Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

shadowrider

(4,941 posts)
26. Good response with no snark. If I may respond:
Sat Nov 3, 2012, 11:51 AM
Nov 2012

Under existing federal law, unlicensed gun sellers are allowed to sell weapons without a background check of the buyer at gun shows and other private sales. Paradoxically, only licensed dealers are required to conduct such background checks, which gun control advocates see as crucial in cutting off the supply of weapons to criminals and mentally unstable individuals. The NRA strongly opposes legislation that would close this glaring loophole by requiring background checks for all gun sales.

>>> Loopholes are created by uninformed legislators who pat themselves on the back for a job well done without bothering to look at unintended consequences. Don't get upset with the NRA, get upset with shortsighted legislators and lobby them to change the inadequate laws they've passed.

The NRA has strongly opposed legislation to prohibit the sale of guns to people on the federal government's terrorist watch list. Under current law, a suspected terrorist can be put on the no-fly list and be kept off a plane, but can't be prevented from buying a gun.

>>> There is no known mechanism which is available to the public so they know 1) How they got on the list and 2) There is no mechanism known to the public to remove their name from the list. Allowing the terror watch list to be used as a mechanism to deny gun ownership opens the door to abuse by those in power.

The NRA has made several attempts to usher through Congress an "ATF reform bill" that would make it much harder – some say virtually impossible – to revoke the gun-selling licenses of crooked dealers. If the bill passed – and the NRA is expected to try again soon – the ATF would have to prove the dealer's state of mind, in terms of his or her premeditated intention to break the law.

>>> If you approve people being put on the terror watch list and being denied gun ownership simply because someone might question their state of mind, what's wrong with having to do the same to dealers?

Seems to me you want it both ways.

Virtually impossible is a relative term. Government can pass any law they want to get around "virtually impossible".

Just my opinion, yours may vary.

