Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Media Ignores Call For Gun Violence Prevention In Loughner Sentencing Hearing [View all]fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)69. Do Tell Which One is Incorrect?
You support the NRA position on guns over the Democratic Convention party platform on guns?
You support the NRA position on guns over our Presidential Candidate position on guns who in the debates supported an AWB?
You support the NRA position on guns over MediaMatters position on guns?
If you think I guessed wrong, please tell me specifically which one is wrong to straighten me out.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
104 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Media Ignores Call For Gun Violence Prevention In Loughner Sentencing Hearing [View all]
SecularMotion
Nov 2012
OP
Loughner is a Mental Case and a call to our Nation to implement a liberal National Healthcare Policy
Tuesday Afternoon
Nov 2012
#2
Shit, my deer gun is termed by the Military as a Battle Rifle. Order of magnitude more powerful
AtheistCrusader
Nov 2012
#62
So just who the fuck are you to pass judgements on other Democrats?
friendly_iconoclast
Nov 2012
#81
So why do you think those who support more gun restrictions are failing so miserably?
aikoaiko
Nov 2012
#4
NRA expenditures for an example - perhaps you should be doing more research?
Dog Gone at Penigma
Nov 2012
#9
Actually, you need to read for content and understand the law better
ProgressiveProfessor
Nov 2012
#14
It says that the poster is clueless about the law and structure of these things
ProgressiveProfessor
Nov 2012
#80
Other than the position and standing from a long list of candidates
fightthegoodfightnow
Nov 2012
#84
If by myth, to claim that any effect they have is grossly exaggerated - YES
Dog Gone at Penigma
Nov 2012
#16
Then to what do you attribute the almost non-existence expansion of gun control laws?
aikoaiko
Nov 2012
#18
That question will not be answered by your interlocutor. Bet on it...
friendly_iconoclast
Nov 2012
#32
"Grass roots groups?" That's the trouble with the gun-control outlook: It isn't grassroots...
Eleanors38
Nov 2012
#22
NRA failure successfully to affect outcome of election, despite spending money
Dog Gone at Penigma
Nov 2012
#11
Rove AND the NRA BOTH had extremely poor returns --- and in the cas of the NRA, it's not new
Dog Gone at Penigma
Nov 2012
#17
I could with equal validity claim *this* guy is "representative of gun owners"
friendly_iconoclast
Nov 2012
#40
The NRA is one of the core founding groups of ALEC, gun control popularity
Dog Gone at Penigma
Nov 2012
#15
English Castle Doctrine includes a VERY strong duty to retreat, always has
Dog Gone at Penigma
Nov 2012
#35
On what screwed up, backward planet is self-defense equated to law enforcement?
AtheistCrusader
Nov 2012
#60
They've demonstrated yet again gun control advocacy is religious in nature.
friendly_iconoclast
Nov 2012
#74
Actually the details matter, and you are are yet to get many of them correct
ProgressiveProfessor
Nov 2012
#79
Frank Luntz, as in "Words That Work: It's Not What You Say, It's What People Hear"?
friendly_iconoclast
Nov 2012
#34
There is no broad bipartisan support for gun control, not much grass roots support for it either
ProgressiveProfessor
Nov 2012
#91