Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Neil deGrasse Tyson explains why his Christmas tweet wasn’t ‘anti-Christian’ [View all]
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/12/29/neil-degrasse-tyson-explains-why-his-christmas-tweet-wasnt-anti-christian/By Abby Ohlheiser December 29 at 10:17 AM
Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson (Patrick Eccelsine/FOX)
On this day long ago, a child was born who, by age 30, would transform the world. Happy Birthday Isaac Newton b. Dec 25, 1642.
Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson tweeted that factoid on Christmas Day, which also happens to be Newtons birthday (depending on which calendar you use, but well get to that later). Some people werent happy about it, accusing Tyson of a Dickensian dismissal of Christmas spirit.
The backlash was enough to prompt Tyson to weigh in on the ordeal the following night.
Neil deGrasse Tyson ✔ @neiltyson
Follow
Imagine a world in which we are all enlightened by objective truths rather than offended by them.
6:05 PM - 26 Dec 2014
Follow
Imagine a world in which we are all enlightened by objective truths rather than offended by them.
6:05 PM - 26 Dec 2014
His tweet was followed by a lengthy Facebook post. Well. Its official. Far and away my most re-tweeted tweet appeared Christmas day, he began, adding:
My sense in this case is that the high rate of re-tweeting, is not to share my enthusiasm of this fact, but is driven by accusations that the tweet is somehow anti-Christian. If a person actually wanted to express anti-Christian sentiment, my guess is that alerting people of Isaac Newtons birthday would appear nowhere on the list.
As of Monday morning, the tweet in question had surpassed 77,000 retweets.
more at link
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
90 replies, 12659 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Neil deGrasse Tyson explains why his Christmas tweet wasn’t ‘anti-Christian’ [View all]
cbayer
Dec 2014
OP
Only an ignorant asshole, or an ingnorant moron could be offended by that tweet.
AtheistCrusader
Dec 2014
#1
I fear the offense has more to do with Dr. Tyson's skin color than what he says.
catbyte
Dec 2014
#8
Yes, I do. I don't think Sagan would be subjected to the same level of vitriol as Tyson is.
catbyte
Dec 2014
#55
Of course I agree that science and intelligence are vilified. How else to explain willfully ignorant
catbyte
Dec 2014
#67
Apparently you didn't know Sagan at all. He could be quite provocative.
AtheistCrusader
Dec 2014
#47
The only thing that was offensive about NdGT's tweet was that he bungled the history
unrepentant progress
Dec 2014
#81