Reply #22

In the discussion thread: Permanent protective order failed to protect, defensive gunfire succeeded. [View all]

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 12:46 PM

22. Here's the results of the alert on his post

At Sat Nov 10, 2012, 11:34 PM you sent an alert on the following post:

So you're not smart enough to understand my proposal?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1172&pid=86040

REASON FOR ALERT:

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)

YOUR COMMENTS:

Accusing a DU'er of lying w/o any proof.

A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Sat Nov 10, 2012, 11:48 PM, and voted 4-2 to HIDE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: An unwarranted personal attack in addition imo.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given

Thank you.

Every now and then we actually win one.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

22 replies	Author	Time	Post
Permanent protective order failed to protect, defensive gunfire succeeded. [View all]	GreenStormCloud	Nov 2012	OP
If protective orders had more teeth	jenw2	Nov 2012	#1
How?	glacierbay	Nov 2012	#2
What changes in the laws, to give more teeth to a PO, would you support	oneshooter	Nov 2012	#3
Please provide your suggestions. What "teeth" do you propose?	PavePusher	Nov 2012	#4
This post was hidden by jury decision.	jenw2	Nov 2012	#11
???	oneshooter	Nov 2012	#12
you just said "had more teeth" which means what?	gejohnston	Nov 2012	#13
You haven't proposed anything.	Decoy of Fenris	Nov 2012	#14
Someone has departed for a crunchy pizza. n/t	PavePusher	Nov 2012	#21
Here's the results of the alert on his post	glacierbay	Nov 2012	#22
Well...	rrneck	Nov 2012	#5
Sometimes violence IS the answer to violence.	GreenStormCloud	Nov 2012	#6
What would you suggest and how would it help when a drunk lunatic is breaking down the door?	ProgressiveProfessor	Nov 2012	#7
Maybe if the protective order...	krispos42	Nov 2012	#8
"You're trying to solve the problem of violence with more violence."	TPaine7	Nov 2012	#9
My son calls that violence by proxy.	Remmah2	Nov 2012	#16
I expect the police to show up with some comfy chairs and a nice chamomile tea	4th law of robotics	Nov 2012	#18
Teeth can be used for violence.	Remmah2	Nov 2012	#15
Elaborate.	4th law of robotics	Nov 2012	#17
Yup.	Servius Valerius	Nov 2012	#10
I'd say maximizing the equality of the individual	4th law of robotics	Nov 2012	#19
How do you reason with thugs that are about to beat you up for kicks?	GreenStormCloud	Nov 2012	#20

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.