? If you would stop trying to apply your narrow minded logic, you would know	cleanhippie	Apr 2012	#54
If there was such a thing	tama	Apr 2012	#60
How do you know there isn't?	laconicsax	Apr 2012	#71
How do you know	tama	Apr 2012	#72
The implication is that it doesn't.	laconicsax	Apr 2012	#73
I thought	tama	Apr 2012	#74
That's quite the obfuscation!	laconicsax	Apr 2012	#75
This is fun!	tama	Apr 2012	#76
Wrong, wrong, and wrong again.	laconicsax	Apr 2012	#77
Question about quantum-faith:	DetlefK	Apr 2012	#80
I suppose that would depend on what type of geometry is at play.	laconicsax	Apr 2012	#83
If there was such a thing as quantum faith,	AlbertCat	Apr 2012	#81
The word can mean many things	AlbertCat	Apr 2012	#49
OK	tama	Apr 2012	#52
Faith in its normal definition	longship	Apr 2012	#55
You don't have to take any person seriously, period.	tama	Apr 2012	#58
Well, I have faith that the moon is made of green cheese	longship	Apr 2012	#62
OK	tama	Apr 2012	#65
You mean that the moon may be made of green cheese?	longship	Apr 2012	#68
Lol!	rug	Apr 2012	#16
Reconciliation between science and religion isn't absolutely necessary, but...	Silent3	Apr 2012	#20
And don't even get me started on the property settlement!	cbayer	Apr 2012	#21
Reconciling is simple -- science gets the last word on everything that can be observed	starroute	Apr 2012	#23
Once a believer said the following to anon-believer,	Thats my opinion	Apr 2012	#25
Love is a lot harder	starroute	Apr 2012	#32
"Now that you have deconstructed God, now deconstruct love."	AlbertCat	Apr 2012	#50
Except that...	Joseph8th	Apr 2012	#57
Science it not where it was in 1599. Neither is religion. nt	Thats my opinion	Apr 2012	#24
Would you care to comment upon which of the two has...	SamG	Apr 2012	#26
SILENCE for an hour on the question! I guess we know which	SamG	Apr 2012	#27
From TMO, silence is all you will get.	cleanhippie	Apr 2012	#28
It's a mixed bag.	Thats my opinion	Apr 2012	#78
You aren't making a key connection here.	trotsky	Apr 2012	#82
That's a hard thing to measure.	rrneck	Apr 2012	#29
Was it the science that did that, or the political and other convictions of those who	SamG	Apr 2012	#30
Like i said, it's hard to measure.	rrneck	Apr 2012	#31
Right, but...	Joseph8th	Apr 2012	#59
AFAIK	tama	Apr 2012	#64
I don't think the Nuremberg defense quite gets the job done.	rrneck	Apr 2012	#66
This message was self-deleted by its author	Thats my opinion	Apr 2012	#33
Nice answer, Sarah Palin. n/t	Goblinmonger	Apr 2012	#45
If by science	tama	Apr 2012	#34
This is the most accurate thing you've typed I think I've ever seen.	trotsky	Apr 2012	#35
Having studied	tama	Apr 2012	#38
"Whichcraft?" Is that anything like "Whatscraft" or "Whoscraft?"	LAGC	Apr 2012	#47
LOL	tama	Apr 2012	#48
I was once bit by wherecraft!	OriginalGeek	Apr 2012	#84
it's not something that happened during "theocratic" Middle Age	AlbertCat	Apr 2012	#51
Yup	tama	Apr 2012	#53
Well, scientists may need to if religion has a chair at the political table	HereSince1628	Apr 2012	#36
Or more generally	tama	Apr 2012	#37
Scientists try to control social influences on science but you can't take	HereSince1628	Apr 2012	#41
" 'Science' and 'Religion' are abstract nouns with little agreement over any exact definitions."	humblebum	Apr 2012	#63
Well, you have some good points.	SamG	Apr 2012	#39
Democracy is messy and comes without guarantees...	HereSince1628	Apr 2012	#40
Very broad generalisations	tama	Apr 2012	#44
Agreed 100%!!!	Joseph8th	Apr 2012	#61
Molification of the above...	Joseph8th	Apr 2012	#67
Walls of Separation	tama	Apr 2012	#70
Thanks... love the music of those two groups of...	Joseph8th	Apr 2012	#79
Clearly, there are anti-scientific religious notions that do not need science's attetntion.	Thats my opinion	Apr 2012	#69
But it doesn't need to be.	OriginalGeek	Apr 2012	#85

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.