Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)

6. The Better Path Is To Repeal The 2nd Amendment Then The Legal Parsing Is Not Such An Issue

Reply to Toronto (Reply #5)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 06:54 PM

Dec 2012

or impediment to change.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

327 people have been killed by dogs over the last 20 years [View all] Toronto Dec 2012 OP

not 20 children in one place in one minute by one person (or one dog) CreekDog Dec 2012 #1

Clearly those dogs had a mental illness SummerSnow Dec 2012 #2

Dogs don't kill people. It's the people aiming the dogs that kill people. Squinch Dec 2012 #28

breed specific legislation is largely based on gejohnston Dec 2012 #3

So, Are You Equating New Gun Laws With Past Pet Laws? It Seems As if You Are cantbeserious Dec 2012 #4

I'm just looking at the type of legislation Toronto Dec 2012 #5

The Better Path Is To Repeal The 2nd Amendment Then The Legal Parsing Is Not Such An Issue cantbeserious Dec 2012 #6

So while you're waiting for 2A to be repealed Toronto Dec 2012 #7

The Broader Goal Is 2nd Amendment Repeal - Each Incremental Gun Law Is A Gain Along That Trajectory cantbeserious Dec 2012 #8

re: "...Repeal The 2nd Amendment..." discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2012 #19

there was no added danger of pit bulls gejohnston Dec 2012 #11

I think because of your pro-gun agenda you are being Toronto Dec 2012 #15

no, they are usually the same illegal gun owners that gejohnston Dec 2012 #18

equating the basis for them gejohnston Dec 2012 #10

NRA talking point intaglio Dec 2012 #9

Not so fast bucko. Remmah2 Dec 2012 #34

LOL! n/t intaglio Dec 2012 #35

Actually the parallels between "pit bulls" and "assault weapons" are striking Recursion Dec 2012 #12

Crazy guys and dogs get the red out Dec 2012 #13

I see some significant problems with your idea. ... spin Dec 2012 #14

I was suggesting a one time mental test, Toronto Dec 2012 #16

I carefully reread your post ... spin Dec 2012 #26

at the risk of being cynical gejohnston Dec 2012 #17

So you are suggesting that 80 million people in our nation are dishonest and irresponsible ... spin Dec 2012 #20

that's not my opionion gejohnston Dec 2012 #22

My fault. I thought was relying to one of the draconian gun control supporters. ... spin Dec 2012 #37

a bit of stretch. LOL and spin wins the understatement of the year contest! Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2012 #23

Thanks for your support. (n/t) spin Dec 2012 #27

It wouldn't be the first time Toronto Dec 2012 #21

so if gejohnston Dec 2012 #24

Did I say anything about a weapons ban? Toronto Dec 2012 #25

they often don't have guns gejohnston Dec 2012 #29

Then I guess you wouldn't need an AR 15 Toronto Dec 2012 #30

I don't own one gejohnston Dec 2012 #31

Then you would be unlikely to be subject to any Toronto Dec 2012 #32

depends on how it affects pistols gejohnston Dec 2012 #33

I see some significant problems with your reasoning intaglio Dec 2012 #36