Reply #3

In the discussion thread: Wisconsin residents need stricter gun laws [View all]

Response to SecularMotion (Original post)

Thu Nov 8, 2012, 10:52 AM

3. Same thing we do in MO

if a restraining order is issued, the recipient of said order is ordered to relinquish any and all firearms, name goes into a database of temp. prohibited persons, any weapons are stored in our evidence room until final outcome of case and then either returned or sold.
Now, that won't stop someone from buying from a private seller and that's why I do support opening up NICS to private sellers to determine if the buyer is a prohibited person or not.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

15 replies	Author	Time	Post
Wisconsin residents need stricter gun laws [View all]	SecularMotion	Nov 2012	OP
I don't have much of a problem with this, but it probably won't do any good.	Atypical Liberal	Nov 2012	#1
Excellent post.nt	Eleanors38	Nov 2012	#4
Such laws have been proven to be useless and in recent news too.	Clames	Nov 2012	#2
"Seems"?	rl6214	Nov 2012	#14
Same thing we do in MO	glacierbay	Nov 2012	#3
If the guns are sold, who gets the money? nt	rrneck	Nov 2012	#6
I believe, according to my Division commander	glacierbay	Nov 2012	#8
I agree. nt	rrneck	Nov 2012	#9
Could that be considered "theft under color of law".	oneshooter	Nov 2012	#12
I don't thinks so	glacierbay	Nov 2012	#15
The shooter had to break several laws to do what he did.	PavePusher	Nov 2012	#5
restraining order recipients to surrender their weapons..maybe not a bad thing.	ileus	Nov 2012	#7
The shooter at Azana's had a lenghty criminal record.	GreenStormCloud	Nov 2012	#10
As a Wisconsin resident, no thankyou. N/T	clffrdjk	Nov 2012	#11
So you've contacted your WI congressmen to make that happen?	rl6214	Nov 2012	#13

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.