This message was self-deleted by its author glacierbay Nov 2012 #1
That's ALWAYS Your Way fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #4
Clearly you have an issue. Take it to meta. I hope this one is locked too. nt rDigital Nov 2012 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author glacierbay Nov 2012 #9
Despite the subject line krispos42 Nov 2012 #23
OK glacierbay Nov 2012 #30
Thank You fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #63
I think people were assuming it was a protest re-post. krispos42 Nov 2012 #89
What laws, exactly, would you propose? Discuss. shadowrider Nov 2012 #2
Like... fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #12
Good response with no snark. If I may respond: shadowrider Nov 2012 #26
Good Conversation fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #100
What should be fixed is the fact that you're put on that list glacierbay Nov 2012 #101
Good fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #102
What you are approving of is giving government the go-ahead WinniSkipper Nov 2012 #116
Can't write your own stuff huh? rrneck Nov 2012 #34
Personal Attack and Nonresponsive fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #37
Well. at least you wrote that. I guess. nt rrneck Nov 2012 #48
Nonresponsive fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #60
Okay, rrneck Nov 2012 #81
I guess you don't want to make a Point.... fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #110
See post #22. nt rrneck Nov 2012 #115
What points...your post was a personal attack ProgressiveProfessor Nov 2012 #106
Non Responsive fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #108
Fully responsive ProgressiveProfessor Nov 2012 #111
Ok fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #113
A reply krispos42 Nov 2012 #93
Pot Smokers Unite. You May Be a Criminal. White Collar Criminals Beware. They are coming for Tuesday Afternoon Nov 2012 #3
There is some merit to improving the current system. discntnt_irny_srcsm Nov 2012 #5
Thank You fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #14
Be careful before you so rapidly agree ProgressiveProfessor Nov 2012 #17
You're welcome and thanks. discntnt_irny_srcsm Nov 2012 #61
No answers to anything... discntnt_irny_srcsm Nov 2012 #105
The subject line is a broad brush smear. rDigital Nov 2012 #6
Owning Something is NOT the Same Thing as BEING Something fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #19
Semantics. Surely, You see the glaring prejudice in both cases. nt rDigital Nov 2012 #25
Sandy romany Nov 2012 #8
Welcome and why would that be? discntnt_irny_srcsm Nov 2012 #13
Interesting strategy ... holdencaufield Nov 2012 #10
I agree glacierbay Nov 2012 #11
It only underscores the desperation ... holdencaufield Nov 2012 #21
Bull Sh€t fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #16
This coming from one of the louder and nastier trolls here? ProgressiveProfessor Nov 2012 #18
Off Topic and a Personal Attack fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #27
Such a delicate flower ... holdencaufield Nov 2012 #28
Personal Attack, Nonresonsive and Off Topic fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #45
What is a hidden criminal? OneTenthofOnePercent Nov 2012 #15
Many Voters are Hidden Idiots and that's WHY I Support Voter Control Laws. nt jody Nov 2012 #20
Being an Idiot is NOT a Crime fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #29
as you are a good example. Tuesday Afternoon Nov 2012 #36
Personal Attack and Nonresponsive fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #39
I control my arms. I suggest you do the same. Tuesday Afternoon Nov 2012 #43
Actually fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #65
just exactly who is this We of which you speak? Tuesday Afternoon Nov 2012 #71
No, you won't. Clames Nov 2012 #114
"Gun clutches" rl6214 Nov 2012 #118
Alert or be gone fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #119
I don't alert on idiotic posts rl6214 Nov 2012 #120
Well on that we agree fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #121
Lucky you ... holdencaufield Nov 2012 #38
lol!!! darkangel218 Nov 2012 #46
"Being a hidden criminal is NOT a Crime" and absent an intelligent definition you prove my case. nt jody Nov 2012 #42
Explain rrneck Nov 2012 #22
Unresponsive. What a shock. rrneck Nov 2012 #103
The lunatics may have finally taken over this asylum. DanTex Nov 2012 #24
indeed, it would appear that the Lunatics are, in fact, doing that. Good Luck! Tuesday Afternoon Nov 2012 #40
Reccing because there is no Unrec function in DU3 slackmaster Nov 2012 #31
Nonsense fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #33
If this thread was really about a need for more effective background checks you could have chosen... slackmaster Nov 2012 #72
You Choose Your Title to Support Your Argument which I Did .... fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #83
You cannot compromise the rights of law-abiding people in an attempt to stop criminals. Atypical Liberal Nov 2012 #32
You Mean Like Scrutinizing Those on the Terrorist Watch List...before I have to fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #35
You trust the terrorist watch list? Do you even know how many Democrats were on it rDigital Nov 2012 #49
See Previous Points Made In Thread Above fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #58
No points were made above ProgressiveProfessor Nov 2012 #107
See Post 12 fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #109
I suggest you find a qualified source first ProgressiveProfessor Nov 2012 #112
So you would have denied Ted Kennedy a gun? His name appeared on that list. hack89 Nov 2012 #51
No fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #57
How did he get on the list in the first place? hack89 Nov 2012 #62
I Support That fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #68
no there isn't gejohnston Nov 2012 #74
Are you unfamiliar with "probable cause"? holdencaufield Nov 2012 #75
There is no judicial review - show me where a judge is involved. hack89 Nov 2012 #77
See Post 1 fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #82
It was self deleted - can you paraphrase? nt hack89 Nov 2012 #84
My Apologies fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #85
But that doesn't answer my question. hack89 Nov 2012 #87
Ok....I get you think I am wrong fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #88
Lol, and you claim people here spout RW talking points Union Scribe Nov 2012 #117
Do you support due process? hack89 Nov 2012 #52
Sure fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #55
What about the process to get ON the list? hack89 Nov 2012 #59
Not Without a Better Appeal Process fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #66
Why are they put on the list in the first place w/o due process? glacierbay Nov 2012 #67
It Goes To A Judge fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #70
How do you know that? glacierbay Nov 2012 #76
Before? fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #79
But the individual is not told that they are being put on the list glacierbay Nov 2012 #90
We Agree fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #92
Why an appeal after the fact? glacierbay Nov 2012 #94
You know this how, exactly shadowrider Nov 2012 #78
Read Glacierbay's response on the topic fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #80
there are no terrorists on the terrorist watch list gejohnston Nov 2012 #73
No one should suupport the "Terrorist Watch List". Atypical Liberal Nov 2012 #95
This list smacks of J.Edgar Hoover and Sen. Joesph McCarthy. glacierbay Nov 2012 #97
gun control MrYikes Nov 2012 #41
oh, Mr - Tuesday Afternoon Nov 2012 #44
What if they were only shoplifitng a Toblerone from a convenience store? rDigital Nov 2012 #47
No exceptions ... holdencaufield Nov 2012 #50
The Death Penalty though? This a big tent, but not that big. Authoritarian murderers are rDigital Nov 2012 #53
Apparently, not only welcome ... holdencaufield Nov 2012 #54
I see this too. nt rDigital Nov 2012 #69
It really never takes very long ... holdencaufield Nov 2012 #56
You forgot this. glacierbay Nov 2012 #64
so MrYikes Nov 2012 #86
You Make a Good Case fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #91
But it does exist. glacierbay Nov 2012 #96
Uh,,What? MrYikes Nov 2012 #98
Sorry glacierbay Nov 2012 #99
Gah! rrneck Nov 2012 #104
If I were to get this into law MrYikes Nov 2012 #122
The rank injustice would make it so. rrneck Nov 2012 #123
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Many Gun Owners are Hidde...»Reply #26